Guys take a room for the **** you are writting since page 1 in this thread, you changed a nice attempt from Grotruk into a flamewars thread and it is not the only one you did it, if you wanna flame at each other make a thread and dont take others thread´s for the **** you are doing! or do it in the open RVR since you doing it already....
vote for cleaning the flame post´s at the one from Ototo who started it
Annoying as f**k
Return of Reckoning T1
Re: Return of Reckoning T1
Elratie Frinaba Linera Telsir Skigg Knecht
Elements/z noob
http://www.returnofreckoning.com/forum/ ... =20&t=3593 Old War Screen´s
http://www.returnofreckoning.com/forum/ ... 54&t=11901 Elements Video´s
Artstation: https://www.artstation.com/elratie
Elements/z noob
http://www.returnofreckoning.com/forum/ ... =20&t=3593 Old War Screen´s
http://www.returnofreckoning.com/forum/ ... 54&t=11901 Elements Video´s
Artstation: https://www.artstation.com/elratie
Ads
Re: Return of Reckoning T1
As long as is directly aimed to me, i think that i will have to clarify what i do think that are logical falacies in ur post.
It was my personal opinion and i stick to it, unless that i have reasons to change it. My "flame" post discovered 2 banned players. If people is enraged at the over-abuse of a bug, people will express it. What i cant see is the reason why all u in the other side are directing the guilty-finger at me. Im way less diplomatic and more direct saying things, but dont get me wrong, if i do believe that something is bad, i will denounce it. It will, as allways was, my personal opinion. I will still go to bed knowing that i sticked to my ethics. The way i am, i understand that not all people like it. You can be sure that i will not use any bug for my pleasure. My actions in the past regarding this speak for me.
It was my personal opinion and i stick to it, unless that i have reasons to change it. My "flame" post discovered 2 banned players. If people is enraged at the over-abuse of a bug, people will express it. What i cant see is the reason why all u in the other side are directing the guilty-finger at me. Im way less diplomatic and more direct saying things, but dont get me wrong, if i do believe that something is bad, i will denounce it. It will, as allways was, my personal opinion. I will still go to bed knowing that i sticked to my ethics. The way i am, i understand that not all people like it. You can be sure that i will not use any bug for my pleasure. My actions in the past regarding this speak for me.
Spoiler:
- jonathanmurphy3
- Posts: 266
Re: Return of Reckoning T1
^
* You got beaten by a Witch Elf using stealth, and decided to vent your frustration by - coincidentally - attributing it to someone in my guild
* Learn to play
* Stop nameshaming people
Cheers.
Personal opinion doesn't equate to EMPIRICALLY VERIFIABLE. It's my personal opinion that black orcs live on Mars: shall I make a topic about it, and demand that everyone heed my words without evidence?
Good day.
* You got beaten by a Witch Elf using stealth, and decided to vent your frustration by - coincidentally - attributing it to someone in my guild
* Learn to play
* Stop nameshaming people
Cheers.
Personal opinion doesn't equate to EMPIRICALLY VERIFIABLE. It's my personal opinion that black orcs live on Mars: shall I make a topic about it, and demand that everyone heed my words without evidence?
Good day.
Spoiler:
Re: Return of Reckoning T1
Calm down guys, I was just saying that Pooch/LUPUS offered anything other than combat in a zerg.
And I found it great because it was a linear pvp from one WARCAMP to another one, that we mostly had. And I see almost 7 pages of insults on him / her. Can we just talk about RVR in first tier without injure the reputation of this player ?
And I found it great because it was a linear pvp from one WARCAMP to another one, that we mostly had. And I see almost 7 pages of insults on him / her. Can we just talk about RVR in first tier without injure the reputation of this player ?
- jonathanmurphy3
- Posts: 266
Re: Return of Reckoning T1
^ thank you, mate.
Apologise for any insults to other players. just don't like having guild members constantly accused of stuff they haven't done/no evidence to support claims.
apologise to developers for this stupid feud, too. last post.
Apologise for any insults to other players. just don't like having guild members constantly accused of stuff they haven't done/no evidence to support claims.
apologise to developers for this stupid feud, too. last post.
Spoiler:
Re: Return of Reckoning T1
Its true?Ototo wrote: .... My "flame" post discovered 2 banned players. ....
Re: Return of Reckoning T1
Page 4:Balun wrote:Its true?Ototo wrote: .... My "flame" post discovered 2 banned players. ....
Page 5:Azarael wrote:Pooch is a Gothmorg alt?
This is why we need a public ban list.
I'd also like to make it very clear, right now, that I take an extremely dim view of guilds re-accepting alts of banned players. That is a very personal insult. We banned those players for a reason, and if you know they're here and don't report it, I hold you - anyone who knew - complicit in hiding them.
Azarael wrote:You are him - you registered from the IP of a previous Gothmorg account.
Please stop wasting my time with this bullshit.
Spoiler:
Re: Return of Reckoning T1
I more or less meant it's simply viewed as cheese with the current bug, it honestly doesn't bother me that much. Just started a WE the other day since I had the gear sitting around. I'm not trying to single you guys out at all, others in the thread were so I just posted my opinion in that context. If it came off that way, sorry I guess.sotora wrote:It was not directed at me, but since I play WE in his guild...labotimy wrote: running different MDPS in your premade until the current bug is resolved would probably help yalls reputation in regards to this issue. I'm not gonna sit here and say you guys are cheating or anything like some others in the thread, but at the same time using that setup with the current issues is definitely cheese.
I personall and we as a guild were playing WEs long before skill patch and stealth bug introduction. Nothing changed in this regard.
It is a bit silly to single out our guild, when we used to also run 2x WE premades before skill patch and we simply continue to do so now as well. Not much has changed in this regard. Actually nowadays we use to more often bring other DPS classes like Sorcs or Marauders than before. On the other hand everyone can see that post big skill patch Enginner numbers in scenarios dwindled considerably and WH numbers swinged upwards considerably. No more mass Engis in scenarios but 3-4 WH is nothing special nowadays, when pre-stealth bug it was very very rare.
WEs was relatively popular class (naked elf duh!) in all time I was here Return of Reckoning, while WH became popular post-stealth bug.
Basically WE's have an inadvertent advantage, people be mad, I'm not surprised. Don't care personally devs will patch it in due time.
Ads
- jonathanmurphy3
- Posts: 266
Re: Return of Reckoning T1
Just stop, man. Play the game, chill out.Ototo wrote:Page 4:Balun wrote:Its true?Ototo wrote: .... My "flame" post discovered 2 banned players. ....
Page 5:Azarael wrote:Pooch is a Gothmorg alt?
This is why we need a public ban list.
I'd also like to make it very clear, right now, that I take an extremely dim view of guilds re-accepting alts of banned players. That is a very personal insult. We banned those players for a reason, and if you know they're here and don't report it, I hold you - anyone who knew - complicit in hiding them.
Azarael wrote:You are him - you registered from the IP of a previous Gothmorg account.
Please stop wasting my time with this bullshit.
Spoiler:
Re: Return of Reckoning T1
I'll actually miss having Pooch out in the battlefield. I do love a good predator. Even considering bugged stealth, he was miles in front of the other WEs. Sadly bad decisions and his brother's big mouth got him banned. ;(
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 3 guests