ranked sov vs conq why try and fix a bad ide in the first place

[Jusva321]

now i can que for lower bracket and have a chance to get a team in conq vs one in sov why is it that you dont get that it was a bad ide in the first place an make it 70+ invader unluck for ubber bracket and rest below ... then if you want to play in the lower bracket make it so you can even if you are 70+ and have invader

[Arthem]

I don't se the point in the initial bracket change if you let ppl dodge it anyway. If you go to lower bracket with your big boy then expect to see noobs / beginners on both sides. Don't even know why they are giving you the option or why you'd want to do it

[Akalukz]

Unfortunately, the game doesn't have a population for ranked solo queue matches. Should focus on ranked group matches. Properly incentivize groups.

[Evilest]

It's the equivalent of having a solid premade party, filling the rest of the wb with random undergeared pugs with some 2-2-2 semblance, and queuing city.

[Elvicof]

It's the equivalent of having a solid premade party, filling the rest of the wb with random undergeared pugs with some 2-2-2 semblance, and queuing city.

That setup is the basis of balancing decision. In city and sc the fights are ever so balanced

[Evilest]

It's the equivalent of having a solid premade party, filling the rest of the wb with random undergeared pugs with some 2-2-2 semblance, and queuing city.

That setup is the basis of balancing decision. In city and sc the fights are ever so balanced

I think you missed the slight subtlety of hand from the premade party to improve their outcome at the expense of the rest of the wb, precisely because of the "so balanced" cities.