SH AA damage not insrease from tactics. (Part 1)
Re: SH AA damage not insrease from tactics. (Part 1)
Why SH complaining about AA dame. On paper SH has insane tools. Pounce like WL, Shatterred limbs like Slayer, Inevitable doom like slayer with corporal dmg(Really bad gas), Self heal chain like Choppa or Slayer, Self punt+snare like SW, Best charge in game 75% speed ignoring body blocking which also interrupt for its duration, melee KD, snare, disarm, interrupt. Yes, some of these abbilites has higher CD than theyr original owners, but that doesnt change fact that melee SH is great for party AND warband gameplay. On other hand melee SWs and SWs in general are in really bad position in term of warband usefullnes so please, dont take them as shield for arguing about they have X and I want it too....
"Quickness is the essence of the war."
Sun Tzu
Sun Tzu
Ads
Re: SH AA damage not insrease from tactics. (Part 1)
Personal opinion here , I don’t think giving horned squig amor buff + ABM damage boost + pounce spam in 1 tactic without have to use the pet anymore is balanced for a Pet career .Brutinho wrote: ↑Wed Apr 03, 2019 8:10 pmPlease, lets do it and make pet's great again!![]()
In all seriousness, if TA is meant to promote WB play, it can make the AA + hast proc inefective while it is slotted. That way people could chose between pet and burst or AOE damage increase. I will think of a proposal :3 (I am still thinking of a few of these for mSH to send out)
Re: SH AA damage not insrease from tactics. (Part 1)
I know what he means , just trying to explain that AA damage stat and melee damage stat are 2 different stats , unless the tooltip mention AA damage , it’s usually not increased
- shaggyboomboom
- Posts: 1230
Re: SH AA damage not insrease from tactics. (Part 1)
When the old zealot AP ritual said attacks, it would proc off abilities and AAs. TA says attacks, so it should increase all melee attacks, AAs and abilities.

Re: SH AA damage not insrease from tactics. (Part 1)
Spoiler:
Spoiler:
[BG] Amelios RR8X
[SH] Gittens RR8X | [SHM] Moquito RR 6X
[IB] Ambiorix RR 7X
[KOBS] Quarterback RR7X
[SH] Gittens RR8X | [SHM] Moquito RR 6X
[IB] Ambiorix RR 7X
[KOBS] Quarterback RR7X
Re: SH AA damage not insrease from tactics. (Part 1)
Just put MSH on par with WL single target effectiveness, i'm sure order won't mind.
Bashgutz RR82 Borc Vaseryn RR61 SM Krantz RR82 Knight Corvinus RR70 Chosen Mormonty RR72 IB
Starkus RR70 BG Snaptz RR83 SH Plagueis RR81 Magus Alec RR85 Engie Sourgazt RR69 Shaman
Kreaver RR80 Marauder Dugald RR75 Slayer
Starkus RR70 BG Snaptz RR83 SH Plagueis RR81 Magus Alec RR85 Engie Sourgazt RR69 Shaman
Kreaver RR80 Marauder Dugald RR75 Slayer
Re: SH AA damage not insrease from tactics. (Part 1)
Staying on topic- the author is right that two tactics to increase 25% and 15% damage will not affect autoattacks. Looks like they should!
also bigger disadvantage of melee SH autoattacks is that he is onehander dps.
also bigger disadvantage of melee SH autoattacks is that he is onehander dps.
Ads
Re: SH AA damage not insrease from tactics. (Part 1)
Globaling everything but SnB tanks from 65ft doesnt sound much like mdps, so it would actualy fit SH better as of role principles.
DoK RR80+, Chosen RR80+, Choppa RR70+, SH RR75+ WP RR65+
Re: SH AA damage not insrease from tactics. (Part 1)
i have both classes over rr 60 and good geared, and trust me, my WL never did as high crits as my Melee squig does. I dont see any issue on the melee squig atm. Tbh the dmg is SUPER good. Highest crit so far is 1.8k. Normally crit is like 1.1 to 1.3k. Depends on target ofc. Overall the dmg is just super good. I can pretty much kill most sw's, bw's, engi's, wh's and you name it in 1 KD (3 seconds) ofc it depends on player and build they run.
Oh. and i run with no pet ofc.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], ArcturianPrime, Bing [Bot] and 12 guests