TenTonHammer wrote:Point 5 is especially correct
In W40K the victory of chaos is seen as inevitable bar nom noming by the nids
in the End Times it was ment to be the culmination of every prophecy and other factors that ment that it was all supposed to be up in the air about what happens and who comes out on top but GW goes with the most predictable thing ever
Thanks Geni, those points echoed my thoughts.
I think the Chaos Wins scenario was ultimately frustrating because winning was never Chaos' objective, but the act of chaos itself, this has been echoed many times over the years. Chaos is interested in staying invested, having things constantly change, shuffle the deck, winning means the game is over. I don't think GW understands their own lore anymore. I know they don't understand 40k's satire or how much the game satirizes the very thing they have become.
The chaos gods and chaos itself is just a reflection of living creatures that inhabit the world, they need to be sustained by these creatures to survive. Annihilation of every single being would mean their eventual death. in 40k this is perfectly understood by Chaos Space Marines, they know their battle will be indefinite. (Hence the concept of Eternal War)... just another example of hijacking their own established cannon and adapting it to suite their 'business'...
AoS is already tanking, and I am sure TW:Warhammer is going to be an eye opener on how much people loved the Old World.