
Y’all need to buff 2H chosen
Forum rules
Before posting on this forum, be sure to read the Terms of Use
Your topic MUST start with your class name between hooks (IE : [Shaman] blablabla)
Before posting on this forum, be sure to read the Terms of Use
Your topic MUST start with your class name between hooks (IE : [Shaman] blablabla)
Re: Y’all need to buff 2H chosen
byff bad chosens 

"give wh and witch propper aoe like evrywone has it!"
Ads
- CountTalabecland
- Posts: 1023
Re: Y’all need to buff 2H chosen
2h spec does not equal dps spec.
2h, for majority of tanks, has some utility locked behind it. You can still be tanky and be 2h. You trade one level of defense against ranged and guard damage by losing block.
Parry, which every 2h should stack, still mitigates guard damage. Combine this with toughness, and a 2h tank is still tank combined with wounds/armor from gear/talis/pot.
You still play like normal and focus guard and CC. 100% still a tank role, not trying to be a Dps.
“DPS” tank is the subopitmal thing where pppl intentionally go low defense for more offense with the intention of playing like a DPS class or solo.
Tldr, not all 2h tanks are DPS tanks.
2h, for majority of tanks, has some utility locked behind it. You can still be tanky and be 2h. You trade one level of defense against ranged and guard damage by losing block.
Parry, which every 2h should stack, still mitigates guard damage. Combine this with toughness, and a 2h tank is still tank combined with wounds/armor from gear/talis/pot.
You still play like normal and focus guard and CC. 100% still a tank role, not trying to be a Dps.
“DPS” tank is the subopitmal thing where pppl intentionally go low defense for more offense with the intention of playing like a DPS class or solo.
Tldr, not all 2h tanks are DPS tanks.
Brynnoth Goldenbeard (40/80) (IB) -- Rundin Fireheart (40/50) (RP) -- Ungrinn (40/40) (Engi)-- Bramm Bloodaxe (40/83) (Slayer) and a few Empire characters here or there, maybe even an elf.
Re: Y’all need to buff 2H chosen
2h tanks like BO/SM have less utility and worse punts, there by being neutered for any group play, check the most successful tank careers in ranked and ponder about why there's so few BOs and SMs if damage is the solution to everything.TenTonHammer wrote: ↑Wed Aug 04, 2021 1:09 amImagine still having this outdated mentality that being labeled as a tank means you exist to be a guard botRapzel wrote: ↑Tue Aug 03, 2021 4:50 pmWhy should we care about the minority that wants to play DPS on a tank?Adema958 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 03, 2021 4:31 pm “ After the introduction of Corruptive Power I don't see any issues with Chosen as a tank, yes before Chosen got this it was a walking punt/aura bot, but now it actually brings some great utility to groups.”
Why would I care about tank spec? The entire post is how outdated and lackluster 2H chosen is. And before I hear anything about, “it’s a tank class, play tank” then the 2H mastery tree shouldn’t exist for the class.
Period
The 2h spec exists, tanks like SM and blorc exist to be DPS brawlers before these devs gutted the shield specs by removing THC from from SnB spec
The purpose of 2H specs is either to do damage like Blorc or to apply utility effects like crimson death on BG
That's what you trade block, htl, survivability with mixed defenses and everything else that comes with a shield
Chosen lost the utility of crippling strikes + rending blade in it's 2h spec so the only thing it can do now is damage because the RoR devs removed the original purpose of the spec
Are you surprised that you lock into the tank role when you pick a career under the archetype tank?
Should careers like shadow warriors and marauders get a healer specs then or should only healers and tanks be allowed to have their main archetype + DPS spec?
Chosen is fine, not as good as BG or KotBS in group play, but it's fine.
Re: Y’all need to buff 2H chosen
Don't forget to add that BG had an equivalent to wall of darting steel called rebounding hatred.ashton007 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 03, 2021 7:12 pm They really just need to bring back crippling strikes, they gave it to SM and said it was too broken for chosens. It wasn’t, the devs here are order bias, now order has (aoe) 20%damage reduction(stacking with challenge and bellow)/ap aura/15% heal/ And now they have better morale pumping ( pretty much left destro high and dry)
-
- Posts: 91
Re: Y’all need to buff 2H chosen
2h BG PUMP damage out and have just as much utility. Shield DOKs/WP PUMP damage AND heals. Why should these exist as playable off specs with meaningful output while others shouldn't?Rapzel wrote: ↑Wed Aug 04, 2021 1:59 pm2h tanks like BO/SM have less utility and worse punts, there by being neutered for any group play, check the most successful tank careers in ranked and ponder about why there's so few BOs and SMs if damage is the solution to everything.TenTonHammer wrote: ↑Wed Aug 04, 2021 1:09 amImagine still having this outdated mentality that being labeled as a tank means you exist to be a guard bot
The 2h spec exists, tanks like SM and blorc exist to be DPS brawlers before these devs gutted the shield specs by removing THC from from SnB spec
The purpose of 2H specs is either to do damage like Blorc or to apply utility effects like crimson death on BG
That's what you trade block, htl, survivability with mixed defenses and everything else that comes with a shield
Chosen lost the utility of crippling strikes + rending blade in it's 2h spec so the only thing it can do now is damage because the RoR devs removed the original purpose of the spec
Are you surprised that you lock into the tank role when you pick a career under the archetype tank?
Should careers like shadow warriors and marauders get a healer specs then or should only healers and tanks be allowed to have their main archetype + DPS spec?
Chosen is fine, not as good as BG or KotBS in group play, but it's fine.
- TenTonHammer
- Posts: 3806
Re: Y’all need to buff 2H chosen
CountTalabecland wrote: ↑Wed Aug 04, 2021 11:50 am 2h spec does not equal dps spec.
2h, for majority of tanks, has some utility locked behind it. You can still be tanky and be 2h. You trade one level of defense against ranged and guard damage by losing block.
Parry, which every 2h should stack, still mitigates guard damage. Combine this with toughness, and a 2h tank is still tank combined with wounds/armor from gear/talis/pot.
You still play like normal and focus guard and CC. 100% still a tank role, not trying to be a Dps.
“DPS” tank is the subopitmal thing where pppl intentionally go low defense for more offense with the intention of playing like a DPS class or solo.
Tldr, not all 2h tanks are DPS tanks.
Your right the 2h spec on tanks is designed to trade survivability for utility often for ORvR level play
The problem is that the utility that came from crippling strikes + rending blade was long removed so the only option the spec now can do is damage. Something should be done to rending blade to give the spec a utility purpose again
So your argument is that m and rdps don't have an off spec so it's unfair that healers and tanks do?Rapzel wrote: ↑Wed Aug 04, 2021 1:59 pm2h tanks like BO/SM have less utility and worse punts, there by being neutered for any group play, check the most successful tank careers in ranked and ponder about why there's so few BOs and SMs if damage is the solution to everything.TenTonHammer wrote: ↑Wed Aug 04, 2021 1:09 amImagine still having this outdated mentality that being labeled as a tank means you exist to be a guard bot
The 2h spec exists, tanks like SM and blorc exist to be DPS brawlers before these devs gutted the shield specs by removing THC from from SnB spec
The purpose of 2H specs is either to do damage like Blorc or to apply utility effects like crimson death on BG
That's what you trade block, htl, survivability with mixed defenses and everything else that comes with a shield
Chosen lost the utility of crippling strikes + rending blade in it's 2h spec so the only thing it can do now is damage because the RoR devs removed the original purpose of the spec
Are you surprised that you lock into the tank role when you pick a career under the archetype tank?
Should careers like shadow warriors and marauders get a healer specs then or should only healers and tanks be allowed to have their main archetype + DPS spec?
Chosen is fine, not as good as BG or KotBS in group play, but it's fine.

Re: Y’all need to buff 2H chosen
No my argument is stated in the first sentence.TenTonHammer wrote: ↑Wed Aug 04, 2021 4:40 pmCountTalabecland wrote: ↑Wed Aug 04, 2021 11:50 am 2h spec does not equal dps spec.
2h, for majority of tanks, has some utility locked behind it. You can still be tanky and be 2h. You trade one level of defense against ranged and guard damage by losing block.
Parry, which every 2h should stack, still mitigates guard damage. Combine this with toughness, and a 2h tank is still tank combined with wounds/armor from gear/talis/pot.
You still play like normal and focus guard and CC. 100% still a tank role, not trying to be a Dps.
“DPS” tank is the subopitmal thing where pppl intentionally go low defense for more offense with the intention of playing like a DPS class or solo.
Tldr, not all 2h tanks are DPS tanks.
Your right the 2h spec on tanks is designed to trade survivability for utility often for ORvR level play
The problem is that the utility that came from crippling strikes + rending blade was long removed so the only option the spec now can do is damage. Something should be done to rending blade to give the spec a utility purpose again
So your argument is that m and rdps don't have an off spec so it's unfair that healers and tanks do?Rapzel wrote: ↑Wed Aug 04, 2021 1:59 pm2h tanks like BO/SM have less utility and worse punts, there by being neutered for any group play, check the most successful tank careers in ranked and ponder about why there's so few BOs and SMs if damage is the solution to everything.TenTonHammer wrote: ↑Wed Aug 04, 2021 1:09 am
Imagine still having this outdated mentality that being labeled as a tank means you exist to be a guard bot
The 2h spec exists, tanks like SM and blorc exist to be DPS brawlers before these devs gutted the shield specs by removing THC from from SnB spec
The purpose of 2H specs is either to do damage like Blorc or to apply utility effects like crimson death on BG
That's what you trade block, htl, survivability with mixed defenses and everything else that comes with a shield
Chosen lost the utility of crippling strikes + rending blade in it's 2h spec so the only thing it can do now is damage because the RoR devs removed the original purpose of the spec
Are you surprised that you lock into the tank role when you pick a career under the archetype tank?
Should careers like shadow warriors and marauders get a healer specs then or should only healers and tanks be allowed to have their main archetype + DPS spec?
Chosen is fine, not as good as BG or KotBS in group play, but it's fine.
Re: Y’all need to buff 2H chosen
I dont mind with more damage for knights, i dont know how the ppl who play this class get their dopamine is just the same predictable play when you see a knight... get stuned and super punt 24/7 and being immortal.
BUT chosen 2h needs something besides just damage which is decent but not as good as BO and BG. It needs utility
BUT chosen 2h needs something besides just damage which is decent but not as good as BO and BG. It needs utility
Chosen Dahaka RR90
BO Zamedi 80
BO Zamedi 80
Ads
Re: Y’all need to buff 2H chosen
Yea...They did it whit the Corruptive Power tactic, but it got nerfed whitin 24h and now its a useless one.

- CountTalabecland
- Posts: 1023
Re: Y’all need to buff 2H chosen
Devs, historically speaking, are not big fans of 2h tanks as shown by their attempt to eradicate them that one time by making their guard less effective than SnB (read "real") tanks.
Furthermore, they have also stated that they flat out don't want Knight doing damage.
I agree that 2h tank should be utility based and have a good off spec for small scale that involves being first and foremost a tank.
Knight has a fix soon* anyways so we will need to wait and see if he is left standing at all let alone as 2h.
Furthermore, they have also stated that they flat out don't want Knight doing damage.
I agree that 2h tank should be utility based and have a good off spec for small scale that involves being first and foremost a tank.
Knight has a fix soon* anyways so we will need to wait and see if he is left standing at all let alone as 2h.
Brynnoth Goldenbeard (40/80) (IB) -- Rundin Fireheart (40/50) (RP) -- Ungrinn (40/40) (Engi)-- Bramm Bloodaxe (40/83) (Slayer) and a few Empire characters here or there, maybe even an elf.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests