Wonder why Swordmasters rarely S@B?
Re: Wonder why Swordmasters rarely S@B?
I think it has something to do with the Eyes wierdenes, when You equip shield....
Nobody wants to see theyr characters looks like Frankenstein Brother 
"Quickness is the essence of the war."
Sun Tzu
Sun Tzu
Ads
Re: Wonder why Swordmasters rarely S@B?
Well, according to lore WLs shouldn't be a pet based class anyways. WLs just kill a white lion as a rite of passage and then wear their skin, they don't hang out with them. Obviously, we all know that lore meant little when Mythic developed WAR.Torquemadra wrote:SMs were supposed to be the DPS class, WL was to be the tank class but the insanity of a pet based tank class was just not meant to be sadly so were lost among with the melee orc shaman.Aethilmar wrote:I think the real question that needs to be asked here is why don't we see more Swordmasters dual-wielding?
Karak-Norn /// Asildur - RR100 WL /// Marsares - RR95 AM /// Nirnaeth - RR64 SW
-
Daknallbomb
- Posts: 1781
Re: Wonder why Swordmasters rarely S@B?
Hmm some wls riding White lions asi know?. But never seen As a Pet thats true
Tinkabell 40/41 Magus Whaagit 40/41 SH Whaagot 40/54 BO Daknallfrosch 40/72shammy
Re: Wonder why Swordmasters rarely S@B?
Oh man if WLs were the tank class I'd actually play it.
Osri - 40/79 - Runepriest
Osarion 40/82 - Swordmaster
Osgrim 40/74 - Ironbreaker
Osarion 40/82 - Swordmaster
Osgrim 40/74 - Ironbreaker
Re: Wonder why Swordmasters rarely S@B?
Absolutely agreed.roadkillrobin wrote:If I remember correctly WL didn't mean to be a pet class originally and was redesign due to someone felt that it would be unfair that Destro had 2 petclasses while Order just 1. Considering the issues that came with petclasses AI and the how badly the pets plays in large scale combat, this was probobly a really bad decision.
WITNESS ME!


Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], wildwindblows and 10 guests




