Recent Topics

Ads

[Gankbus]Stream

A place for people to post their RvR or PvE videos.
Just hope you're not the target :)
Forum rules
Before posting on this forum, be sure to read the Terms of Use
User avatar
Novgoroth
Posts: 133

Re: [Gankbus]Stream

Post#91 » Tue Apr 19, 2016 9:45 am

Bretin wrote: CW vs Legion of Boom from yesterday:
https://www.twitch.tv/stenchypow/v/61263086 - shout out to ma man Polan and Khorlar, thanks for the group <3
When do we do that again but balance ? Without a bugged Witchbrew ?
Scaarlett - Disciple of Khaine | Scarlett - Witch Elf | Scarlettonice - Sorceress | Scarlette - Zealot

Scarlettonfire - Bright Wizzard | Scarlettsm - Swordmaster | Scarlettm - Witch Hunter | Navselene - Archmage

Ads
Bretin
Posts: 929

Re: [Gankbus]Stream

Post#92 » Tue Apr 19, 2016 9:52 am

when will you step up your gameplay and be on toe with Deep and Dry or KappaPride instead of complaining about "bugs" you have no proofs for? :)

guess after that we could do it again and call it a challenge for both sides

User avatar
Novgoroth
Posts: 133

Re: [Gankbus]Stream

Post#93 » Tue Apr 19, 2016 9:57 am

What about that then ? https://github.com/WarEmu/WarBugs/issues/2714

And if it's not a proof for you, then you should be able to do the same with a treason spec right ? =)
Scaarlett - Disciple of Khaine | Scarlett - Witch Elf | Scarlettonice - Sorceress | Scarlette - Zealot

Scarlettonfire - Bright Wizzard | Scarlettsm - Swordmaster | Scarlettm - Witch Hunter | Navselene - Archmage

Bretin
Posts: 929

Re: [Gankbus]Stream

Post#94 » Tue Apr 19, 2016 10:24 am

there is still no proof about how witchbrew was implemented on live, some say it was limited to 2 procs per gcd, some say 1 per gcd and others say it was like here, thats why the case is still opened. i still fail to see how it is "too strong". explanations can be found in my post history.

also your offer makes no sense to me since there is no reason to join a certain fight with a mediocre group spec. it is like asking you to play with a melee shadow warrior.

the keyword is called inability since there are groups (like the above mentioned) who can outpressure us.

now leave the salt and the derail train out of this topic and go to the bugtracker if you think something is wrong. but make sure to have a proof.

cya on the battlefield my friend :)

Jail
Posts: 376

Re: [Gankbus]Stream

Post#95 » Tue Apr 19, 2016 10:27 am

Novgoroth wrote:
Bretin wrote: CW vs Legion of Boom from yesterday:
https://www.twitch.tv/stenchypow/v/61263086 - shout out to ma man Polan and Khorlar, thanks for the group <3
When do we do that again but balance ? Without a bugged Witchbrew ?
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

User avatar
peterthepan3
Posts: 6509

Re: [Gankbus]Stream

Post#96 » Tue Apr 19, 2016 11:33 am

Imagine the uproar in t4 when WB + crit tactic/morale become available :))))))
Image

User avatar
Amakusa
Posts: 91

Re: [Gankbus]Stream

Post#97 » Tue Apr 19, 2016 12:09 pm

Bretin wrote:there is still no proof about how witchbrew was implemented on live, some say it was limited to 2 procs per gcd, some say 1 per gcd and others say it was like here, thats why the case is still opened. i still fail to see how it is "too strong". explanations can be found in my post history.
Back on Live Servers Witchbrew dont triggered from AA. Thats the reason why its so strong in RoR...
Kokoshibu, Riegert, Luniz, Kyo, Kenshin, Alaric, Notting <LiH>
Dunning, Boyka, Iluv, Onlyfangs, Snusnu, Engrimar, Soge <Like it Hard>

User avatar
peterthepan3
Posts: 6509

Re: [Gankbus]Stream

Post#98 » Tue Apr 19, 2016 12:10 pm

Do you have evidence to support that, bud? Would help.
Image

Ads
bloodi
Suspended
Posts: 1725

Re: [Gankbus]Stream

Post#99 » Tue Apr 19, 2016 12:11 pm

I would suggest that you follow the bugtracker link before spending more time arguing if its broken or not.

User avatar
peterthepan3
Posts: 6509

Re: [Gankbus]Stream

Post#100 » Tue Apr 19, 2016 12:19 pm

Didn't see - thanks bloodi! :D
Image

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests