Recent Topics

Ads

WH vs. WE

Chat about everything else - ask questions, share stories, or just hang out.
Orontes
Posts: 332

WH vs. WE

Post#1 » Fri Apr 27, 2018 2:11 pm

What's the sense of the wise on the comparison of the Witch Hunter vs. Witch Elf? Is one better than the other? If so, how so?

Ads
dansari
Posts: 2524

Re: WH vs. WE

Post#2 » Fri Apr 27, 2018 2:16 pm

I'm sure this will be a thoughtful, friendly discussion.
<Salt Factory>

User avatar
daniilpb
Posts: 591

Re: WH vs. WE

Post#3 » Fri Apr 27, 2018 2:17 pm

Image
Image
<Fusion>
Riphael - Black Guard.
Meridin - Sorcerer.
<FusionII>
Ripliel - Shadow Warrior.
Arfi - Swordmaster.
Very Serious Warhammer Online Montage

User avatar
Twohandernoob
Posts: 198

Re: WH vs. WE

Post#4 » Fri Apr 27, 2018 2:20 pm

Witch hunters are a bit better alone than WEs, WEs are better in grps than WH. Esp with all those destro tanks.

Wh vs WE encounters same gear/skill and not some specific duel spec favours WH

Literally cant wait for rest of thread to unfold :lol:

User avatar
Aurandilaz
Posts: 1896

Re: WH vs. WE

Post#5 » Fri Apr 27, 2018 2:28 pm

WH has undefendable BurnAwayLies for good burst, wears pointy hats. Witch Elf has lots of spikes and shows more skin.

Many Witch Elves run the Frenzied Mayhem tactic so they get more critical rate and avoid finishers. Meanwhile Witch Hunters kinda need to use finishers to get their Bullet procs out, meaning either Abso spam or bursting down gobbos with BaL. Both classes kinda have to run the right tree for Heartseeker/Pistolwhip Knockdowns and the 7point critical damage increaser tactic.
Goblin pets might smell a stealthed WH, same goes with White Lion pets smelling a stealthed WE because they reek of blood or something.
Both classes suffer somewhat from mobility issues, AE/DA are good for punting yourself away but the rest of the mdps have Charge which is better for actually chasing down targets.

Atm I'd say WH is slightly better off, due to undefendable BAL and WE finishers all feeling somewhat meh. Then there is the question of stuff like Subju weapons, with WE having access to 1 dmg proc and WH getting double dmg procs out. And some extra annoyances like WL pets sniffing at you breaking stealth or BWs ignoring your Disrupt Elixir, but I guess WHs suffer from the sneaky goblins as much due to their RunAway speed procs. And apparently WE Kiss procs were ninjanerfed and now have ICD.

Both classes can kill things, and with proper group can kill lot of things. Neither of them has a long life expectancy due to having light armour and facing medium armoured or heavy armoured frontline classes, but that's how its always been, less armor means more dmg, well, in most class cases. (only a special snowflake medium armoured class can get better burst than a well played WE/WH)

User avatar
bichka
Posts: 439

Re: WH vs. WE

Post#6 » Sat Apr 28, 2018 6:43 am

In short :
WE - better AP management(on live AP tactic was broken, on ROR it's works like description said), FP spam
WH - better finishers + uber m4 for long battles, EW for damage and huge 3-4(ini bullet) stat debuff.
WE - ranged KD, WB as "finisher".
WE have better disrupt cauldron placement in carrier tree.

BAL is cleanable and useless vs proper group unless your team is able to put lot of dots to cover it. But in PUGs nobody care anyway.

Both classes is fun, don't listen whiners, but for me WH look like finished class, while WE is kinda silly after some nerfs in past.

User avatar
catholicism198
Posts: 1092

Re: WH vs. WE

Post#7 » Sat Apr 28, 2018 7:01 am

bichka wrote: Sat Apr 28, 2018 6:43 am In short :
WE - better AP management(on live AP tactic was broken, on ROR it's works like description said), FP spam
WH - better finishers + uber m4 for long battles, EW for damage and huge 3-4(ini bullet) stat debuff.
WE - ranged KD, WB as "finisher".
WE have better disrupt cauldron placement in carrier tree.

BAL is cleanable and useless vs proper group unless your team is able to put lot of dots to cover it. But in PUGs nobody care anyway.

Both classes is fun, don't listen whiners, but for me WH look like finished class, while WE is kinda silly after some nerfs in past.
WH has a ranged KD as well.

User avatar
Fallenkezef
Posts: 1492

Re: WH vs. WE

Post#8 » Sat Apr 28, 2018 7:51 am

WH are religous sociopaths that wear REALLY cool hats.

WE are religous sociopaths in sexy bikinis.

Pretty equal in the rule of cool tbh.
Alea iacta est

Ads
User avatar
roadkillrobin
Posts: 2773

Re: WH vs. WE

Post#9 » Sat Apr 28, 2018 8:02 am

I think Frenzied Mayhem and Inquisiters Fury are pretty equal when it comes performance as neither class can't AoE for **** these days.

The classes are pretty equall on paper. When paired up with specific classes WH gets slightly better tho due to order just straight up having better support.
Image

User avatar
roadkillrobin
Posts: 2773

Re: WH vs. WE

Post#10 » Sat Apr 28, 2018 8:30 am

BAL needs target to face away so its basicly undefendeble unless applied with FP.
Image

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 27 guests