Upcoming Item Rebalancing

Discuss the development of the server, emulator, and related services.
Get the latest updates on new features and upcoming changes to Return of Reckoning.
Forum rules
Before posting on this forum, be sure to read the Terms of Service, Privacy Policy and Code of Conduct
User avatar
Rydiak
Game Master
Posts: 1145

Re: Upcoming Item Rebalancing

Post#81 » Tue Mar 31, 2026 5:54 pm

Realife wrote: Tue Mar 31, 2026 5:44 pm With hp per 4 only valued at 0.50, game is about to see a lot more regen
This value is double what it previously was.
Interested in the Grace playstyle but don't know where to start? Check out my Grace guide! Updated

Check out my Damage Calculator. Includes extra RoR calculators!

Ads
gyps
Posts: 170

Re: Upcoming Item Rebalancing

Post#82 » Tue Mar 31, 2026 9:01 pm

Yeah baby!!! 100% agree!! Keep the News incoming and evolving the game!

User avatar
Jeliel80
Posts: 140

Re: Upcoming Item Rebalancing

Post#83 » Wed Apr 01, 2026 11:35 am

Allright, then start "refunding" the hundreds of thousands of crests I've spent (10k for a bis ring, which never made sense), before the announced disaster happens.
Thanks :D
http://www.seventhlegion.net/
Jeliel - RP 87
Jelyel - DoK 87
Jel - WP 86
Jelielino - Shaman 86
Jelie - Zealot 84
Jelielina - AM 84

User avatar
live4treasure
Posts: 357

Re: Upcoming Item Rebalancing

Post#84 » Wed Apr 01, 2026 12:02 pm

For all those who are complaining about crest refunds, I invite you to think of this as an opportunity to be excited for your next piece of gear again. For many players, this is even the primary motivation to keep playing - well, you will have more of it. It's not a negative thing.
Giladar - rr 82 DPS AM

User avatar
Sinisterror
Posts: 1300

Re: Upcoming Item Rebalancing

Post#85 » Wed Apr 01, 2026 12:31 pm

Is there coming MORE regen or what?? pls no dont do that! When doing this item rebalancing - You should really add procs back to the RR38 Influence Items - also on Tier4 epic quest wpns that were removed for no real reason except to remove that option. Procs should never be gatekept, and they should be available to EVERYONE.

Also Give RR38 influence wpns 3%-6% Crit back instead of 1-2% as well.

https://imgur.com/a/warhammer-online-it ... ck-NY9bkl7

There is UNIVERSAL cloak lvl 39(no renown rank needed) that gives 700 armour proc. There is 66dps wpns With Boost VI proc. If youre not gonna give us Boost VI in wpns, Boost IV-V then. Also lvl 30 belt(no renown rank) with 3 talisman slots? YES PLS.

https://imgur.com/a/warhammer-original-glory-3gwL5FQ

There 2 last pictures show RR38 influence 1h wpn with 3% Crit and Boost V proc. EVERYONE had access to this in rr38 influence wpns. Also First picture back when Imperator/Overlord was truely a great idea. Just bring these things back that already existed before you nerfed them to the ground:E
"To clarify, me asking to developers to go test their own changes is not sign of toxicity or anger, but a sign of hope that the people punching in the numbers remain aware of potential consequences and test their own changes"-Teefz

krumhur
Posts: 39

Re: Upcoming Item Rebalancing

Post#86 » Wed Apr 01, 2026 12:53 pm

live4treasure wrote: Wed Apr 01, 2026 12:02 pm For all those who are complaining about crest refunds, I invite you to think of this as an opportunity to be excited for your next piece of gear again. For many players, this is even the primary motivation to keep playing - well, you will have more of it. It's not a negative thing.
I invite you to consider that:
1) on one hand, those who get exited for their next piece of gear will get what they want regardless of the refund or not: from what we've been told, the patch will require all of us to reconsider our equipment in any case!
2) on the hand, those who don't get exited for their next piece of gear will lose hours upon hours of commitment for nothing in return if no refund is going to happen.

I don't belong to either of those categories but it's pretty clear to me that a war crests refund can only be a good thing, with only positive consequences and no drawbacks, so I don't see why one should oppose to it other than to be a naysayer.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests