Should we have a T1 server for RoR
Forum rules
Before posting in this forum, please read the Terms of Use.
This section is for providing feedback and sharing your opinions on what could be improved or changed for the Return of Reckoning project.
To ensure your feedback is as helpful as possible, please review the Rules and Posting Guidelines before posting.
Before posting in this forum, please read the Terms of Use.
This section is for providing feedback and sharing your opinions on what could be improved or changed for the Return of Reckoning project.
To ensure your feedback is as helpful as possible, please review the Rules and Posting Guidelines before posting.
Should we have a T1 server for RoR
just want to see if anyone approves this suggestion
Chosen: Roten Plaguelord rr86 | Knight of the Blazing Sun: Lyntyz Jesterknight rr63
I'm not a clown, I'm the whole circus.
I'm not a clown, I'm the whole circus.
Ads
-
- Posts: 486
Re: Should we have a T1 server for RoR
i thinks its not a good idea to split the population of the server
Re: Should we have a T1 server for RoR
What would be the point of a T1 server? Just make a "T1 account" if you are out character slots.
Nekkma / Hjortron
Zatakk
Smultron
Zatakk
Smultron
Re: Should we have a T1 server for RoR
polls.... seems like the new tool
ontopic: nope we do not need an extra server for it - it would remove ppl from the lake and
if you wanna play an eternal T1 - you can do it - yes you need to delete/recreate the char
on and on but hey - its something.
ontopic: nope we do not need an extra server for it - it would remove ppl from the lake and
if you wanna play an eternal T1 - you can do it - yes you need to delete/recreate the char
on and on but hey - its something.
- Bowldancer
- Posts: 302
Re: Should we have a T1 server for RoR
You don't give any context. What do you even mean by that ? Anyway a clear no.
Grimmsch Grimnirsson (2H Slayer, 40/86)
Several 80s
40+: 2H-CHOPPA, AM, RP, WP, SM, IB, KotBS, WL, WH, BW, ENG, SW
More on the way
Several 80s
40+: 2H-CHOPPA, AM, RP, WP, SM, IB, KotBS, WL, WH, BW, ENG, SW
More on the way
Re: Should we have a T1 server for RoR
Rather than a T1 server I think that the tier divisions should be adjusted to accommodate the fact that there are so many players near or at end gear. After leveling two alts since lvl 16'rs were thrown in with the 40s I think that there should be zones that are specifically for those that are levels 16-39.
Suggested idea:
T1-stays as is
T2 (and maybe T3)-16 to 39
T4, Forts & Cities-40
Something has to happen because I and others are getting very tired of grinding up toons while bashing heads against far superior geared players. Then throw in the population sways and mechanic games that both realms are playing and it just becomes a joke.
Suggested idea:
T1-stays as is
T2 (and maybe T3)-16 to 39
T4, Forts & Cities-40
Something has to happen because I and others are getting very tired of grinding up toons while bashing heads against far superior geared players. Then throw in the population sways and mechanic games that both realms are playing and it just becomes a joke.
Re: Should we have a T1 server for RoR
T1 is godawful. A permanent T1 server would just be melee doks/shamans v AMs/melee WPs. What fun as everyone gravitated towards the overperforming low level classes....
Detangler and alts - 84 Chosen, other 40s - DoK, Zealot, SH, WE, BG, BO
Destro - Mostly Harmless
Tangler and alts - 8X IB, other 40s - RP, SM
Order - Most dishonorable
Destro - Mostly Harmless
Tangler and alts - 8X IB, other 40s - RP, SM
Order - Most dishonorable
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests