Recent Topics

Ads

Pierce Defenses on Destruction.

We want to hear your thoughts and ideas.
Forum rules
Before posting on this forum, be sure to read the Terms of Use

In this section you can give feedback and share your opinions on what should be changed for the Return of Reckoning Project. Before posting please make sure you read the Rules and Posting Guidelines to increase the efficiency of this forum.
Auzor
Posts: 46

Re: Pierce Defenses on Destruction.

Post#11 » Thu Jun 24, 2021 8:01 am

Mulling things through:

Engineer vs Magus:
Engineer has Pierce Defenses, and so does Shadow Warrior. mkay.

But if the tooltips are correct, Engineer has another advantage: signal flare gives -5% dodge AND block.
Withered Soul 'only' gives -5% interrupt.

How about, asymmetric buffing:
Shift the effect to Baleful Transmogrification (has no cooldown), and make it give -10% disrupt & block?
No AoE capability, worse than PD, better than Signal Flare; doesn't require a tactic slot; and unlike Withered Soul (& signal flare), there's no cooldown, so you can apply it every time you target swap.

---------------------------------

I still think a bunch of Magus tactic deserve to be looked at for how many affect Flickering Red Fire / Surging Violet Fire; vs the 'main' spells, like Blue Flame, Bolt of Change, Indigo Fire, Firestorm, and any of the spells inside Daemonology besides Infernal Blast...

Ads
Auzor
Posts: 46

Re: Pierce Defenses on Destruction.

Post#12 » Thu Jun 24, 2021 8:03 am

Mulling things through:

Engineer vs Magus:
Engineer has Pierce Defenses, and so does Shadow Warrior. mkay.

But if the tooltips are correct, Engineer has another advantage: signal flare gives -5% dodge AND block.
Withered Soul 'only' gives -5% interrupt.

How about, asymmetric buffing:
Shift the effect to Baleful Transmogrification (has no cooldown), and make it give -10% disrupt & block?
No AoE capability, worse than PD, better than Signal Flare; doesn't require a tactic slot; and unlike Withered Soul (& signal flare), there's no cooldown, so you can apply it every time you target swap.

---------------------------------

I still think a bunch of Magus tactic deserve to be looked at for how many affect Flickering Red Fire / Surging Violet Fire; vs the 'main' spells, like Blue Flame, Bolt of Change, Indigo Fire, Firestorm, and any of the spells inside Daemonology besides Infernal Blast...

Or the turret placement that really could be instant by default and I don't see any imbalance out of it; for both Engineer & Magus.

Littleone
Posts: 36

Re: Pierce Defenses on Destruction.

Post#13 » Thu Jun 24, 2021 8:14 am

A better solution would be to redesign exploding arrer ability for SH. Currently, it is an ornamental point on mastery tree that no SH uses. Make it a spammable or channeling aoe ability, or redesign the tactic to something else (thanks to previous nerfs there are many tactics not used by SHs anymore) and give exploding arrer PD debuff.

ururu
Posts: 17

Re: Pierce Defenses on Destruction.

Post#14 » Thu Jun 24, 2021 8:54 am

Lots o'Arrers seems like a perfect candidate to be turned into aoe with a tactic. It's a channeled cast that requires line of sight for whole duration. Which means, if you wanna do damage - you'll be vulnerable to damage as well. SWs could be given same treatment tbh. BHA ninjas no more.

paperclipdog
Posts: 100

Re: Pierce Defenses on Destruction.

Post#15 » Thu Jun 24, 2021 10:09 am

ururu wrote: Mon Jun 21, 2021 10:09 am [...]i would suggest moving PD over to Magus[...]
Magus is more than fine. PLEASE stop asking for more Magus buffs like the whole pet surviveability thing... Havoc already got nerfed 20% because Changing became easy to play in City.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Dajciekrwi, Google Adsense [Bot], Stinksuit and 126 guests