peterthepan3 wrote:I am open minded. I don't mind OrVr.
It's when people say things like:
"Sorry Mr. Warcamp guardian, that is the WAR and by the sounds of it you lack the true end-game experience and joy of wiping 100+ pugs with one min-maxed 2-2-2 grouped wb. Compared to that what happens on scens/pve is somewhat not important.

"
...that bothers me.
And spare me the lecture mate. I respect Fct from King's Own, but the rest of you trying to justify bomb warbands as requiring coordination/lots of skill etc. is just exaggerating. You know very well that it isn't that hard to beat anything that moves if you're in a WB with 8 BWs all using the morales at the same time.
I don't mind you guys in your warbands and stuff, honestly. But let's not try to fool anyone.
Another statement you made is claiming 200v200 is not the real pvp or should not be seen as pvp, it doesnt mean cause it's not what YOU prefer that its obsolete, it's still pvp.
you also mentioned bombing requires no skill or coördination, like really again oblivious statements piling up.
Bombing in no way shape or form requires an equal amount of skill as 6v6 engagements, does it require MORE coördination ofcourse it does you are trying to have 24 people function as a whole unit how is that not coördination.
Bombing is the most effective way to get rid of an far higher amount of players (pugs) then ST will ever be, organized warbands counter it by using challenge and rotating tank morale's , again requires coördination, setting up the group for it to not die when building morales , using it on time not using it perfectly gets you killed and wb wipes again coöridnation.
the nail in the coffin is generalization you respect Fct yet you diminish everyone else, King's own tag doesnt mean you like bombing, it does not mean we all hate 6 mans.
Also it was not meant as a lecture nor meant as shitposting, it's what i have percieved from the posts you made towards anything not 6 man related!
