[POLL] What RvR system did you enjoy the most?

[geezereur]

VP with no pubblic quest and sc for the win.

I would like this also.

[Sulorie]

sul you may want to consider add a malus(inverse aao)/bonus(aao) system that is my concept to how block keep trading, you could remove rewards based on aao to make keep drade worthless.

Btw the thing of flags give points seems like the old capital city, it would still help more the zerg side cos they just have to take 3 nearest flags (TM for exemple) and the ratio it's 3:1, also if 1 keep>= lock ppl will always zerg in the end and that's the real problem. That's why i support the vp system.

Preparing one zone without opposition gives no rewards and takes a lot time. Saying this, the incentive to do it would be much lower.
Negative aao is a punishment and I don't agree on it. Think about your main being order and because other ppl switch to your side you should get reduced rewards? Not fair.
Having less opponents to kill already reduces your rewards.

You can't zerg the keep, I already dealt with it.

The required score btw is only a way to slow down the rvr without adding lame resource carriers. When you have collected enough points, which is easier for the underdog, then the normal keep siege requirements are in effect.

[WarXL]

First of all, sorry for my English I'll try to express my idea.

In overall, I like idea of the various factors (except pve), which together affect on zone capture.
As one of these factors, I propose to explore the idea of capturing castles. What we have now, don't fit the idea of the castle as a powerful fortification, which is very difficult to conquer.

Make the difficulty of the conquest of the castles dependent on the population ratio. The more one side is outnumbered in the zone, the harder to take the castle (or/and BO) for another side. The difficulty should be expressed not in longer time to break the gates or beat the lord of the castle - that will change nothing. But you can do the lord of the castle the stronger, the greater the numerical superiority of enemies (more damage, more health, when a certain threshold of population ratio reached - powerful AoE abilities). Same increase to the strength and number of other mobs defending the castle. The idea is to make taking the castle with a small number of defenders (players) to be almost as hard as if it was protecting by as many people as attackers. In case of very large numerical superiority, strength of mobs increased so that the capture of the castle requires pretty coordination.
And defenders need good rewards to have a reason to protect castle. BUT no rewards for AFKing in the zone.

In my opinion, this would greatly increase the challenge for RVR, and therefore the interest.

And please don't turn the game to casual ****. ROR is the last breath of air in the genre of RVR-focused MMO games with the background of General simplification for the sake of lazy retards who do not understand class they play, didn't spent any efforts to learn the game but they want to be in equal conditions with skilled players who have shown interest in game mechanics, have spent efforts and time on learning the classes and game, and have arms rising not from ass (but without the extremes of course).

[DirkDaring]

Resource carriers where lame, all you had were people afk botting inside keeps on 3rd floor, and other scrubs afk botting at RvR lake Warcamp edge, to farm renown ticks from zone wide renown ticks from resource carriers.

[Thalmus]

Come on guys- resource carriers sucked ar*e. Each zone was basically a borefest where everyone just queued for sc's until a few determined players ( usually a guy called Blackbyrd) did all the tedious setting up of resource carriers until the enemy keep was ready for taking and then the Zerg would show up.
Was much more fun when both keeps were captureable by both sides and could be claimed and upgraded by guilds. And you needed both keeps and all bo's to lock zone

[Ridduk]

Havent read through the whole thread but my suggestion would be to rotate these systems every so many weeks if thats possible and obviously with prior notification from the devs.

This keeps things from getting stale.

[magicthighs]

You realise you've necroed a 6 month old thread, right?

[Ridduk]

You realise you've necroed a 6 month old thread, right?

Its still relevant. I want my idea implemented as well as a statue of me in IC and Altdorf.

[Shibirian]

I hope everyone who voted for resource carriers was either seriously drunk or drugged while placing their vote.

Then again there were people who voted for Ronald Regan and Maggie Thatcher too...

[Dwanex]

There are people voting for Donald Trump. Everything is possible!