charlysixb wrote:I was there! And even losing i got lot of fun, really a lot. There were crashes on both sides and good order morale bombs on stairs ( got me there ) just before the lord was killed. Nice day guys!
You too! Thanks!
charlysixb wrote:I was there! And even losing i got lot of fun, really a lot. There were crashes on both sides and good order morale bombs on stairs ( got me there ) just before the lord was killed. Nice day guys!
If what i say was true i don't think it would have been fixed. As i don't say it is a huge imbalance. its not enough to be game breaking so it would not be something that would be high on the priority list. Some do claim there is a huge difference. That order classes is OP compared to destro. That i agree is BS.bloodi wrote:Well, one has a cleanse, the other does not, however, since is a game based around group compositions, lets take a look at DoK and what brings to the group, group cleanse and his cleansing m2, there isnt such a thing as a cleansing m2 on order, at all, so should we compare bw to sorc or should we compare a destru group to an order group? Its the later.Buttbeard wrote:That's one example of order classes being maybe not stronger but in this case able to bring more utility to the group than the destro counterpart. So yeah order do have a bit "stronger" ranged classes.
But yeah there is some people that goes way to far when claiming destro classes sux and order being OP. so much it turns into Bs.
Bw has a healdebuff, sorc has a group wide damage buff, Bw can spec a ranged kd, sorc has a base ranged disarm. Order has ranged kd available but almost no wounds debuffs, destruction doesnt have ranged kds at all but they have plenty of wound debuffs.
There is nuances to everything, the mere fact that despite trying their hardest, you can go and check the declined section of the proposal forums, destruction players are somehow unable to point this imbalances and keep coming back to either appeal to the mirror, fallacies or just cherry picking and telling half truths.
If what you say was true, it would have been solved long ago, the thing is, game is a lot more balanced that people give it credit for, they rather pretend is not to tell themselves they are playing in the losing team.
What are you talking about?Daknallbomb wrote:aww cant here dat order does these or destru are these and so on when u guys will learn that order and destru are nearly the same players -.-
*edit* and order dont won the zone cause awesome teamwork or something after keep take from order destru went afk thats all so order got keep back . we had ONE wb after keep take we had ONE grp
Don't be so salty. Just say: Good fight! seeya in the lakes!ToXoS wrote:What are you talking about?Daknallbomb wrote:aww cant here dat order does these or destru are these and so on when u guys will learn that order and destru are nearly the same players -.-
*edit* and order dont won the zone cause awesome teamwork or something after keep take from order destru went afk thats all so order got keep back . we had ONE wb after keep take we had ONE grp
Order won because of "sheer perseverance" and superior intelligence.
Not because destro had 120 % AAO...
I don't feel salty tbh. Like I already said, I didn't took part in the fights in KV.Kragg wrote:Don't be so salty. Just say: Good fight! seeya in the lakes!ToXoS wrote:What are you talking about?Daknallbomb wrote:aww cant here dat order does these or destru are these and so on when u guys will learn that order and destru are nearly the same players -.-
*edit* and order dont won the zone cause awesome teamwork or something after keep take from order destru went afk thats all so order got keep back . we had ONE wb after keep take we had ONE grp
Order won because of "sheer perseverance" and superior intelligence.
Not because destro had 120 % AAO...
Just try it.
Users browsing this forum: Alhazredd and 12 guests