same thing, someone in our group have lock rewards someone no.aa91837 wrote:Something broken again? zone lock-no exp/rr/medals.
Patch Notes 02/02/2018
Forum rules
Before posting on this forum, be sure to read the Terms of Use
Before posting on this forum, be sure to read the Terms of Use
Re: Patch Notes 2/02/2018
Ads
Re: Patch Notes 2/02/2018
I still remain 2 hours in praag taking obj, killing players and the lord keep.. on lock i received no influ, no renown and i rolled 2 with the classical cow ****.... this system is not clear, why my contribuition is so useless? Is this the right way to reward correctly the players who contributes activelly in rvr? For me is only an annoying way to leave the pvp maps.
- wargrimnir
- Head Game Master
- Posts: 8387
- Contact:
Re: Patch Notes 2/02/2018
I like how rewarding R16 players with RR45 gear somehow became the norm in your minds and is perfectly acceptable there. What an interesting development. I hope you're all not too difficult in accepting the changes, because your arguments to revert them are embarrassing.
Re: Patch Notes 2/02/2018
Imho, rewards should be tied not to level, but RR.wargrimnir wrote:I like how rewarding R16 players with RR45 gear somehow became the norm in your minds and is perfectly acceptable there. What an interesting development. I hope you're all not too difficult in accepting the changes, because your arguments to revert them are embarrassing.
For example, my zealot (below 40) is RR52, which makes her Conquest ready since a while.
Re: Patch Notes 2/02/2018
Rewards should be based on who you're fighting. Fight conq wearers get conq. Fight t2 level people get soldiers. Just as it was on live. Reward based on challenge.

Re: Patch Notes 2/02/2018
Im high on RR but the things that personally bothering me atm is contributing AF in zone for couple hours or more and beside the Lord renown tick im getting nothing from the zone lock; Renown wise.wargrimnir wrote:I like how rewarding R16 players with RR45 gear somehow became the norm in your minds and is perfectly acceptable there. What an interesting development. I hope you're all not too difficult in accepting the changes, because your arguments to revert them are embarrassing.

]
- wargrimnir
- Head Game Master
- Posts: 8387
- Contact:
Re: Patch Notes 2/02/2018
Alas, we are not like live. When you go out into the lakes as R16, you get a more significant bolster provided you wear gear appropriate for your level. Which is why it's important to win and wear, gear your level. If you try to scrub your way through in low level gear, you're gonna have a bad time.Telen wrote:Rewards should be based on who you're fighting. Fight conq wearers get conq. Fight t2 level people get soldiers. Just as it was on live. Reward based on challenge.
Re: Patch Notes 2/02/2018
Hello, i'm currently R38 RR55 and I got a gold bag from the last T4 session in DW (The mail with the bag stated Caledor tho). I toke a screenshot of the content of the gold bag(5 Officer Medallion, nothing else not even 1 silver) is it working as intended ?


Ads
- Fallenkezef
- Posts: 1491
Re: Patch Notes 2/02/2018
I think there is a bug on T1. Was getting 530xp a tick holding the boat in Nordland.
Went from 15 to 16 in a few minutes.
Went from 15 to 16 in a few minutes.
Alea iacta est
Re: Patch Notes 2/02/2018
YEs , I will be possible with patcher , but if we do , we will only add new texture that are lore friendly .Darosh wrote:On the notion of standards:Grunbag wrote:Standard will give granted abilities and you’ll put tactic buff on it .... laterAnomanderake wrote:Sry, I can’t find the info... what are the standards supposed to do?
For now it’s just a role play thing
Would it be possible to allow for player created emblems (ofc, that would require some supervision or RoR would be riddled with various, colorful recreations of male genitals...in an instant upon implementation), or to expand on the emblems ingame in another way (maybe a new art contest *cough*)?
I guess client control and some and such would be required, not to mention that it'd be far off any priority ~ so just asking whether it has been considered yet.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest