Patch Notes 20/4/2018

[mogt]

if you want that, then play sc, in the rvr the strategy is very important, the people, just want zerging without strategy and that is the biggest mistake from the players, the ideas frpm the devs are good, but many players want go the easiest way, to get rr and medals, and that is fault, if they players want fight without strategy, then they can go in the sc,

[Darosh]

Someome whip Sulle' into a frenzy to code an toggle-esque addon for all the PQ/Dungeon related stuff, pretty please.

[Hargrim]

Someome whip Sulle' into a frenzy to code an toggle-esque addon for all the PQ/Dungeon related stuff, pretty please.

Huh?

[Darosh]

Someome whip Sulle' into a frenzy to code an toggle-esque addon for all the PQ/Dungeon related stuff, pretty please.

Huh?

Grunbag
As a general rule : make sure to enable : User Settings / interface / Center Screen Message / Quest enabled, this might help you in Chap 22 lord fight, and for future Dungeons / PQ bosses

Also, Utility stuff; granted abilities what-have you. I am a lazy person, my apologies.

[Hargrim]

You mean an addon that enables chat channels or smtn?

[Akalukz]

Onslaught will be probably the only raid PvE set . Like every single new set we introduce , the first weeks are horrible because everyone is trying at the same time and zerg bosses . I am sure that later you'll be able to form a warband and get your onslaught with your guild mate .

We don't force anyone to play PvE if they don't want to , you are advised that we will add wards to next dungeons , so you better run gunbad if you want bloodlord, dark promised, tyrant or any other dungeon set .

As long as Dark Promise, Tyrant , etc are exceptionally better than the RvR / Scenario sets then I don't think people will mind. It's when having BiS for each tier be the PVE set that it becomes an issue for most. That was part of the problem with Live PVE sets, they were generally better than the RvR sets. Love everything you guys are doing!

[Sulorie]

Onslaught will be probably the only raid PvE set . Like every single new set we introduce , the first weeks are horrible because everyone is trying at the same time and zerg bosses . I am sure that later you'll be able to form a warband and get your onslaught with your guild mate .

We don't force anyone to play PvE if they don't want to , you are advised that we will add wards to next dungeons , so you better run gunbad if you want bloodlord, dark promised, tyrant or any other dungeon set .

As long as Dark Promise, Tyrant , etc are exceptionally better than the RvR / Scenario sets then I don't think people will mind. It's when having BiS for each tier be the PVE set that it becomes an issue for most. That was part of the problem with Live PVE sets, they were generally better than the RvR sets. Love everything you guys are doing!

As long as it is BiS for some classes, people will do it. PVE sets were never BiS for all classes on live.

[Raggaz]

What about BOs being like battle for praag or gromgril crossing?
Only the BOs are random in which are open and are completed in a random 1-4 sequence.
Each time a BO in the sequence is taken you get a 1/2star or 1 star.
Each time all BOs captured, the BOs reset and each get a new random number.

Or maybe number of BOs open on the map is determined by number of players in the zone.

0-55 players = 1 BO open
56 - 75 players = 2 BOs open
76 - 95 players = 3 BOs open
96+ players= 4 BOs open.

Very difficult to get anything going with only 1 wb for each side. Everyone just getting ganked by the other WB. No actual battles take place and the overall zone progression is stunted.

Each BO would have a 30sec capture time(like right click on the bo to capture), long enough for an emeny to interrupt them.
Re-capture time for a captured BO would be very short, like 1sec. This way stealthers could sneak in and re-take it very fast.
Each BO would have a 5 minute lock time. Each BO would have have a big area of effect around it 500-1000ft?(maybe more). If an enemy player is within this area the 5min timer for the BO stops.
If there is continuous fighting within the area of the BO the timer would not count down. 5 minutes could easily turn into 30+ minutes.

This forces EVERY BO to be fought for, the enemy cant just run in and run off they have to stay and lock the BO. There would be fighting for every BO.

if you want that, then play sc, in the rvr the strategy is very important, the people, just want zerging without strategy and that is the biggest mistake from the players, the ideas frpm the devs are good, but many players want go the easiest way, to get rr and medals, and that is fault, if they players want fight without strategy, then they can go in the sc,

Tell me how this system wouldnt be strategic? If you are on when there is only 1 wb for each side nothing happens. 1 WB runs around the map killing everyone, there is no fighting anywhere taking place.
The system is fine but it needs to be adjusted to lower populations as well.

Having a lord HP that also stacks with current people in the zone would allow for a smaller size population to also take a keep.

[Darosh]

You mean an addon that enables chat channels or smtn?

Rather a makeshift UI solution for PvE relevant elements, either as settings toggler or with actual custom made (but ofc, abstracted and modifyable) elements (e.g.: SoR-esque workaround) ~ to bridge the time until client control is a thing and you are able to redo the clunky stock UI and ship/update the client with it, without prompting 'third party' shenanigans (i.e. addons).

I, for example, have most things; some of the settings (e.g.: print notifications) and junk UI elements, turned off to reduce visual noise created by things that are irrelevant in 90% of the game.

Note, in case I've been a bit to banterish: This is a suggestion for a QoL change ~ that you folk likely thought about already, so, take it as inquiry as to whether/where it is on your list of things ~ not a demand, or w/e.

[Adell]

Is Wall of Darting Steel gonna be exclusively a SM ability forever?