For AoE WH this:
http://waronlinebuilder.org/#renown;000 ... 1000000000
offensive tactics if u have guard or strong group:
RoR.builders - Witch Hunter
defensive tactics if u dont have guard or strong group:
RoR.builders - Witch Hunter
For AoE WH this:
Yes, i basically never respec, unless for 6man premade.
So I don’t know why you would talk about your averages or bonuses as a WH/WE to killing tanks.... lol I mean if you’re targeting those types of targets you’re playing bad. The things being dicussed are stat choices for targetable classes SH,WE,Sorc,most Maras. The reasoning for only counting the -100 toughness debuff to tanks is lol. The 100 STR increase of 7-8% would not be such VS a tank maybe a 2% increase.Atropik wrote: ↑Sat Dec 23, 2017 8:33 amLets be honest, its all about math, id say, even about arithmetic. And arithmetic says, its all the time better to have +100 str and +100 ws over -100 tough proc, which may proc and may not.Adelmar wrote: Again, it's all up to what your playstyle/build is. Full Conq is by no means bad, it just relies on a proc to showcase the full dps potential, as does the pistol in question. When both proc on the opener though...
Here we have some facts like:
- Toughness itself is a worthless stat game has, and being debuffed by amount of 100 you will recieve like 1-1,5% more damage on every hit, depending on what class you are. Dont be blind here, by losing 100 str from 1000 to 900, you lower you overall dps by 7-8%.
- Some classes (bg, bo etc.) may have the incredible amout of toughness and that way the effectiveness of -100 tough debuff may be redused to -0.000000001% dmg mitigation on proc.
- Its generaly better to have static buff on your own, mostly because you have to fight different enemies, and not only one who was debuffed,
- The other allied classes may aoe-debuff stats, makin you proc not only weak but laughable.
- etc.
I have to sorry for some arrogance that might be shown, arguing over trivial stuff makes me offensive.
Users browsing this forum: diegomess and 4 guests