Recent Topics

Ads

Despicable behavior

Talk about topics unrelated to Return of Reckoning or Warhammer.
Forum rules
Before posting on this forum, be sure to read the Terms of Use
User avatar
Abe
Posts: 34

Re: Despicable behavior

Post#21 » Fri May 31, 2019 3:17 pm

DanielWinner wrote: Fri May 31, 2019 3:14 pm The other funny thing I read yesterday was that after few hours Order had locked that zone and had got a fort with free bags after all. So, people just wasted their time when they could have got a fort and killed Order there with greater renown and invader bags. Seemed like someone just refused to get a help.
Most likely someone has to learn the hard way.
Nice to see the moderator maintaining a modicum of neutrality.

Ads
User avatar
CoffeeForAll
Posts: 57

Re: Despicable behavior

Post#22 » Fri May 31, 2019 3:18 pm

Some people have apparently forgotten that we are not supposed to collude with the enemy, which is the only thing that I can possibly describe as what happened in BC. You may think that giving up BC was the right thing to do for "you", as you need invader medallions, but the destro realm is more than just you, and to be perfectly honest, I think the majority of the destro in that zone enjoyed defending more than they would have by everyone just giving up and handing the zone over to order.

I'm appalled by the slander that is being thrown at UE, and I can't for the love of me figure out why the posts in questions haven't been spoilered, with the users being provided a warning for their behaviour.

If you believe that people are violating the rules, then perhaps you should take it to a GM, rather than bringing it up on the forum. Some of you proclaim others act like children, yet here we are.

-Aronax

User avatar
CountTalabecland
Posts: 1025

Re: Despicable behavior

Post#23 » Fri May 31, 2019 3:23 pm

Here’s a thought, stop handing our fort rewards like candy. No guaranteed medallions and no medallions for PvLord. People are playing Order for the easy wins. Mindless zerg=profit. No one likes losing or having to work twice as hard trying to put up a decent doomed defense. Of course intentionally losing BC to get a fort is the right move because it is the quickest way to get the highest level gear in the situation.
Brynnoth Goldenbeard (40/80) (IB) -- Rundin Fireheart (40/50) (RP) -- Ungrinn (40/40) (Engi)-- Bramm Bloodaxe (40/83) (Slayer) and a few Empire characters here or there, maybe even an elf.

User avatar
DanielWinner
Posts: 727
Contact:

Re: Despicable behavior

Post#24 » Fri May 31, 2019 3:27 pm

Spoiler:
Abe wrote: Fri May 31, 2019 3:17 pm
DanielWinner wrote: Fri May 31, 2019 3:14 pm The other funny thing I read yesterday was that after few hours Order had locked that zone and had got a fort with free bags after all. So, people just wasted their time when they could have got a fort and killed Order there with greater renown and invader bags. Seemed like someone just refused to get a help.
Most likely someone has to learn the hard way.
Nice to see the moderator maintaining a modicum of neutrality.
I am free to have my personal, player opinion. For everything else we have forum rules and I operate by them when I act as a moderator.
Ripliel - Shadow Warrior.
Riphael - Black Guard.

Very Serious Warhammer Online Montage
Spoiler:
Gotcha
Image

User avatar
peterthepan3
Posts: 6509

Re: Despicable behavior

Post#25 » Fri May 31, 2019 3:27 pm

CountTalabecland wrote: Fri May 31, 2019 3:23 pm Here’s a thought, stop handing our fort rewards like candy. No guaranteed medallions and no medallions for PvLord. People are playing Order for the easy wins. Mindless zerg=profit. No one likes losing or having to work twice as hard trying to put up a decent doomed defense. Of course intentionally losing BC to get a fort is the right move because it is the quickest way to get the highest level gear in the situation.
QFT. Invader acquisition is an affront to all other forms of gear acquisition, and needs to be either temporarily disabled, or changed ASAP.

Why on Earth should I have to nerd it out in Gunbad & Sentinel, or SC, while Invader is given out like free candy?
Image

User avatar
Abe
Posts: 34

Re: Despicable behavior

Post#26 » Fri May 31, 2019 3:30 pm

Sooooooooooo if a high level order character allows me (destro) to kill him over and over again to raise my realm rank level that would be the "smart" thing to do according to many posters. No you say, but it is ok to lay down on more global scale. It is the same thing folks

mubbl
Posts: 277

Re: Despicable behavior

Post#27 » Fri May 31, 2019 3:34 pm

Abe wrote: Fri May 31, 2019 3:30 pm Sooooooooooo if a high level order character allows me (destro) to kill him over and over again to raise my realm rank level that would be the "smart" thing to do according to many posters. No you say, but it is ok to lay down on more global scale. It is the same thing folks
Next step is we all have to quit our jobs, send families and friend in exil and play the game without food and drinks till we die.... :roll:

User avatar
peterthepan3
Posts: 6509

Re: Despicable behavior

Post#28 » Fri May 31, 2019 3:37 pm

Abe wrote: Fri May 31, 2019 3:30 pm Sooooooooooo if a high level order character allows me (destro) to kill him over and over again to raise my realm rank level that would be the "smart" thing to do according to many posters. No you say, but it is ok to lay down on more global scale. It is the same thing folks
What is the destro getting out of this theoretical situation you posited? Nothing.

What are destro (and order) getting out of letting the enemy take the Fort easily? Invader medallions/gear.
Image

Ads
User avatar
DanielWinner
Posts: 727
Contact:

Re: Despicable behavior

Post#29 » Fri May 31, 2019 3:38 pm

Abe wrote: Fri May 31, 2019 3:30 pm Sooooooooooo if a high level order character allows me (destro) to kill him over and over again to raise my realm rank level that would be the "smart" thing to do and clearly according to many posters. No you say, but it is ok to lay down on more global scale. It is the same thing folks
There are different things. You tried to interpreted it as like destro should have gone there and died feeding order something so fort would happen (actually that's what destro did -- in some way -- wasted time feeding order renown and stuff so they also could get a winnable fort later). But in fact it was the same as like basic tactic of not engaging 1v5 and die 10 times in a row trying to get some objective but postpone a fight and win it with much higher chances. I know, it's a hard concept and we have players that do first thing on a constant basis.
Ripliel - Shadow Warrior.
Riphael - Black Guard.

Very Serious Warhammer Online Montage
Spoiler:
Gotcha
Image

User avatar
Abe
Posts: 34

Re: Despicable behavior

Post#30 » Fri May 31, 2019 3:46 pm

DanielWinner wrote: Fri May 31, 2019 3:38 pm
Abe wrote: Fri May 31, 2019 3:30 pm Sooooooooooo if a high level order character allows me (destro) to kill him over and over again to raise my realm rank level that would be the "smart" thing to do and clearly according to many posters. No you say, but it is ok to lay down on more global scale. It is the same thing folks
There are different things. You tried to interpreted it as like destro should have gone there and died feeding order something so fort would happen (actually that's what destro did -- in some way -- wasted time feeding order renown and stuff so they also could get a winnable fort later). But in fact it was the same as like basic tactic of not engaging 1v5 and die 10 times in a row trying to get some objective but postpone a fight and win it with much higher chances. I know, it's a hard concept and we have players that do first thing on a constant basis.
We defended that fort twice without FMJ ty very much. The two cases are exactly the same on a different scale.
Last edited by Abe on Fri May 31, 2019 3:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests