TenTonHammer wrote: Sun Jul 07, 2019 6:19 pm
[quote=Telen post_id=367285 time=<a href="tel:1562519412">1562519412</a> user_id=645]
Its interesting how the difference in playerbase/playstyle has changed how balance is viewed. On live WL were pretty average and mostly seen as a gank class. Whereas Slayer was king on live. So I dont think theres really a balance problem or it would have been there on live too. Its just players playing differently.
Live didn’t have the master of disaster torq **** up balance so hard the ramifications are still felt to this day
Also many peoples of perception of live balance is skewed from rr100 sets and broken stuff that was never fixed to the extent that it was no longer a bug but a feature
Remember how in the early days of ror balance discussions everyone though that BO and SM was were dumpster tier cause that’s how they were on live?
Take away the broken sets, fix the bugs and wow both SM and BO are viable second tank options
Well SM is, BO took a real hit to SnB spec after Torque made THC 2H only
[/quote]
personal opinions can be vary.
I'll play current version of RoR over any lives of AoR.
also i prefer torq style than aza.
late version of aza balance seem questionable, sm 2h kd, another stealther escape, sw thing(reverted).
and he brought back zerg morale bomb.
it's just unfinished business, thx to forum warriors witch hunting.
remember how aza was blamed for balance b4 torq?
anyway both talented devs, too bad all gone. I miss his haha no meme.
so stop spreading personal opinion on patchnote like it's something and go to balance forum.
contribute tiny bit compare to volunteering devs.
SM8, SW8, AM8, WL7, KoBS6, BW6, WP8, WH7, IB8, Eng5, RP5, SL6
BG8, Sorc8, DoK8, WE7, Chs8, Mg8, Ze7, Mara8, BO6, SH7, Shm6, Chop4
SC summary -
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=20415
( last update : 2020.06.09)