its more like they didnt know it had a higher AP cost and missed it.
[WL] Cleave limb change
Forum rules
Before posting on this forum, be sure to read the Terms of Use
Your topic MUST start with your class name between hooks (IE : [Shaman] blablabla)
Before posting on this forum, be sure to read the Terms of Use
Your topic MUST start with your class name between hooks (IE : [Shaman] blablabla)
Ads
- agemennon675
- Posts: 538
Re: [WL] Cleave limb change
Probably
Destruction: 40-BG / 40-DoK / 40-Chosen / 37-Mara / 37/Sorc / 36-SH / 36-Choppa / 24-Shaman / 16-WE
Order: 40-SW / 40-SM / 40-WP / 40-WL / 39-Kotbs / 38-BW / 33-AM / 22-WH / 16-RP / 12-Slayer
Order: 40-SW / 40-SM / 40-WP / 40-WL / 39-Kotbs / 38-BW / 33-AM / 22-WH / 16-RP / 12-Slayer
Re: [WL] Cleave limb change
Lol, just spat out my coffee:) made my day!
____________________________________________________________
-
- Posts: 524
Re: [WL] Cleave limb change
Where's the Marauders pet?Mordd wrote: ↑Thu Jul 02, 2020 6:33 pmmarauders have higher damage AND less AP. excuse doesnt hold water.Foofmonger wrote: ↑Thu Jul 02, 2020 6:08 pm WL is given higher AP costs because the pet is free AP-less damage. Was part of the original design.
There is no "excuse", I'm literally explaining to you how the classes were designed. You simply don't understand the point being made. The WL pet is a source of "ap less" damage, what about this is confusing?
Re: [WL] Cleave limb change
your base damage on the snare is higher than all of the others. All of the rest of the snares have a common base value of 139, the marauders is higher than the rest at 198. I actually tested this. You dont need a pet you hit harder with the ability than all of the other MDPS classes.Foofmonger wrote: ↑Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:39 pmWhere's the Marauders pet?Mordd wrote: ↑Thu Jul 02, 2020 6:33 pmmarauders have higher damage AND less AP. excuse doesnt hold water.Foofmonger wrote: ↑Thu Jul 02, 2020 6:08 pm WL is given higher AP costs because the pet is free AP-less damage. Was part of the original design.
There is no "excuse", I'm literally explaining to you how the classes were designed. You simply don't understand the point being made. The WL pet is a source of "ap less" damage, what about this is confusing?
If you want to give the WL the 198 damage then the 5ap may be appropriate.
Re: [WL] Cleave limb change
Melee squig herder doesnt have this 5 ap extra cost on its abilities yet it has a pet. Funny that. Either the devs don’t understand why wl have the higher costs or torques bias towards his own class designs are showing again.
-
- Posts: 226
Re: [WL] Cleave limb change
Well the thing is, destro bitches about WL on forums so much they were forced to do at least something. After this and the SW debacle, I can't wait to see order completely derailing the ranged SH rework.
Raid boss Salv WP Guernios - rr83, full Sov
DPS SnB SM Valianoris - rr81, full Sov
DPS SnB SM Valianoris - rr81, full Sov
Re: [WL] Cleave limb change
whatever. slight destro bias here, but the real problem is gtdc being an utterly broken insta undefendable pull and still 'working as intended'. name an ability that insta pulls with impunity that order has. please.
Ads
Re: [WL] Cleave limb change
Magnet should be undefendable, unless you're naked at least.
Re: [WL] Cleave limb change
excuse me?Mordd wrote: ↑Thu Jul 02, 2020 6:33 pmmarauders have higher damage AND less AP. excuse doesnt hold water.Foofmonger wrote: ↑Thu Jul 02, 2020 6:08 pm WL is given higher AP costs because the pet is free AP-less damage. Was part of the original design.
[2 Weeks]/[Definitely Not Heretics]
Kuro Mara R8x
Bunji DoK R6x
Kurodon BG R8x
Curo Whitelion R8x
Scryptmar WP R6x
Aiero Swordwizard R5x
Kuro Mara R8x
Bunji DoK R6x
Kurodon BG R8x
Curo Whitelion R8x
Scryptmar WP R6x
Aiero Swordwizard R5x
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests