AM need 160 int tactic
Forum rules
Before posting on this forum, be sure to read the Terms of Use
In this section you can give feedback and share your opinions on what should be changed for the Return of Reckoning Project. Before posting please make sure you read the Rules and Posting Guidelines to increase the efficiency of this forum.
Before posting on this forum, be sure to read the Terms of Use
In this section you can give feedback and share your opinions on what should be changed for the Return of Reckoning Project. Before posting please make sure you read the Rules and Posting Guidelines to increase the efficiency of this forum.
AM need 160 int tactic
you got the 160 wilpower but if you want to be dps it is hard to get the intel why not give them a 160 int tactic ?
Ads
Re: AM need 160 int tactic
I agree, but then every healer should get the corresponding stat tactic - wp and dok should get the 160 strength one.
Re: AM need 160 int tactic
AM in general needs an overhaul. It's awful to play... Yeah, you can drain some faces off when the target is solo and without healers, but that's pretty much it.
I dont get why a cloth wearing healer has weaker heals than a medium armored healer. WP really got all the goodies. They designed the AM weaker because it should have dps and heals but in reality you can pretty much do only one thing, either heal or dps, since the mechanic is so bad.
The RP trees are also... were they high when they designed this?
The order side is really missing unique stuff. They mirrored everything to destro and nothing back. There really is not much left.
Id love to see SMs with two swords / dual wield. That would be unique and fun and order has anyway less dual wield classes.
And where is that squig bouncing on order side where the whole screen is shacking? Give that to IB.
I dont get why a cloth wearing healer has weaker heals than a medium armored healer. WP really got all the goodies. They designed the AM weaker because it should have dps and heals but in reality you can pretty much do only one thing, either heal or dps, since the mechanic is so bad.
The RP trees are also... were they high when they designed this?
The order side is really missing unique stuff. They mirrored everything to destro and nothing back. There really is not much left.
Id love to see SMs with two swords / dual wield. That would be unique and fun and order has anyway less dual wield classes.
And where is that squig bouncing on order side where the whole screen is shacking? Give that to IB.
Re: AM need 160 int tactic
Honestly game woul be better if nobody had these tactics. They are the most boring tactics in the entire game.
Orkni 85+ (in-game Grock is not me...)
Re: AM need 160 int tactic
Spoiler:
Last edited by NSKaneda on Wed Jan 27, 2021 12:26 am, edited 2 times in total.
RoR: Burszui SH, Ropopuch SHM<|[]|>Ginnar IB, Vidarr HMR, Runatyr RP ++ REV guild ++
Live: Karak Izor -> Karak Norn - Yarpaen IB, Ginnarr SL, Volundr ENG +Ithilmar's Chosen+
* * * playing 19 classes - running out of char slots * * *
Live: Karak Izor -> Karak Norn - Yarpaen IB, Ginnarr SL, Volundr ENG +Ithilmar's Chosen+
* * * playing 19 classes - running out of char slots * * *
Re: AM need 160 int tactic
yes please...lets spoil all those dps healers a bit more... looks like we dont have enough
Re: AM need 160 int tactic
Breaking news, you need no +160 int tactic to hit int cap.
Dying is no option.
Re: AM need 160 int tactic
No.
You're an off-spec healer. Just like a tank shouldn't get a 160 STR tactic, neither should healers get a 160 INT.
You're an off-spec healer. Just like a tank shouldn't get a 160 STR tactic, neither should healers get a 160 INT.
Ads
Re: AM need 160 int tactic
Or get gud? 970 without it, not even in BiS or +24s, not very hard. Finishing my build I’ll be around 1030-1050
Re: AM need 160 int tactic
It's not like you can put your renown into +INT, when you got +10% crit tactic?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests