Witch Hunter.paps wrote:Slayer was only orders DW class? is that bug?
Still not sure how i should to feel about DualWield for WL..
Witch Hunter.paps wrote:Slayer was only orders DW class? is that bug?
Same as about the +57STR dual wielding choppas. Just fix the bug, very simple.noisestorm wrote:Still not sure how i should to feel about DualWield for WL..
So who implemented the 1h weapons for WLs and made them able to dual wield? Wasn't this supposed to be like the original without any changes? Why would somebody "implement dual wield" for WLs?noisestorm wrote:The thing is the weapon are not buggy. There are knowingly 1handed weapons implemented for WLs (unlike the Buggy 2h dual wield some ppl like to abuse)
These have been fixed. Only problem is, if never unequipped them. I unequipped mine and am not able to equip them again. Think devs should have forced everyone to unequip them, when they implemented the fix for them.xyeppp wrote:Same as about the +57STR dual wielding choppas. Just fix the bug, very simple.noisestorm wrote:Still not sure how i should to feel about DualWield for WL..
Nah I'm not complaining, it's not the point.noisestorm wrote:Why even complain about it at the moment? Its nothing gamebreaking like 2x2h. I'd even say they are currently just checking out how this whole thing develops in terms of later class balancing (since we all know some are simply ****). There is a difference if you give someone a chance to dual wield as long as they innately can wear 2handers. It would be something different if you give a SW dual wield, because you do not shift the DPs(2h -> 2x1h), but straight forwardly increase it.
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Nameless and 44 guests