Recent Topics

Ads

Rune of Battle abuse 3/24/2025

Let's talk about... everything else
salazarn
Posts: 178

Re: Rune of Battle abuse 3/24/2025

Post#11 » Tue Mar 25, 2025 9:49 am

I think stuff like this makes the game interesting.

Keep it in or balance it by adjustments don't 'Fun detected' it

Ads
emiliorv
Posts: 1341

Re: Rune of Battle abuse 3/24/2025

Post#12 » Tue Mar 25, 2025 10:09 am

fuadmoru wrote: Tue Mar 25, 2025 8:56 am Yeah it's frustrating and not really fairplay, but you can make 1 party or 2 with bane shield / dire shielding chosens, I bet the WH will not live for a long time.
Sure, lets make an exploiters battle...right now we have:
-Bane shield stacking (destro)
-Rune of battle stacking (order)

Another possible:
-Devour essence stacking (destro): dunno if tested, but another fun if applied on a sthealted WE
-Dissipating energies stacking (order): dunno if tested, but another fun if applied on a sthealted WH

Lets go everyone!! Choose your favorite exploit and fight others

*Someone should review the "normal stacking rules".....

User avatar
Sinisterror
Posts: 1080

Re: Rune of Battle abuse 3/24/2025

Post#13 » Tue Mar 25, 2025 10:32 am

emiliorv wrote: Tue Mar 25, 2025 10:09 am
fuadmoru wrote: Tue Mar 25, 2025 8:56 am Yeah it's frustrating and not really fairplay, but you can make 1 party or 2 with bane shield / dire shielding chosens, I bet the WH will not live for a long time.
Sure, lets make an exploiters battle...right now we have:
-Bane shield stacking (destro)
-Rune of battle stacking (order)

Another possible:
-Devour essence stacking (destro): dunno if tested, but another fun if applied on a sthealted WE
-Dissipating energies stacking (order): dunno if tested, but another fun if applied on a sthealted WH

Lets go everyone!! Choose your favorite exploit and fight others

*Someone should review the "normal stacking rules".....
Devour E/Dissipating are 5s duration and Devour essence hits 5 people and is not even Spirit dmg anymore. Rune of battle is 15s and Bane Shield requires tactic. Maybe the 24 aoe cap is the problem here? Obviously it is but doesnt matter. If these didnt stack, why would Same Hot/Dot from Different players stack?

Why everything powerful that leads to dying must be destroyed? This attitude is exactly the reason we cant have nice things
"To clarify, me asking to developers to go test their own changes is not sign of toxicity or anger, but a sign of hope that the people punching in the numbers remain aware of potential consequences and test their own changes"-Teefz

emiliorv
Posts: 1341

Re: Rune of Battle abuse 3/24/2025

Post#14 » Tue Mar 25, 2025 10:47 am

Sinisterror wrote: Tue Mar 25, 2025 10:32 am
emiliorv wrote: Tue Mar 25, 2025 10:09 am
fuadmoru wrote: Tue Mar 25, 2025 8:56 am Yeah it's frustrating and not really fairplay, but you can make 1 party or 2 with bane shield / dire shielding chosens, I bet the WH will not live for a long time.
Sure, lets make an exploiters battle...right now we have:
-Bane shield stacking (destro)
-Rune of battle stacking (order)

Another possible:
-Devour essence stacking (destro): dunno if tested, but another fun if applied on a sthealted WE
-Dissipating energies stacking (order): dunno if tested, but another fun if applied on a sthealted WH

Lets go everyone!! Choose your favorite exploit and fight others

*Someone should review the "normal stacking rules".....
Devour E/Dissipating are 5s duration and Devour essence hits 5 people and is not even Spirit dmg anymore. Rune of battle is 15s and Bane Shield requires tactic.
Sure these 2 are the best exploits, you are right.

*Rune of battle can be up to 21 secs if using tactic...

User avatar
Gangan
Posts: 658

Re: Rune of Battle abuse 3/24/2025

Post#15 » Tue Mar 25, 2025 11:12 am

Reminds of times when sham-groups could stack 12 ere-we-go on each other and instagib most targets 😊
Pächter des Wahnsinns
Gangan - SH 75 .... Blumnmoscha - BO 63
Scophis - Zealot 73 .... Drengur - WP 64
Iznogoud - Sham 50+ .... Bixo - Engie 50+
Apogemoth - Magus 40+ .... Loarelle - AM 65
originating from Drakenwald

User avatar
Ruin
Posts: 216

Re: Rune of Battle abuse 3/24/2025

Post#16 » Tue Mar 25, 2025 12:05 pm

Or 6 SHs m4 bomb build, that in 30 sec could whipe a full wb.

User avatar
Minisynn
Posts: 214

Re: Rune of Battle abuse 3/24/2025

Post#17 » Tue Mar 25, 2025 12:47 pm

emiliorv wrote: Tue Mar 25, 2025 10:47 am Sure these 2 are the best exploits, you are right.

*Rune of battle can be up to 21 secs if using tactic...
Image

For legal reasons this is a joke (because they're not really exploits lmao)
Engineer enjoyer | Finnbarr/Fionnbharr | Finnmarr/Fionnbharra | Nightmare | Youtube
Image

User avatar
Akalukz
Posts: 1790

Re: Rune of Battle abuse 3/24/2025

Post#18 » Tue Mar 25, 2025 1:02 pm

Should Rune of Battle be able to crit?
-= Agony =-

Ads
User avatar
Ruin
Posts: 216

Re: Rune of Battle abuse 3/24/2025

Post#19 » Tue Mar 25, 2025 1:38 pm

Akalukz wrote: Tue Mar 25, 2025 1:02 pm Should Rune of Battle be able to crit?
It's a skill, see no reason why not?

User avatar
Sinisterror
Posts: 1080

Re: Rune of Battle abuse 3/24/2025

Post#20 » Tue Mar 25, 2025 2:07 pm

Ruin wrote: Tue Mar 25, 2025 1:38 pm
Akalukz wrote: Tue Mar 25, 2025 1:02 pm Should Rune of Battle be able to crit?
It's a skill, see no reason why not?
It should, as should Witchbrew & Leonine Frenzy. Le not critting is kind of crazy since its 13pts Pet skill and pet is the Crit mechanic for Wl. Make Riposte crit again like in Aor + Crit tactics effected riposte as well.
"To clarify, me asking to developers to go test their own changes is not sign of toxicity or anger, but a sign of hope that the people punching in the numbers remain aware of potential consequences and test their own changes"-Teefz

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bing [Bot] and 11 guests