Patch Notes 12/02/2026

[ponko22]

Insted of bring IB group utility in line with other tanks he got his survivability nerf by taking 5% more damage with SnB. I mean... I´m speechless. Seriously. This -15% damage taken was there since live and it never caused an issues even with 1.4.8 (RR100) patch, but suddenly it was an issue now? How? When?

I agree. Why now? As you say, it's inferior to other tanks in utility, so why is it being nerfed without any reward, focusing only on its "toughness"? This patch only lowered motivation.

[Aisha]

Not every day one gets to see their own country used as a theme for an event.
I’d like to thank you guys for all the effort made to put this event together.
Gracias!

[gisborne]

Insted of bring IB group utility in line with other tanks he got his survivability nerf by taking 5% more damage with SnB. I mean... I´m speechless. Seriously. This -15% damage taken was there since live and it never caused an issues even with 1.4.8 (RR100) patch, but suddenly it was an issue now? How? When?

I agree. Why now? As you say, it's inferior to other tanks in utility, so why is it being nerfed without any reward, focusing only on its "toughness"? This patch only lowered motivation.

Yet somehow Vigilance is ok. Go figure.

[Sinisterror]

Insted of bring IB group utility in line with other tanks he got his survivability nerf by taking 5% more damage with SnB. I mean... I´m speechless. Seriously. This -15% damage taken was there since live and it never caused an issues even with 1.4.8 (RR100) patch, but suddenly it was an issue now? How? When?

I agree. Why now? As you say, it's inferior to other tanks in utility, so why is it being nerfed without any reward, focusing only on its "toughness"? This patch only lowered motivation.

Yet somehow Vigilance is ok. Go figure.

Its core tactic. You need to spec 13pts for vigilance + tactic slot for the grp effect. And wtf do you think you achieve by saying these things that are not related to eachother at all in anyway? Is this the ceiling of your critical thinking or do you have an agenda? Besides Vigilance used to be for shield and 2h forever and no one had problem with it until they did.

Stop nerfing singular abilities espesially if you compare them to skills that have nothing to do with eachother. Witchbrew/Leonine Frenzy are not PROCS. Its counter intuitive when you nerf WB/LF to not do crit dmg anymore, and then you make WB not affected by Frenzied mayhem/ToB/Flanking/Masterful Treachery! 13pts ability that is not affected by FOUR TACTICS ffs. Same for Leonine frenzy but Flanking/Loner tactics.

Oh and obviously remove 20% Speed increase and hot tactic for Welf/Wh... come on..

[CountTalabecland]

The continued penalization of Slayer makes no sense.

Especially now that devs are not reverting the 25% penalty to armor. Not only were Slayer/Choppa already squish, this debuff also especially punishes Slayer because AI tactic is armor compared to choppas wounds. Not a great tactic to begin with, now it is reduced by 25% on a class that tends to use Bloodlord for -10% armor already. The point is why make a already bad tactic even worse? How does this help balance?

Not only do you have sub 100 toughness on Slayer, now you tend to be below 3k armor as well. Armor without toughness is already junk to begin with, why are you doubling down on making that even weaker?

The "rework" for this class consisting of just tinkering with tactics and damage and this penalization for just existing as Slayer was a let down to say the least. The class's main drawbacks of zero mobility and weak grp utility were not changed at all (shatterlimbs and gudruns wc being the only two utility skills as it is).

If the point of the class is to offer pure dmg (and no utility, mobility, or support abilities) in return for needing massive amounts of support, then the amount of damage it puts out right now does not compare to other AoE DPS to justify picking slayer. Please go back to the drawing board on this one devs and rework the rework.

[ravezaar]

The continued penalization of Slayer makes no sense.

Especially now that devs are not reverting the 25% penalty to armor. Not only were Slayer/Choppa already squish, this debuff also especially punishes Slayer because AI tactic is armor. Not a great tactic to begin, with now it is reduced by 25% on a class that tends to use Bloodlord for -10% armor already. The point is why make a already bad tactic even worse? How does this help balance?

Not only do you have sub 100 toughness on Slayer, now you tend to be below 3k armor as well. Armor without toughness is already junk to begin with, why are you doubling down on making that even weaker?

The "rework" for this class consisting of just tinkering with tactics and damage and this penalization for just existing as Slayer was a let down to say the least. The class's main drawbacks of zero mobility and weak grp utility were not changed at all.

If the point of the class is to offer pure dmg (and no utility, mobility, or support abilities) in return for needing massive amounts of support, then the amount of damage it does not compared to other AoE DPS just aint there. Please go back to the drawing board on this one devs and rework the rework.

Exactly, this is why I question the balance team. I really dont think they see the details in there balance and how it effects classes. Iv lost all faith in there abilities to balance this game.

[tsavo]

Could you please allow to queue for all scenarios and not only one.

[kpihuss]

I forgot to thank the GMs for putting out such an Estalian event (which is basically Spain in the Warhammer world) and adding so many details from our culture into the game (the bulls, the turrón, the duros, the reales, even the NPC names...).

Next year, it would be great to see Slayers wearing faralaes dresses

[MaxHayman]

Could you please allow to queue for all scenarios and not only one.

This was something we wanted to include. However, it missed the first milestone. It is something that we will work on for a future update.

[MaxHayman]

Thank you for this new patch. You're great at introducing new visual and gameplay changes to the game. Casual players like me have run into the following problem: my bank can't accommodate all the things you're adding to the game. So, I have a favor to ask.
Can you expand players' personal banks by adding at least one tab in each of the capital city banks, similar to the guild bank?

We are investigating ways we can solve this. At the moment it comes down to a client limitation. The per city bank was a way we tried to work around this. We're working on tech debt that might allow us to have a more robust solution in the future.