Recent Topics

Ads

What exactly is considred a "Magic" in WAR ?

Chat about everything else - ask questions, share stories, or just hang out.
User avatar
Coryphaus
Posts: 2230

What exactly is considred a "Magic" in WAR ?

Post#1 » Mon Jul 13, 2015 12:45 am

As i was playing today and appling touch of instability to a BW i couldn't help but wonder; what exactly is considered "magic" in war?

We have tons on abilities that deal spirit, corp, and elemental dmg but are am's, bw's and rp's the ownly ones who uses what the game considers as “true spells”?
Image

Ads
User avatar
Telen
Suspended
Posts: 2542
Contact:

Re: What exactly is considred a "Magic" in WAR ?

Post#2 » Mon Jul 13, 2015 12:49 am

Yes. Magic dmg is based off the intelligence stat. Magic healing willpower. Other classes might have non physical dmg abilities but they are based off their own main stat and cant be disrupted. Strength or Ballistics.
Image

User avatar
Jaycub
Posts: 3130

Re: What exactly is considred a "Magic" in WAR ?

Post#3 » Mon Jul 13, 2015 4:53 am

<Lords of the Locker Room> <Old School>

User avatar
Rebuke
Posts: 388

Re: What exactly is considred a "Magic" in WAR ?

Post#4 » Mon Jul 13, 2015 9:19 am

So by Telen' s definition Swordmaster spirit damage abilities are not to be disrupted? Because it happens ALOT that my Gusting Wind (which I so fondly use :D) gets disrupted, while it should be parried or blocked. Correct me if I am wrong though.

User avatar
CarlistRieekan
Posts: 237

Re: What exactly is considred a "Magic" in WAR ?

Post#5 » Mon Jul 13, 2015 9:30 am

Some info can be found here.
Image

User avatar
Azarael
Posts: 5332

Re: What exactly is considred a "Magic" in WAR ?

Post#6 » Mon Jul 13, 2015 9:32 am

Rebuke wrote:Because it happens ALOT that my Gusting Wind (which I so fondly use :D) gets disrupted, while it should be parried or blocked.
It's slightly different here. Gusting Wind and Wrath of Hoeth are defended against by Parry, but if parried, they will count as if they were Disrupted. The change was only because of how weird it was to have explosions being parried.

User avatar
Zealote
Posts: 456

Re: What exactly is considred a "Magic" in WAR ?

Post#7 » Mon Jul 13, 2015 9:33 am

@Rebuke I think it should be str-based so you shouldn't be able to disrupt it. It might just be a problem with the combat log though in the same way as it will often say you've parried a ranged attack: http://www.returnofreckoning.com/forum/ ... f=8&t=4355

Edit: Cross-posted. @Azarael What about any of abilities/tactics/etc that require a disrupt - would they become available if you parried, e.g., Gusting Wind but it's treated as a disrupt by server?
Aetir

User avatar
Azarael
Posts: 5332

Re: What exactly is considred a "Magic" in WAR ?

Post#8 » Mon Jul 13, 2015 9:39 am

Yeah, they would.

Ads
User avatar
Zealote
Posts: 456

Re: What exactly is considred a "Magic" in WAR ?

Post#9 » Mon Jul 13, 2015 9:46 am

That's a bug then, right? :P Don't know if there are any abilities it affects atm (so might not be important) but it'd matter later on, e.g. with BG's movement speed increase on disrupt - particularly if block triggers it as well.
Aetir

User avatar
Rebuke
Posts: 388

Re: What exactly is considred a "Magic" in WAR ?

Post#10 » Mon Jul 13, 2015 9:58 am

Azarael wrote:
Rebuke wrote:Because it happens ALOT that my Gusting Wind (which I so fondly use :D) gets disrupted, while it should be parried or blocked.
It's slightly different here. Gusting Wind and Wrath of Hoeth are defended against by Parry, but if parried, they will count as if they were Disrupted. The change was only because of how weird it was to have explosions being parried.
Ah ok cool, thanks for the explanation! Is Wrath of hoeth a spirit damage based attack? Tooltip says normal damage, same goes for eagle' s flight, Quick Incision, intimidating blow and crushing advance. So far I have noticed that no improved stance abilities have the words " Spirit Damage" in the tooltip. Is this correct or just a slight inconsistency?

Thanks.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests