SC should not be allowed to start with uneven sides

[Scambug]

It doesn't happen often but on occasion the scenario manager allows uneven matches to start, ie: 6vs7, 10vs11 etc.
The outnumbered side will almost always lose and if you refuse to join you get the quitter debuff.
This should be changed in my opinion. No more uneven matchups. It's already hard enough to have even sides with ppl not joining when the match pops, this rule just adds to the problem.

[Dabbart]

Depends if they have the ability to input something like that. But I agree, it would be nice to have a 30sec extension on start time if sides are bad, or less than 6 took the pop on one side. If it isn't rectified, just end SC as unbalanced.

Having said that. I don't believe I would support extending the start timer based on players hitting "give me a minute". If you are choosing to enter late, that's on you and your side should face the consequences.

[Genisaurus]

It doesn't happen often but on occasion the scenario manager allows uneven matches to start, ie: 6vs7, 10vs11 etc.
The outnumbered side will almost always lose and if you refuse to join you get the quitter debuff.
This should be changed in my opinion. No more uneven matchups. It's already hard enough to have even sides with ppl not joining when the match pops, this rule just adds to the problem.

FWIW, scenarios start uneven because people have decided not to join them. Those people who ruined your scenario were given the quitter debuff.

[Scambug]

How is that possible Genisaurus, since you only get to decide if you join or not after the scenario manager has announced the match. Are they people who log out while still in a scenario queue? If so shouldn't the scenario manager automatically remove them from the q?
I are confused :/

[Daknallbomb]

Na He mean If a sc pops there are on both sides even ppl. But If one dont accept now what ever Wy IT starts uneven But The one who dont accept get The quitter debuff