City Siege 12 vs 12 and 18 vs 18

[adapter]

Oi Oi

Since this last week i've noticed that some cities are played by a smaller number of players than the usual. Some are 12 vs 12, some are 18vs18. And you know, I felt like it's better this way, the less number of players, the higher the chances of having a competitive city siege. The less AoE spamm too. It's less chaotic and there's chances for Single Target careers to shine.

I don't see it as an issue, i see it as a possible fix to balance out the topic about careers that don't have a "warband spot". This way, a less crowded City Siege opens up new metas which is awesome.

[Dabush]

Agree 100%! Just had a 12v12 city and it was one of my favorite cities I’ve ever experienced (Full sov character)! All 12 people got bags though which is cool but kinda unbalanced.

[Martok]

Just my opinion but I think a 12 v 12 in a city would be an enjoyable diversion. You know, something unique.

[Thorelson]

Agreed - had a 15vs15 twice this week in the last city instance and it was a blast both times.

[yoluigi]

15vs15 for pug queue would be fun

[ClemmonGrab]

Did you guys queue solo or as a 6/12/18 man?

[yoluigi]

Had a blast doin pug 12vs12 was very even each side i think for pug that's pretty much the solution.

[Arcrival]

Not a real solution it’s still random the city I did was 13 vs 14 and we had one healer a WP. We lost the other side had 2-2-2 but one was definitely a PUG group. Point is 12 vs 12 pug vs. pre-made is still a butt kicking depending on what you get going solo que. however I would agree with lower numbers making it slightly more manageable but the outcome is the same.

[StrongUn]

Agree 100%

The less populated instances, the funnier, also 6 v 6 could be a good idea

[orillah]

1v1 the true showcase of skill