Do the Devs have the capability to modify a weapon type to increase the rate it can proc something?
Example being an effect with a 20% chance to proc on attacks, using a two-handed increases the chance to 30%.
Dual Wield and Greatweapon balance
Forum rules
Before posting in this forum, please read the Terms of Use.
This section is for providing feedback and sharing your opinions on what could be improved or changed for the Return of Reckoning project.
To ensure your feedback is as helpful as possible, please review the Rules and Posting Guidelines before posting.
Before posting in this forum, please read the Terms of Use.
This section is for providing feedback and sharing your opinions on what could be improved or changed for the Return of Reckoning project.
To ensure your feedback is as helpful as possible, please review the Rules and Posting Guidelines before posting.
Ads
Re: Dual Wield and Greatweapon balance
I think it would be easier to implement an internal cooldown for procs (can only proc once per second or once every two seconds etc.).
Re: Dual Wield and Greatweapon balance
On paper, that sounds good. But some procs, such as Guilty Soul, rely on stacking on multiple targets and would be immensely gimped if they couldn't proc more than once. Though, ironically, the same tactic is gimped already because it has no internal cool down on its single target proc-rate.Luth wrote:I think it would be easier to implement an internal cooldown for procs (can only proc once per second or once every two seconds etc.).
Re: Dual Wield and Greatweapon balance
Hm, maybe the internal cooldown could also be reset on target switch, if this is a problem (dunno if possible though).
Re: Dual Wield and Greatweapon balance
My other problem with this 'solution' is it amounts to "X isn't as good as Y, so let's make Y worse."Luth wrote:Hm, maybe the internal cooldown could also be reset on target switch, if this is a problem (dunno if possible though).
I'd rather see two-handed made on par with dual-wield, than dual-wield weakened to be on par with two-handed.
Re: Dual Wield and Greatweapon balance
Some can even say that the upside of 2handers is that they give the access to the 2hander requiring abilities 

Вальтер Рыжий RU => Gaziraga BW, Valefar WL, Lovejoy
Retired
ex-Greenfire/Invasion RvR leader
Wonderful RvR music videos
Retired
ex-Greenfire/Invasion RvR leader
Wonderful RvR music videos

- PartizanRUS
- Posts: 612
Re: Dual Wield and Greatweapon balance
I always thought that to compensate for procs and additional damage of dual wield, great weapons need increased DPS. I doubt thet bonus few percent can be an issue, but Mythic never changed great weapons and let dual-wield be OP.ThePollie wrote: I'd rather see two-handed made on par with dual-wield, than dual-wield weakened to be on par with two-handed.
Burn heretics and mutants, purge the unclean. ingame - Partizan . Hammer of Sigmar guild [RUS]
https://i.imgur.com/Un7WASp.jpg




Re: Dual Wield and Greatweapon balance
In keeping with two-hander's prospect of burst damage, granting it a bonus to damage could work. But like a lot of people have said, White Lions already have "a lot of burst", and giving them even more could be problematic. Still, I hear they fall off heavily in T4, but then again things won't be the same as Live. I expect our Devs will do better than Mythic's, so we won't be seeing much of the game-breaking crap that plagued live, so White Lions may end up being fine in T4.PartizanRUS wrote:I always thought that to compensate for procs and additional damage of dual wield, great weapons need increased DPS. I doubt thet bonus few percent can be an issue, but Mythic never changed great weapons and let dual-wield be OP.
While time consuming, I suspect it may be better to handle two-handers on a class-by-class basis, if possible.
Ads
Re: Dual Wield and Greatweapon balance
I agree that balance is a class by class process. I don't think itemisation should be used to balance classes though.
- PartizanRUS
- Posts: 612
Re: Dual Wield and Greatweapon balance
Devs can modify 2h weapons dps based on level "bracket"-tier, so I think that won't be a big problem. Time consuming - maybe.ThePollie wrote:In keeping with two-hander's prospect of burst damage, granting it a bonus to damage could work. But like a lot of people have said, White Lions already have "a lot of burst", and giving them even more could be problematic. Still, I hear they fall off heavily in T4, but then again things won't be the same as Live. I expect our Devs will do better than Mythic's, so we won't be seeing much of the game-breaking crap that plagued live, so White Lions may end up being fine in T4.PartizanRUS wrote:I always thought that to compensate for procs and additional damage of dual wield, great weapons need increased DPS. I doubt thet bonus few percent can be an issue, but Mythic never changed great weapons and let dual-wield be OP.
While time consuming, I suspect it may be better to handle two-handers on a class-by-class basis, if possible.
Burn heretics and mutants, purge the unclean. ingame - Partizan . Hammer of Sigmar guild [RUS]
https://i.imgur.com/Un7WASp.jpg




Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests