Mendozza wrote:Gown up ussles ass leecher.Ghostweed wrote:Do u even read bro, or u just posting random ****?Mendozza wrote:"i wanna have my reward for doing nothing".
OY VEY
Next time try to actually kill some one or take BO.
Introducing EC and CW (basically #1 in my proposal above) alone will not be sufficient. Wingz and I already agree that the outcome of this will be very few to zero pops. Many people on this forum want to puff their chest and claim they are ready for 6v6 que's... the reality is that it will die to zero pops in a very very short time. As evidenced in other games...and especially due to the small population, their will be an alpha 6man group...and once it becomes apparent they are que'ing... all other 6man groups will magically disband into trio's/duo's/solo's etc... and go play the non 6man only sc's. This will inevitably happen.Genisaurus wrote: I know that you know that this is something we're working toward. I've publicly said as much in the past, and we've been internally discussing the feedback we received over EC as the 6v6 scenario over CW. These scenarios will be showing up very soon. And like everything else, if this addresses the group composition problems more than the archetype-matchmaking, or the latter somehow interferes with the former, we'll roll it back.
How did you get to that conclusion my friend?mursie wrote:wild popularity it will bring to the game
It is an opinion. One that in an alpha game I would like to experiment with.Scrilian wrote:How did you get to that conclusion my friend?mursie wrote:wild popularity it will bring to the game
again you didn't read my proposal - to be expected.DefinitelyNotWingz wrote:If I get it right people that put effort into the game by building a grp are meant to suffer?
Great.
Dont forget to balance 1on1 since grps will always be of a random setup in your dream world there is no need for synergies.
My fault for not being clear - I meant that all points of your comment are in the works, including a solo-queue only scenario.mursie wrote:Introducing EC and CW (basically #1 in my proposal above) alone will not be sufficient. Wingz and I already agree that the outcome of this will be very few to zero pops. Many people on this forum want to puff their chest and claim they are ready for 6v6 que's... the reality is that it will die to zero pops in a very very short time. As evidenced in other games...and especially due to the small population, their will be an alpha 6man group...and once it becomes apparent they are que'ing... all other 6man groups will magically disband into trio's/duo's/solo's etc... and go play the non 6man only sc's. This will inevitably happen.Genisaurus wrote: I know that you know that this is something we're working toward. I've publicly said as much in the past, and we've been internally discussing the feedback we received over EC as the 6v6 scenario over CW. These scenarios will be showing up very soon. And like everything else, if this addresses the group composition problems more than the archetype-matchmaking, or the latter somehow interferes with the former, we'll roll it back.
I am not saying you shouldn't offer it. But please - #2 also needs to be introduced.
If you have higher incentive to group up and pvp... yet people would rather not do it... that should tell you something wingz.DefinitelyNotWingz wrote:You can increase the reward to over9k, if nobody queues, nobody is rewarded.
Fair enough. I will stop posting about this topic then. Thanks for your time.Genisaurus wrote: My fault for not being clear - I meant that all points of your comment are in the works, including a solo-queue only scenario.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests
