Recent Topics

Ads

[Warrior Priest] Discussion approved by Inquisition

Knight of the Blazing Sun, Bright Wizard, Witch Hunter, Warrior Priest
Forum rules
Before posting on this forum, be sure to read the Terms of Use
Your topic MUST start with your class name between hooks (IE : [Shaman] blablabla)
User avatar
PartizanRUS
Posts: 612

[Warrior Priest] Discussion approved by Inquisition

Post#1 » Tue Jan 12, 2016 12:32 am

Thread where discussion approved by Inquisition.

Image

Image
Spoiler:
Image


Image

Image


Image

Image
Image
Burn heretics and mutants, purge the unclean. ingame - Partizan . Hammer of Sigmar guild [RUS]
Image https://i.imgur.com/Un7WASp.jpg Image Image

Ads
User avatar
TenTonHammer
Posts: 3806

Re: [Warrior Priest] Discussion approved by Inquisition

Post#2 » Tue Jan 12, 2016 12:45 am

If i can voice my honest opinion about heal/clense bot WP's (and DoK's ofc) If you are just going to be in the backlines healing like every other healer then like every other healer you should have light armor.

Chalice and books should debuff your armor values or something so its the equivalent of light because its a lower risk playstyle and not what medium armor was ment for.

It should be reserved for front-line mDPS WP and DoK
Image

User avatar
magter3001
Posts: 1284

Re: [Warrior Priest] Discussion approved by Inquisition

Post#3 » Tue Jan 12, 2016 12:50 am

you should put all those in spoiler :/
Agrot 35/40 Aggychopp 32/40
Grelin of Magnus/Badlands ;)

User avatar
Shanell
Posts: 278

Re: [Warrior Priest] Discussion approved by Inquisition

Post#4 » Tue Jan 12, 2016 1:01 am

TenTonHammer wrote:If i can voice my honest opinion about heal/clense bot WP's (and DoK's ofc) If you are just going to be in the backlines healing like every other healer then like every other healer you should have light armor.

Chalice and books should debuff your armor values or something so its the equivalent of light because its a lower risk playstyle and not what medium armor was ment for.

It should be reserved for front-line mDPS WP and DoK
Or their heal shoul be debuffed, to make them fight in close combat
BG Kecis | Magus Zechariah | Chosen Kastul
Image

User avatar
PartizanRUS
Posts: 612

Re: [Warrior Priest] Discussion approved by Inquisition

Post#5 » Tue Jan 12, 2016 1:04 am

magter3001 wrote:you should put all those in spoiler :/
No.
TenTonHammer wrote:If i can voice my honest opinion about heal/clense bot WP's (and DoK's ofc) If you are just going to be in the backlines healing like every other healer then like every other healer you should have light armor.
Chalice and books should debuff your armor values or something so its the equivalent of light because its a lower risk playstyle and not what medium armor was ment for.
It should be reserved for front-line mDPS WP and DoK
Die heretic.
Burn heretics and mutants, purge the unclean. ingame - Partizan . Hammer of Sigmar guild [RUS]
Image https://i.imgur.com/Un7WASp.jpg Image Image

User avatar
Ridduk
Posts: 333

Re: [Warrior Priest] Discussion approved by Inquisition

Post#6 » Tue Jan 12, 2016 3:00 am

TenTonHammer wrote:If i can voice my honest opinion about heal/clense bot WP's (and DoK's ofc) If you are just going to be in the backlines healing like every other healer then like every other healer you should have light armor.

Chalice and books should debuff your armor values or something so its the equivalent of light because its a lower risk playstyle and not what medium armor was ment for.

It should be reserved for front-line mDPS WP and DoK

Apple and oranges comparison tbh. rf/se are alot more difficult to manage than ap based heals, not to mention the kiting tools that am/shams have(not sure about rp/zeal on that subject). With that being said, i do think that am/sham and zeal/rp should be using light armor instead of robe for defensive(heal)gear.

User avatar
Custonello
Posts: 37

Re: [Warrior Priest] Discussion approved by Inquisition

Post#7 » Tue Jan 12, 2016 10:19 am

Well how you play your warrior priest is totaly up to one self, Playing it with medium armor and on the front lines can be scary effective if the player is good. But it's also complete useless if a person does not know how to play front line WP.
Image

User avatar
Lileldys
Posts: 666

Re: [Warrior Priest] Discussion approved by Inquisition

Post#8 » Tue Jan 12, 2016 10:22 am

Ridduk wrote:
TenTonHammer wrote:If i can voice my honest opinion about heal/clense bot WP's (and DoK's ofc) If you are just going to be in the backlines healing like every other healer then like every other healer you should have light armor.

Chalice and books should debuff your armor values or something so its the equivalent of light because its a lower risk playstyle and not what medium armor was ment for.

It should be reserved for front-line mDPS WP and DoK

Apple and oranges comparison tbh. rf/se are alot more difficult to manage than ap based heals, not to mention the kiting tools that am/shams have(not sure about rp/zeal on that subject). With that being said, i do think that am/sham and zeal/rp should be using light armor instead of robe for defensive(heal)gear.
You know that robe=light armour right?

Ads
User avatar
dviella
Posts: 23

Re: [Warrior Priest] Discussion approved by Inquisition

Post#9 » Tue Jan 12, 2016 10:34 am

TenTonHammer wrote:If i can voice my honest opinion about heal/clense bot WP's (and DoK's ofc) If you are just going to be in the backlines healing like every other healer then like every other healer you should have light armor.
The Class of WP/DoK isnt just about heal. It is about melee heal or something about DPS. So the robe armor is where it should be.

The bitter spawn of night crawls from darkness to posses the world for eternity to come. Fools! Take refuge in faith or flee into the depths of madness, for no other hidding place remains. The Realm of Chaos has begun.

User avatar
Markosiz
Posts: 50

Re: [Warrior Priest] Discussion approved by Inquisition

Post#10 » Tue Jan 12, 2016 10:41 am

there is a VERY large thread on the WP atm

http://www.returnofreckoning.com/forum/ ... 15&t=10385

worth checking out, i expect a lot of points have already been covered in that thread.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests