peterthepan3 wrote:Oh boy...
first and foremost - when/where did I take credit for it? at the very least I would say that due to the ideas renork, myself, and other people put forward, these changes were -partially- conceived. all credit, of course, goes to the devs - but I didn't see you offering many suggestions.
1) Magus with WF could do respectable damage, and with LOTD stuff. Given that: a) WF won't be in the game; b) LOTD will not be/some gear won't be available, I don't understand why you'd mention them?
2) Before we proceed, I must inquire as to what the 'right' direction is for a class that: hasn't a definite role; gets outperformed by other classes in almost everything except rift. If boosting the single-target damage as a TEMPORARY BANDAID (as I have said various times) until a class overhaul can be discussed is a bad thing - then okay.
3) You mentioned you like the 5 second stagger, and then went on to say "But at the same time, thinking that the 5 sec buff, along with everything else you want, as being necessary to fix Magus/Engi, just goes to show why so many people fail at them with Single Target." There is not relevance between the two whatsoever, hence my inquiring.
5) I didn't say that they don't; more, if you are spec'd single-target then that is where your priority lies. Changing and Daemon are a lot more attuned to AOE than Havoc; Havoc IS the single-target tree. That doesn't say you can't use your aoe dots (you should when given opportune moments to do so); but your focus will be 1/2 dots and trying to burst people down. I don't understand why you can't grasp this.
6) As a Havoc Magus on live, I know how the burst rotation works - but thanks anyway. Bolt of Change takes 3 seconds to cast, you will cast a SOI and then follow up with a SVF at the exact time for maximum damage - all in all taking around 6 seconds (not including time for DOTs to be applied). If you're using FRF at R40 ST DPS spec then you are doing it wrong. Two words: Surging Power.
I petition for the class to have some changes, that is all. The Magus isn't TERRIBLE; but has no role, nor niche - outside of riftbot. You are just another silent ninja who will say nothing until the moment beneficial changes are implemented, and THEN shout down people for -actively- trying to buff a class that needs it.
I think I saw you in a scenario a few days ago, and if that was indeed you then perhaps you should not be so vocal here.
You keep using stagger as a means of correcting me, implying for some reason that I ever said I don't like the change (or wasn't one of the first people on Live to even ask for it) thus being why all my other statements must apparently be incorrect. It's another straw man argument, and it's bad.
1) This is just trolling now. You know it wasn't the focus of the point, it was in addition to the real point being that BoC was fine as is, and potentially even OP with all of it's advantages. WF just happened to make a hard hitting spell hit even harder. Haven't said anything about it since, but you keep bringing it up. Just stop.
2) I and others (for years now) have already stated what the right direction is: more effective dots, better pet scaling, possible buff to "pet buff", despite the troll here I'll repeat it one last time.
And thank you for again proving my point that you believe Magus to be "oh so underpowered", so let's buff what YOU think it needs, being someone who claims it's your main, and yet think it sucks so damn bad.
The temporary bandaid is fine, I never said it wasn't. Use a different argument besides putting words in my mouth for once please.
3) Exactly that, I was simply pointing out that I liked the buff to stagger, whereas you kept telling me I didn't somehow, stating all my "negativety, must means I'm against it!!!" Against your suggestions yes, but it's a good thing the Devs didn't go with those, now did they?
5) Priority yes, exactly my point. However what you said, word for word was "No, if you're focused on ST then you're focusing on ST - same applies to AOE." And have repeatedly beaten that horse to death, as wrong as it is. So tell me, why are you suddenly changing your tune? Now you're essentially agreeing with me, and asking me why I can't grasp my own logic?
Magus is one class that can and should use BOTH AoE and ST in almost every situation, and swap back and forth between the two, on the fly.
6) Oh so you do understand some basic rotations. Certainly sounds a lot better than your "2 dots, 2 dd, done" 6-7s rotation that you said was all you needed. And here I thought you only understood rifting, since "that's all Magus is useful for" mr havoc magus on live.
Yes, SOI is great to use as well as FRF not just at rr40 but at anything higher. Obviously you wouldn't be just spamming FRF, but you know better than to suggest that's what I'm implying, don't you.
As well, a lot of the time (but not always) a rotation would have SOI on cooldown by this point to interrupt healers before the final burst hits, or did you forget once again that numbers and raw damage aren't the only things that exist in this game? It can certainly be used how you said as well (for the interrupt OR dmg). But I'm glad we agree your original rotation was wrong.
Surging power is my favorite tactic too, next to close quarters, but thanks for the tip.
Oh you saw my undergeared fresh to T3 rr25 Magus pugging in an SC?
Actually I'm quite certain I haven't played him in over 3 weeks to level my usual alts, and have done exceedingly well in the ones I did play, even despite pug/rank/gear. But nice try buddy. With you the term "forum warrior" comes to mind for some reason...
And if you'll notice, I haven't said anything negative to anyone else because the majority of their suggestions are pretty on point and seem to understand the class. I've made plenty of threads and replies for suggestions to both magus and engi in the past, and even stated that I was about to do the same on here before YOU pointed out that we should "all refrain from doing so until we're ready to fully discuss balance in T4". Which is a good idea.
Nice job countering your own logic though, again. But hey, let's keep arguing because egos are more far important than balance, right?