Recent Topics

Ads

Isn't lvl35 too much?

We want to hear your thoughts and ideas.
Forum rules
Before posting on this forum, be sure to read the Terms of Use

In this section you can give feedback and share your opinions on what should be changed for the Return of Reckoning Project. Before posting please make sure you read the Rules and Posting Guidelines to increase the efficiency of this forum.
User avatar
Shibirian
Posts: 107

Isn't lvl35 too much?

Post#1 » Sun Feb 21, 2016 10:26 pm

I do remember from my final weeks on live as how the over-powered players in t1-t3 simplay walzed over the new players coming to that new tier. That was bad. Now here it seems to be (temporarily) maybe back to these times?

Lvl 14-26 for t2 is a bit much, don't you think?
"I am Grace, too. But roll a healer if you need healing..." - Tudik (WP@SC)

"I've heard it reported but do not know how to reproduce." - Azarael

Image

Ads
Dabbart
Posts: 2251

Re: Isn't lvl35 too much?

Post#2 » Sun Feb 21, 2016 10:33 pm

We shall see how it works out. I think T1 is going to be the worst. lvl 13s are gonna steam roll. Entering t3 at 27 is kinda neat though. You should be most of the way to stalker by then.

I think it will be fine. And it is only temporary anyways.
Azarael wrote: It's only a nerf if you're bad.

(see, I can shitpost too!)
Secrets wrote: Kindly adjust your attitude to actually help the community and do not impose your will on it. You aren't as powerful as you think.

User avatar
Dunzo
Posts: 9

Re: Isn't lvl35 too much?

Post#3 » Sun Feb 21, 2016 10:34 pm

I think its a smarter move then going "full ham" if you will, meaning atleast they are doing it right imo going in small intervals. This should help with too much of a power gap, and should be easy to "play catch up" I would think. So all in all I feel they are doing fine with 35.

User avatar
Arbich
Suspended
Posts: 788

Re: Isn't lvl35 too much?

Post#4 » Sun Feb 21, 2016 10:34 pm

lvl 35 is excellent, because you get a new skill at this lvl.

I think they set the different tiers so that everyone could have stalker-gear in T3. It is not that bad, I think.

Maybe they could give the keep-lords a bit more bäm because of the higher players in t3.
Arbich-BW/Xanthippe-WP/Schnipsel-AM

User avatar
roadkillrobin
Posts: 2773

Re: Isn't lvl35 too much?

Post#5 » Sun Feb 21, 2016 10:39 pm

The gap bewteen 22-32 in t3 was much larger then 14-26 t2 ever gonna be. And there's almoast no premades or fixed groups in t2. The only thing i personally don't like is that you're pretty much forced to play t2 from 22-26 now Wich imo isn't very fun. It would be nice if I could play my alts in t3 from 22. And had the option to play t2 up to lvl 26 aswell.
Image

alfa77
Posts: 6

Re: Isn't lvl35 too much?

Post#6 » Sun Feb 21, 2016 10:41 pm

on live server was t1: 1-15, t2: 12-26, t3: 23-39. i dont think, that new caps are bad. besides here is few good fights and you level up fast.

User avatar
Swolv7
Posts: 116
Contact:

Re: Isn't lvl35 too much?

Post#7 » Sun Feb 21, 2016 10:42 pm

Gotta think about the Positives, the Higher levels could be on your Team and not the Enemies ;)
>>Blender Artist<< >>Drawing & Sketching<< >>Texturing<<
Ingame Character: Conker Lvl. 32 Chosen <NAZGUL>

Image

User avatar
maggii
Posts: 28

Re: Isn't lvl35 too much?

Post#8 » Sun Feb 21, 2016 10:44 pm

roadkillrobin wrote:The gap bewteen 22-32 in t3 was much larger then 14-26 t2 ever gonna be. And there's almoast no premades or fixed groups in t2. The only thing i personally don't like is that you're pretty much forced to play t2 from 22-26 now Wich imo isn't very fun. It would be nice if I could play my alts in t3 from 22. And had the option to play t2 up to lvl 26 aswell.
I agree^^ And I think we had the same system from 32-39 the option to play in T3 and T4 until ding 40. (memory is a bit blurry) :mrgreen:

edit:
alfa77 wrote:on live server was t1: 1-15, t2: 12-26, t3: 23-39. i dont think, that new caps are bad. besides here is few good fights and you level up fast.
I thought that system were good :)
Image
Isak Malek R.i.P [2003-2013]

Ads
User avatar
RangedKD
Posts: 6

Re: Isn't lvl35 too much?

Post#9 » Sun Feb 21, 2016 11:04 pm

Don't forget that in the death throes of live, XP-off books allowed players to twink out in the lower tiers so the power gap you recall is not what you have on RoR. (It was especially bad in T1 where you had free to play players facing off against level 15 twinks with full dungeon gear farmed by their mains).

I have alts spread across all tiers here on RoR and I think it will be okay.
Nalishar -- Sorceress
Niznar -- Shaman
Snagz -- Squig Herder
Xorjiela -- Zealot

User avatar
Shibirian
Posts: 107

Re: Isn't lvl35 too much?

Post#10 » Sun Feb 21, 2016 11:15 pm

maggii wrote:
roadkillrobin wrote:The gap bewteen 22-32 in t3 was much larger then 14-26 t2 ever gonna be. And there's almoast no premades or fixed groups in t2. The only thing i personally don't like is that you're pretty much forced to play t2 from 22-26 now Wich imo isn't very fun. It would be nice if I could play my alts in t3 from 22. And had the option to play t2 up to lvl 26 aswell.
I agree^^ And I think we had the same system from 32-39 the option to play in T3 and T4 until ding 40. (memory is a bit blurry) :mrgreen:

edit:
alfa77 wrote:on live server was t1: 1-15, t2: 12-26, t3: 23-39. i dont think, that new caps are bad. besides here is few good fights and you level up fast.
I thought that system were good :)
That was so horrible, I don't have words...
"I am Grace, too. But roll a healer if you need healing..." - Tudik (WP@SC)

"I've heard it reported but do not know how to reproduce." - Azarael

Image

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest