I do remember from my final weeks on live as how the over-powered players in t1-t3 simplay walzed over the new players coming to that new tier. That was bad. Now here it seems to be (temporarily) maybe back to these times?
Lvl 14-26 for t2 is a bit much, don't you think?
Isn't lvl35 too much?
Forum rules
Before posting on this forum, be sure to read the Terms of Use
In this section you can give feedback and share your opinions on what should be changed for the Return of Reckoning Project. Before posting please make sure you read the Rules and Posting Guidelines to increase the efficiency of this forum.
Before posting on this forum, be sure to read the Terms of Use
In this section you can give feedback and share your opinions on what should be changed for the Return of Reckoning Project. Before posting please make sure you read the Rules and Posting Guidelines to increase the efficiency of this forum.
Isn't lvl35 too much?
"I am Grace, too. But roll a healer if you need healing..." - Tudik (WP@SC)
"I've heard it reported but do not know how to reproduce." - Azarael

"I've heard it reported but do not know how to reproduce." - Azarael

Ads
Re: Isn't lvl35 too much?
We shall see how it works out. I think T1 is going to be the worst. lvl 13s are gonna steam roll. Entering t3 at 27 is kinda neat though. You should be most of the way to stalker by then.
I think it will be fine. And it is only temporary anyways.
I think it will be fine. And it is only temporary anyways.
Re: Isn't lvl35 too much?
I think its a smarter move then going "full ham" if you will, meaning atleast they are doing it right imo going in small intervals. This should help with too much of a power gap, and should be easy to "play catch up" I would think. So all in all I feel they are doing fine with 35.
Re: Isn't lvl35 too much?
lvl 35 is excellent, because you get a new skill at this lvl.
I think they set the different tiers so that everyone could have stalker-gear in T3. It is not that bad, I think.
Maybe they could give the keep-lords a bit more bäm because of the higher players in t3.
I think they set the different tiers so that everyone could have stalker-gear in T3. It is not that bad, I think.
Maybe they could give the keep-lords a bit more bäm because of the higher players in t3.
Arbich-BW/Xanthippe-WP/Schnipsel-AM
- roadkillrobin
- Posts: 2773
Re: Isn't lvl35 too much?
The gap bewteen 22-32 in t3 was much larger then 14-26 t2 ever gonna be. And there's almoast no premades or fixed groups in t2. The only thing i personally don't like is that you're pretty much forced to play t2 from 22-26 now Wich imo isn't very fun. It would be nice if I could play my alts in t3 from 22. And had the option to play t2 up to lvl 26 aswell.

Re: Isn't lvl35 too much?
on live server was t1: 1-15, t2: 12-26, t3: 23-39. i dont think, that new caps are bad. besides here is few good fights and you level up fast.
Re: Isn't lvl35 too much?
Gotta think about the Positives, the Higher levels could be on your Team and not the Enemies 

>>Blender Artist<< >>Drawing & Sketching<< >>Texturing<<
Ingame Character: Conker Lvl. 32 Chosen <NAZGUL>

Ingame Character: Conker Lvl. 32 Chosen <NAZGUL>

Re: Isn't lvl35 too much?
I agree^^ And I think we had the same system from 32-39 the option to play in T3 and T4 until ding 40. (memory is a bit blurry)roadkillrobin wrote:The gap bewteen 22-32 in t3 was much larger then 14-26 t2 ever gonna be. And there's almoast no premades or fixed groups in t2. The only thing i personally don't like is that you're pretty much forced to play t2 from 22-26 now Wich imo isn't very fun. It would be nice if I could play my alts in t3 from 22. And had the option to play t2 up to lvl 26 aswell.

edit:
I thought that system were goodalfa77 wrote:on live server was t1: 1-15, t2: 12-26, t3: 23-39. i dont think, that new caps are bad. besides here is few good fights and you level up fast.


Isak Malek R.i.P [2003-2013]
Ads
Re: Isn't lvl35 too much?
Don't forget that in the death throes of live, XP-off books allowed players to twink out in the lower tiers so the power gap you recall is not what you have on RoR. (It was especially bad in T1 where you had free to play players facing off against level 15 twinks with full dungeon gear farmed by their mains).
I have alts spread across all tiers here on RoR and I think it will be okay.
I have alts spread across all tiers here on RoR and I think it will be okay.
Nalishar -- Sorceress
Niznar -- Shaman
Snagz -- Squig Herder
Xorjiela -- Zealot
Niznar -- Shaman
Snagz -- Squig Herder
Xorjiela -- Zealot
Re: Isn't lvl35 too much?
That was so horrible, I don't have words...maggii wrote:I agree^^ And I think we had the same system from 32-39 the option to play in T3 and T4 until ding 40. (memory is a bit blurry)roadkillrobin wrote:The gap bewteen 22-32 in t3 was much larger then 14-26 t2 ever gonna be. And there's almoast no premades or fixed groups in t2. The only thing i personally don't like is that you're pretty much forced to play t2 from 22-26 now Wich imo isn't very fun. It would be nice if I could play my alts in t3 from 22. And had the option to play t2 up to lvl 26 aswell.
edit:I thought that system were goodalfa77 wrote:on live server was t1: 1-15, t2: 12-26, t3: 23-39. i dont think, that new caps are bad. besides here is few good fights and you level up fast.
"I am Grace, too. But roll a healer if you need healing..." - Tudik (WP@SC)
"I've heard it reported but do not know how to reproduce." - Azarael

"I've heard it reported but do not know how to reproduce." - Azarael

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests