Palitelj wrote: Wed Jul 04, 2018 9:02 am PQs difficulty is really different on both sides/pairings. If you can do 1 pq in 15 mins and for other you need almost hour it is clearly different. But maybe they are meant to be like that we dont know.
Quite clearly what I wrote had nothing to do with the amount of bags. The problem is that parties in warbands seem to miss the roll completely at random to make space for solo leechers. Might just be that you don't see the roll at all when pq ends if you didn't get a bag, but that part is on the team. And yes, the roll is 100% confirmed to dissapear even for people that played properly from the beginning of the PQ without leaving the PQ areas.wargrimnir wrote: Wed Jul 04, 2018 7:55 amThis is bad feedback. Nothing useful. Mostly vague negative statements. We don't need this.lefze wrote: Wed Jul 04, 2018 7:52 am There is pretty much always someone not getting a roll, even if they played from stage one and didn't die/release. It's consistent enough to make it seem like there is a set amount of spots on the roll in addition to a set amount of bags.
Anyways, after playing all PQs except Caledor, I can say that the difficulty of the PQs are insanely varied. For order CW and BC were both pretty damn hard, about the same difficulty as KV for destro. Eataine and Reikland for destro on the other hand are INSANELY easy, they are almost like normal PQs compared to the others.
No idea how terror debuff is supposed to work atm, but it's not even present on all PQs, and is occasionally only present on some people, while not on others. Certain PQs would have been impossible with terror though, especially with partially pug warbands.
There is a set number of bags. It is insanely generous compared to all other implementations. What exactly are you complaining about?
What is missing from the Eataine and Reikland PQ's?
Terror is not a complete thing yet, as we've already said.
They can be mirrored in some way, but they don't actually play the same at all. In practice they are completely different.Hargrim wrote: Wed Jul 04, 2018 10:27 am Reikland is a mirror of CW, so I'm not sure why would it be any easier than CW.
I could ask the same of you, I have no clue what you mean when you say "mirrored", and as such have no idea which difference in the PQs would be relevant to explain. There is only so much you can put into words, so I will record any future runs.
lefze wrote: Wed Jul 04, 2018 12:03 pmI could ask the same of you, I have no clue what you mean when you say "mirrored", and as such have no idea which difference in the PQs would be relevant to explain. There is only so much you can put into words, so I will record any future runs.
In CW, the constructs are rather hard hitting, they are doable but pugs get absolutely annihilated by the things. The amount of constructs in the PQ and the fact they are in two stages and have to be killed 1-2 at a time already makes it more timeconsuming than Reikland. The boss fight is also way harder as the damage is just much greater, and with the eye kill phase and demon change debuff aggro is gonna go all over the place as people get randomly oneshot, especially if maintank gets it people start dropping like flies. The PQ would probably not have been completed even once by now if terror was active.
The PQ is probably completely fine with a full premade warband, but it's still so much harder than the easy PQs mentioned in the thread. And no, I'm not trying to say that you should make any PQ easier, it's more the opposite. Dwarf PQs are about equally challenging and in a good spot, all pairings should be like them.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 5 guests
