Warhammer Online Wrath of Heroes

[wargrimnir]

We don't have anything to answer. It's not something we do!

Thanks for the kind thoughts.

[berneke91]

Never did play Wrath of Heroes but I thought it looked really tacky and just a slimmed down inferior version of WAR

[adamthelc]

I played wrath of heroes a little, it was alright. It really just made we want to play war though.

Not exactly the same thing, but if you want to play a simplified version of war just do scenarios in T1. It could always use the population boost, the scenarios arent as frequent lately.

[masterdark11]

Never did play Wrath of Heroes but I thought it looked really tacky and just a slimmed down inferior version of WAR

WAR is unbalanced but wrath of heroes was perfect. how can u comment without playing?

[masterdark11]

I played wrath of heroes a little, it was alright. It really just made we want to play war though.

Not exactly the same thing, but if you want to play a simplified version of war just do scenarios in T1. It could always use the population boost, the scenarios arent as frequent lately.

ROR scenarios are boring ,not balanced and not qualified
and they are completely different with WOH matches, they was 6vs6vs6 and balanced.
WOH had different game modes, it had grandeur

[Sulorie]

I played wrath of heroes a little, it was alright. It really just made we want to play war though.

Not exactly the same thing, but if you want to play a simplified version of war just do scenarios in T1. It could always use the population boost, the scenarios arent as frequent lately.

ROR scenarios are boring ,not balanced and not qualified
and they are completely different with WOH matches, they was 6vs6vs6 and balanced.
WOH had different game modes, it had grandeur

Are those the only sentences you can write?

You make the impression of a beggar with a sign in a pedestrian zone who doesn't speak a word of English.

[Ottmar]

Check The "wrath of heroes topic"
they have blocked the topic because they have nothing to answer

Maybe if you'd stuck to just creating one topic you would have been free to discuss this, instead you created a new topic and resurrected two dead topics on the same subject which is generally not appreciated on forums.

Judging by how all three topics went I think it's wise to drop the subject. All three have gone down same route of you calling WOH amazing, everybody else calling it either alright or rubbish, and you telling them that they are wrong. Nothing productive and backs up what multiple people have said that the game was not popular enough to be worth the time & effort to resurrect unless you do it yourself.

[Foltestik]

am i only one who like wrath of heroes?
i realy like that 6v6v6 system scenarios and was happy with only 5 buttons

[Noiree]

WOH was a mistake they made to satisfy the EA overlords and keep WAR rolling. Let that thing rest.

[masterdark11]

I played wrath of heroes a little, it was alright. It really just made we want to play war though.

Not exactly the same thing, but if you want to play a simplified version of war just do scenarios in T1. It could always use the population boost, the scenarios arent as frequent lately.

ROR scenarios are boring ,not balanced and not qualified
and they are completely different with WOH matches, they was 6vs6vs6 and balanced.
WOH had different game modes, it had grandeur

Are those the only sentences you can write?

You make the impression of a beggar with a sign in a pedestrian zone who doesn't speak a word of English.

its because they say the same things so I have to answer with same same sentences