Issue: Both Warlord gear and Sovereign require Royal Crests, renown gap betwen them isn't huge and Sovereign is simply better option, majority of players will simply skip Warlord. In this case, existence of this set is kinda pointless and Dev effort comes to waste.
Possible solution:
- Introduce Warlord medalions and make Warlord oRvR set.
- Give Warlord medallions for zone locks (only when a player wins zone) and won forts, for players above renown rank 70.
Pros:
- Warlord will have its purpose and won't simply be skipped.
- People will have less reasons to throw zones and forts since they still will be able to progress by winning zones.
Cons:
- Less city sieges.
Warlord set
Forum rules
Before posting on this forum, be sure to read the Terms of Use
In this section you can give feedback and share your opinions on what should be changed for the Return of Reckoning Project. Before posting please make sure you read the Rules and Posting Guidelines to increase the efficiency of this forum.
Before posting on this forum, be sure to read the Terms of Use
In this section you can give feedback and share your opinions on what should be changed for the Return of Reckoning Project. Before posting please make sure you read the Rules and Posting Guidelines to increase the efficiency of this forum.
Ads
Re: Warlord set
This is exactly what need to happend... also the "con" isn't really a con. Now it's just thrown fort... ppl who actually want to go to fort now have to push for it (to reap the reward).
Starfkr
Re: Warlord set
Oh please yes. I'd wondered what the point of warlord was anyway, a slightly cheaper and weaker set that takes the same crests as the good set....? Why not just save up another 100 tokens and get the good one?
I don't actually see any cons at all to that proposal.
I don't actually see any cons at all to that proposal.
Wargrimnir - Dear unverified refugees of the skaven ridden dumpster fire we occasionally call "the server"
Re: Warlord set
Totally agree !
it makes a lot more sense!
with regard to "less city siege" it is indeed a problem ... by understanding that: most of the players connecting between 20h( 8pm) and midnight have almost not yet made city siege !!! (the vast majority taking place after midnight ...)
it makes a lot more sense!
with regard to "less city siege" it is indeed a problem ... by understanding that: most of the players connecting between 20h( 8pm) and midnight have almost not yet made city siege !!! (the vast majority taking place after midnight ...)
Last edited by ZEDE on Mon Mar 09, 2020 1:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Warlord set
well i dont even have invader full need tons of farm. maby change something with invader drop? and for warlords need warlord crest , sovereign need royal crest?
p.s miss fort , mean need wait next day.
p.s miss fort , mean need wait next day.
"Iron Within, Iron Without!"
Re: Warlord set
I agree that it would be nice with something inbetween Invader and Sovreign
Re: Warlord set
Simple and good idea! Lets go for it.
Ninjab - The White Lion. RETRIBUTION guild.
Also: Velmires - WP, Carnow - KotbS, Ninjagon - BW, Nynja - SW, Stin - WH, and others.
Also: Velmires - WP, Carnow - KotbS, Ninjagon - BW, Nynja - SW, Stin - WH, and others.
Spoiler:
Ads
Re: Warlord set
Good idea to drop warlord parts on fort gold bags after 70rr
Random PUG
BG 80+, BW 80+
BG 80+, BW 80+