
And as gear is so little diff in those tiers anyway you'd easily win fights using your skill
Why do books any other way?
There was alot of hate because twinks stayed in a tier and farmed lowbies with superior items, renown points and spec when they could progress to the next tier, idk why i have to explain the obvious.Sulorie wrote: I don't know about what general hate towards twinks you are speaking. People stay in tiers to get the best possible renown rank before progressing to the next tier. Where is this twinking? You only farm renown to be ready for the next tier.
It's all about renown rank, because this gives you items.
When a player has better gear, more spec points and more renown points then kills a lower level player what other excuse is there if both players are as good as each other ?Sulorie wrote:Gear gap is such an easy excuse for losing in T2-3. -.-
Guess why T2 was empty. People rushed to T3, grind rats, because T3 locks gave more RP and being R32+, leeching T4 locks was possible as well. Doing this you increase your RR even faster.
I already said something about LotD, so complaining about that is a pretty weak argument.
Khorvald wrote: As I and others have already stated, T1 through T3 will eventually have population issues no matter what. That is not the point of the book or this thread. The point is to make sure that you don't level out of a tier before you've capped your RR.
Superior items won't exist, when you make LotD items unavailable for T3.Morf wrote:
There was alot of hate because twinks stayed in a tier and farmed lowbies with superior items, renown points and spec when they could progress to the next tier, idk why i have to explain the obvious.
When a player has better gear, more spec points and more renown points then kills a lower level player what other excuse is there if both players are as good as each other ?
I remember the young days of WAR as well, and they were fun but at the same time it was a pain to max ur RR. And it was easy to when u were a healer, so being R35/RR35 was miserable.Ototo wrote:Thats what i want back. Massive PvP assaults to keeps, epic defenses, world-ending battles of WB vs WB.
In the end i have to confess that i remember more and enjoyed more t2-3 than t1-4. As said, the gear gap, most likely. I have the feeling that most of u, with 1.4 and so, mostly grinded ur RR to t4. We didnt. We grinded our levels to be able to gain RR from PvP, and was fun.
Indeed i remember the good times like u described, when it was about the battle rather then caring about renown gain, hopefully we will see them times again hereOtoto wrote: This game is ALL about PvP.Spoiler:
aye, Devs should make LotD gear only available for lvl 40 and fix the danm LotD talisman bugSulorie wrote:Superior items won't exist, when you make LotD items unavailable for T3.Morf wrote:
There was alot of hate because twinks stayed in a tier and farmed lowbies with superior items, renown points and spec when they could progress to the next tier, idk why i have to explain the obvious.
When a player has better gear, more spec points and more renown points then kills a lower level player what other excuse is there if both players are as good as each other ?
![]()
Don't put words in my mouth. Just above my post that you quoted, you complain about players only caring about renown and avoiding fighting and leeching. Well guess what? If they didn't have to worry about leveling too quickly and min/maxing renown gain then they could freely participate in all the epic fights going on like "proper pvp'ers".Morf wrote:There was alot of hate because twinks stayed in a tier and farmed lowbies with superior items, renown points and spec when they could progress to the next tier, idk why i have to explain the obvious.Sulorie wrote: I don't know about what general hate towards twinks you are speaking. People stay in tiers to get the best possible renown rank before progressing to the next tier. Where is this twinking? You only farm renown to be ready for the next tier.
It's all about renown rank, because this gives you items.
The game is not about renown its about RvR you dont need renown to compete even tho ppl were obsessed with trying to get the most renown because they thought taking empty keeps and such would serve them better then actually pvp'ing and learning the game which is wrong and why you saw so many high level players that sucked.
When a player has better gear, more spec points and more renown points then kills a lower level player what other excuse is there if both players are as good as each other ?Sulorie wrote:Gear gap is such an easy excuse for losing in T2-3. -.-
Guess why T2 was empty. People rushed to T3, grind rats, because T3 locks gave more RP and being R32+, leeching T4 locks was possible as well. Doing this you increase your RR even faster.
I already said something about LotD, so complaining about that is a pretty weak argument.
T2 was empty because for most the game became solely a renown race towards the end year, where 90% of players from t1-t3 only cared about renown and avoided fighting because it was easier to leech, the type of players that helped ruin the great RvR we had.
Khorvald wrote: As I and others have already stated, T1 through T3 will eventually have population issues no matter what. That is not the point of the book or this thread. The point is to make sure that you don't level out of a tier before you've capped your RR.
Well i guess i misunderstood you, i thought you wanted no xp books to boost the pop in lower tiers, making the leveling experience more enjoyable but instead you want to help reintroduce the renown leech mode most proper pvp'ers hated.
No for renown whores, just go out and RvR !
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 6 guests