Suggestion : Slayer Changes
Forum rules
Before posting in this forum, please read the Terms of Use.
This section is for providing feedback and sharing your opinions on what could be improved or changed for the Return of Reckoning project.
To ensure your feedback is as helpful as possible, please review the Rules and Posting Guidelines before posting.
Before posting in this forum, please read the Terms of Use.
This section is for providing feedback and sharing your opinions on what could be improved or changed for the Return of Reckoning project.
To ensure your feedback is as helpful as possible, please review the Rules and Posting Guidelines before posting.
-
- Posts: 486
Re: Suggestion : Slayer Changes
just a little upgrade to the 2h specc would change the game to the better^^
Ads
Re: Suggestion : Slayer Changes
Hehehe... Good one.wargrimnir wrote: Mon Feb 15, 2021 1:57 pm Rampage should have a 2H requirement. Big weapons do strikethrough already.
Spoiler:
SW, Kotbs, IB, Slayer, WP, WL, SM, Mara, SH, BG
- Bowldancer
- Posts: 305
Re: Suggestion : Slayer Changes
We could base it on the true live event of "The Berserker at Stamford Bridge" who hold off an entire army all by himself with a 2H Dane axe.
Grimmsch Grimnirsson (2H Slayer, 40/86)
Several 80s
40+: 2H-CHOPPA, AM, RP, WP, SM, IB, KotBS, WL, WH, BW, ENG, SW
More on the way
Several 80s
40+: 2H-CHOPPA, AM, RP, WP, SM, IB, KotBS, WL, WH, BW, ENG, SW
More on the way
-
- Posts: 486
Re: Suggestion : Slayer Changes
yeah a 2h slayer holds to bridge against a gobo army, thatcinematic would secure us the buffBowldancer wrote: Mon Feb 15, 2021 2:15 pmWe could base it on the true live event of "The Berserker at Stamford Bridge" who hold off an entire army all by himself with a 2H Dane axe.
