RVR weekly event feedback

[messerjockel]

Background: main is destro and I am a smoker and because of smoking I am playing rarely in groups or WB because I don’t want to take a space away when smoking because I am afk. I would see myself as a casual gamer.

The weekly rvr task is great. I love it.
In the past before the weekly rvr event I had to join the weekend scenarios and got quite often farmed by premades or it took forever to complete all task and get the event items.
Since the weekly rvr task I don’t have to join scenarios anymore and that means I don’t get farmed which is great and I can spend much more hours in open rvr.

Thank you ROR team for rolling out the weekly rvr task.

BR

Messerjockel.

[Meliannia]

try being main is Order and a smoker for next week
then feedback.

[Lerris81]

praise the zerg

[Caerfinon]

“Bless the Zerg and the zerglings.
Bless the coming and going of Zerg.
May Zerg's passage cleanse the world.
May Zerg keep the world for Zerg's people. ”

[CountTalabecland]

The weekly rewards are nice.

But, probably need to be removed due to player behavior. The zerging is too much and 400% aao keep sieges are inexcusable. I know this is a player mentality issue but at some point devs need to step in.

I would say only bring back weekly rewards with a pop hard cap or make it so that if the enemy has 100% or more AAO you cannot make progress on weekly rewards bc you are just PvDooring for free crests.

[messerjockel]

Hello,

Maybe adjusting the 4 goals. To take 10 BO is not to difficult. Capture or defend a keep is more difficult, maybe make it 10 and change the requirement in participate in a keep Sieg. To kill 150 is also possible. In regards to the fort, change the requirement also to participation.

BR

Messerjockel

[Lion1986]

Order got 4 keeps in last 2 hours. Weekly event completed. Gg all

[kirraha]

Please take off the vote surrender in Event scs at least. Im so sick and tierd of ppl keep joining scs, voting to quit and mess up for ppl who wanna keep fighting or get their objectives, to then be on next scs. We had same ppl who keeps joining, voting for a surrender, then they are in next one. Please punish this behaviour. Imo, if it sucks so bad that you are dying or loosing, please stop play scs then instead of messing up for everybody else with your surrendering. Its your choice to quit the sc and take the quitter debuff. >:O

[Meliannia]

Please take off the vote surrender in Event scs at least. Im so sick and tierd of ppl keep joining scs, voting to quit and mess up for ppl who wanna keep fighting or get their objectives, to then be on next scs. We had same ppl who keeps joining, voting for a surrender, then they are in next one. Please punish this behaviour. Imo, if it sucks so bad that you are dying or loosing, please stop play scs then instead of messing up for everybody else with your surrendering. Its your choice to quit the sc and take the quitter debuff. >:O

]



none of what you say holds any water at all, its nonsense.
if the surrender vote was 1 vote needed only then yes you;d have a case but it doesnt , so you don;t
1. ppl who call a surrender 'dont mess' up anything, as it takes vast majority to agree to surrender, so 1 guy surrendering does not mess anything up UNLESS 9 or so others agree, then it's not 1 guy u need rant at its 9 people
2. most surrender votes are called not to 'stop you getting objectives' they are called because u CANNOT get your objectives coz its like 370-0 points, 37-0 kills, 5 bases vs 0, 14 ppl vs 9, 2 6man double premades vs 4 BWs, 1 WL, 2 engi and 3 WHs, u will get zero reknown zero points,
3. surrender vote does not 'mess it up for every1 else' as ppl can just click NO, or even just dont click anything and let it time down unacted upon
4. I would actually take the opposite stance than yourself if a scenario is 370-0 37kills to 0, 14ppl vs 9ppl, then why should you vote no or let the timer tick down and keep 6 sensible in a write off car crash scen for 4 or 5more mins to get zero points zero reknown and be farmed 25 more times?
5. most ppl only surrender if the scenario is an unwinnable massacre, that's why there is a surrender option
6. only time i seen anyone ever try to surrender and throw a winning scen was a certain Order guild trying to surrender Doomfist Crater once and talabac dam once when we were 410 -240 up to let their xrealm destro mate buddies get a free win, but luckily 7 of us voted them down.

Surrender is a pretty rare thing but it's there for a reason, and it takes majority of the team to make it happen

[Omegus]

Please take off the vote surrender in Event scs at least. Im so sick and tierd of ppl keep joining scs, voting to quit and mess up for ppl who wanna keep fighting or get their objectives, to then be on next scs. We had same ppl who keeps joining, voting for a surrender, then they are in next one. Please punish this behaviour. Imo, if it sucks so bad that you are dying or loosing, please stop play scs then instead of messing up for everybody else with your surrendering. Its your choice to quit the sc and take the quitter debuff. >:O

]



none of what you say holds any water at all, its nonsense.
if the surrender vote was 1 vote needed only then yes you;d have a case but it doesnt , so you don;t
1. ppl who call a surrender 'dont mess' up anything, as it takes vast majority to agree to surrender, so 1 guy surrendering does not mess anything up UNLESS 9 or so others agree, then it's not 1 guy u need rant at its 9 people
2. most surrender votes are called not to 'stop you getting objectives' they are called because u CANNOT get your objectives coz its like 370-0 points, 37-0 kills, 5 bases vs 0, 14 ppl vs 9, 2 6man double premades vs 4 BWs, 1 WL, 2 engi and 3 WHs, u will get zero reknown zero points,
3. surrender vote does not 'mess it up for every1 else' as ppl can just click NO, or even just dont click anything and let it time down unacted upon
4. I would actually take the opposite stance than yourself if a scenario is 370-0 37kills to 0, 14ppl vs 9ppl, then why should you vote no or let the timer tick down and keep 6 sensible in a write off car crash scen for 4 or 5more mins to get zero points zero reknown and be farmed 25 more times?
5. most ppl only surrender if the scenario is an unwinnable massacre, that's why there is a surrender option
6. only time i seen anyone ever try to surrender and throw a winning scen was a certain Order guild trying to surrender Doomfist Crater once and talabac dam once when we were 410 -240 up to let their xrealm destro mate buddies get a free win, but luckily 7 of us voted them down.

Surrender is a pretty rare thing but it's there for a reason, and it takes majority of the team to make it happen

Surrender messes up the enemy side too trying to do the event. Take Battle for Praag in which the live event has tasks for capturing objectives, and those objectives are captured in order so the north and south ones are captured last. Early surrenders from a losing team prevent the winning team from completing those tasks. This is the kind of impact which causes people to object having the surrender option in the event scenarios.

Also, in the past few hours order just won city, took Caledor and took Fell Landing. Hope you didn't miss out