City siege event week

[Kpi]

Hi!!!

There are a lot of Week events:
-SC event
-RVR Event
-PVE event
-Ranked event

Why not add an City siege event too?

Rewards similar to RVR event:
-Basic: Potion of acclaim; 10 gold or 25 Warcrest
-Advanced: 50 Warcrest; Event item
-Elite: Stalwart soulstone; 50 gold; 75 Warcrest; or Triumphant insignia

Goals:
-Participate on 2 citys
-Win 1 city
-Kill 100 players on city siege.

This will motivate to people to play city. Only playing a full city can obtain the first reward, and winning 1 city per week.

I think can be a good idea. What do you think?

[paperclipdog]

Hi!!!

There are a lot of Week events:
-SC event
-RVR Event
-PVE event
-Ranked event

Why not add an City siege event too?

Rewards similar to RVR event:
-Basic: Potion of acclaim; 10 gold or 25 Warcrest
-Advanced: 50 Warcrest; Event item
-Elite: Stalwart soulstone; 50 gold; 75 Warcrest; or Triumphant insignia

Goals:
-Participate on 2 citys
-Win 1 city
-Kill 100 players on city siege.

This will motivate to people to play city. Only playing a full city can obtain the first reward, and winning 1 city per week.

I think can be a good idea. What do you think?

More rewards = more people doing city... kinda obvious bandaid fix for a gamemode many don't enjoy (1 hour+ fun-roulette and you will apparently be banned if you choose not to feed). There is no need to tie the rewards to another weekly event. Too many weekly events will start to feel like chores. I quit playing a bunch of MMOs because of the chores.

Additionall, none of the other events are tied to specific times you have to attend. Don't make city even more of a thorn in the schedule by tying insanely good rewards to a weekly that needs you to make time for minimum 2 specific timeslots/week. Timeslots that are changing weekly. Chances are the weekly will be impossible to complete for most people with a life outside of this game.

[Acidic]

The game does not need more events.
Already the rvr content which is traditionally the core of the game is totally destroyed by the existing events.

The game desperately need some balance between factions as well as something to address the population imbalance especially in NA times.

[rejndjer]

the game needs more players.

when you have low amount players like ror does for last half a year then every player will count and could ruin balance in NA times, and even in eu primetimes if one good wb switches, "balance" gets disturbed and everyone starts crying. first we need to get back at least 1k players during low-times, and 3-4k players during prime times. then you can start taking about "faction balance".

concerning proposed city weekly change, i couldnt care less. it won't make me want to play cities more since it's boringfest 99% of time, you either stomp or get stomped. big scenario.

[BluIzLucky]

Yeah, not big on another weekly, though at this point I just do the Weekend SC and with some luck the RvR.

Think it would be better just to add the influence from City to RvR Weekly.

As for Insignias they could be in bags/stages for winners for premade vs premade, this would be better than making it available through weekly pug city wins.

City's main problem right now is just there's very little comeback or outplay mechanics when fights are stalemates or onesided.

[Absinth]

Goals:
-Participate on 2 citys
-Win 1 city
-Kill 100 players on city siege.

This will motivate to people to play city. Only playing a full city can obtain the first reward, and winning 1 city per week.

I think can be a good idea. What do you think?

Ahh yes lets go to the requirements that will cause 100% of people unable to get second and third reward! Such a way to go.
What city needs is a good carrot and a small redesign.

[evildeadbird]

That'll motivate people.
Just like Ranked Event does.
Wait.