RVR population balance suggestion

[kam080]

e.g. 100% aao, less population side got 100% dmg/heal/protection increase.
more population side got 100% dmg/heal/protection decrease.

lets us discuss this suggestion~~~~~

or less population side add more CPU players

e.g. lord will be scout in rvr lake~

[CyunUnderis]

e.g. 100% aao, less population side got 100% dmg/heal/protection increase.
more population side got 100% dmg/heal/protection decrease.

lets us discuss this suggestion~~~~~

I guess you don't understand what this percentage means for the calculation of heal or damage, otherwise you will not suggest it.

Also, in the past, something a bit equivalent has been tested where AAO give damage boost and it was revert back for a normal reason.

[kam080]

e.g. 100% aao, less population side got 100% dmg/heal/protection increase.
more population side got 100% dmg/heal/protection decrease.

lets us discuss this suggestion~~~~~

I guess you don't understand what this percentage means for the calculation of heal or damage, otherwise you will not suggest it.

Also, in the past, something a bit equivalent has been tested where AAO give damage boost and it was revert back for a normal reason.

just the staus of a character increase or decrease by the amount of aao%

this got the less population side can play be god-like and attract more to shift to less population side

[CountTalabecland]

e.g. 100% aao, less population side got 100% dmg/heal/protection increase.
more population side got 100% dmg/heal/protection decrease.

lets us discuss this suggestion~~~~~

or less population side add more CPU players

e.g. lord will be scout in rvr lake~

This same foolish thing has been suggested a million times.

No, it would be terrible. You are on overpopulated side and the second you are locally outnumbered you are supposed to fight a enemy with those stats? It would do nothing but mandate the overpopulated side to zerg constantly to avoid being outnumbered and picked off.

TLDR you suggestion would promote zerging and toxic ganking.

There is no fix other than hard population caps, but that has never been done and has never even been entertained by devs.

[diedrake]

the Devs have stated time and time again, RvR is not meant to be equal numbers. Also, some of us love going aao hunting. War never changes... and apparently Forums never do either...

[Bosli]

There is no fix other than hard population caps, but that has never been done and has never even been entertained by devs.

Not quite correct. We have had some testing of population locked zones (mainly due to server issues and not balance reasons) and it was terrible, as organized groups/warbands couldn't get all their players in the same zone as spots were blocked by solo players.

[tvbrowntown]

game dying a slow death so just enjoy what you can

[kam080]

game dying a slow death so just enjoy what you can

we can do more, war is a good game.

[kam080]

population caps + soft stat increase of less aao side maybe good~

[kam080]

e.g. 100% aao, less population side got 100% dmg/heal/protection increase.
more population side got 100% dmg/heal/protection decrease.

lets us discuss this suggestion~~~~~

or less population side add more CPU players

e.g. lord will be scout in rvr lake~

This same foolish thing has been suggested a million times.

No, it would be terrible. You are on overpopulated side and the second you are locally outnumbered you are supposed to fight a enemy with those stats? It would do nothing but mandate the overpopulated side to zerg constantly to avoid being outnumbered and picked off.

TLDR you suggestion would promote zerging and toxic ganking.

There is no fix other than hard population caps, but that has never been done and has never even been entertained by devs.

overpopulated side fight with a improved force, let less populated side play more fun and attract more to switch to less side.

and overpopulated have more fun with fighting a more powerful force also have fun.