Recent Topics

Ads

xRealm

Share your ideas and feedback to help improve the game.
Forum rules
Before posting in this forum, please read the Terms of Use.

This section is for providing feedback and sharing your opinions on what could be improved or changed for the Return of Reckoning project.

To ensure your feedback is as helpful as possible, please review the Rules and Posting Guidelines before posting.
Panel
Posts: 158

Re: xRealm

Post#11 » Sun Sep 01, 2024 1:28 pm

Get the x-realmers where it hurts- a good swift kick in the crests :)

Ads
User avatar
Nameless
Posts: 1419

Re: xRealm

Post#12 » Sun Sep 01, 2024 2:38 pm

skorvag wrote: Sun Sep 01, 2024 11:08 am
Nameless wrote: Sat Aug 31, 2024 7:49 pm Just add debuff when switch fractions no renown and crests gain for a hour.
So if switch to help pve you could do it without any problem. If you wanna do some pvp you could do it but 1 hour no rp or crests gain
This is the worst approach. Punish those that want to do positive xRealming isnt helpfull. You want to punish those that are doing negative xRealm/exploit.
If, as many said, xrealm for the good of the game they will do it. They will got good fights, they will do orvr stuff, just not rp and renown. But since xrealmers doest care about these things but only for the good fight there is no back draws, right?
Alternatively if the fractuon you switch gain aao you may gain rp and crests only at orvr till there is aao. At scen no for 1 hours
Mostly harmless

K8P & Norn - guild Orz

Garamore
Posts: 442

Re: xRealm

Post#13 » Sun Sep 01, 2024 6:24 pm

There is good xrealming and bad xrealming. Good is swapping to balance the fights. Bad is doing it to join the winning side or pushing for a fort and then xrealming over.

I would just simply make it so you have to have a certain level of contribution to get into a fort. People qq and say this would lead to undefended forts but I think it would encourage people into the RvR lakes thus stopping the I will afk till get a super defensible position people from doing that and wiping out half the toxic xrealming part. If people care enough about losing a fort they can just join the defense of the last zone. If they just want to wait till fort pops for an easy farm they cant.

Its pretty rare these days that a fort is full or if you know what you are doing you dont get in. Therefore any qq about it already being there is kinda pointless outside of about 1 hr of primetime these days.
Garamore - Chosen Garamar - Marauder Garachop - Choppa Garamor - Slayer

Warband leader for Hand of Blood

https://www.twitch.tv/therealgaramore

User avatar
zulnam
Posts: 806

Re: xRealm

Post#14 » Sun Sep 01, 2024 11:31 pm

Garamore wrote: Sun Sep 01, 2024 6:24 pm There is good xrealming and bad xrealming. Good is swapping to balance the fights. Bad is doing it to join the winning side or pushing for a fort and then xrealming over.
Also once witnessed an account of grey xrealming. When a guild lead a warband through an entire campaign to lock the enemy city, only to then change realms and participate in a city on the other side.

And it was not a pushover campaign, both sides had at least 2 oWBs in the field. The last fort fight was close.

But yeah xrealming is not inherently bad. It's similar to the guns debate. The moral factor comes down to how you use it: to Stand Up or to Punch Down.
SW, Kotbs, IB, Slayer, WP, WL, SM, Mara, SH, BG

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests