Useless? No. Is there ANY stat that you would switch for WS as SM? No. Which means that WS is "better than nothing". No more, no less.nocturnalguest wrote: Wed Aug 20, 2025 1:19 pm Reading all this feels like im on a gathering of somekinda Cult... Really folks, who has proved that WS is a useless stat for SM? Who was that person? What data backs it up? How do you even type such stuff while its plain simple to just check reality on killboard?
Here is a quick guide:
- pick any proper SM who plays in group
- click on "Details" button in "Kills" section
- look up contribution into kill
- rinse and repeat
Look, an example https://killboard.returnofreckoning.com/kill/52553581
Look different kills and phys skills+AA contribution for kill damage.
Alternate LV set for tanks that don't use weapon skill
Forum rules
Before posting in this forum, please read the Terms of Use.
This section is for providing feedback and sharing your opinions on what could be improved or changed for the Return of Reckoning project.
To ensure your feedback is as helpful as possible, please review the Rules and Posting Guidelines before posting.
Before posting in this forum, please read the Terms of Use.
This section is for providing feedback and sharing your opinions on what could be improved or changed for the Return of Reckoning project.
To ensure your feedback is as helpful as possible, please review the Rules and Posting Guidelines before posting.
Re: Alternate LV set for tanks that don't use weapon skill
Ads
-
- Posts: 670
Re: Alternate LV set for tanks that don't use weapon skill
You are absolutely correct.Avernus wrote: Wed Aug 20, 2025 2:44 pm Useless? No. Is there ANY stat that you would switch for WS as SM? No. Which means that WS is "better than nothing". No more, no less.
This tho leads to a following - why SM should benefit better then other tanks? inb4 tanks has had different stuff, different weapons etc but that logic is on purpose no longer applied and everything is unified. Why should sets be alternate for SM? SM uses WS, title is incorrect. If so why sets shouldnt be alternated for rest of tanks who all has something special.
Im just saying that this topic is as "useless" as screaming in a desert. Nothing to actually discuss here /shrug
-
- Posts: 336
Re: Alternate LV set for tanks that don't use weapon skill
Let's all be honest, the removal of Parry to Wep Skill should be reconsidered. Just 1/2 the bonus it previously provided to Parry or come up with a formula for any stat that provides both Offensive and Defensive benefits.
————————————————
Destro realm pride parade
Destro realm pride parade
-
- Posts: 670
Re: Alternate LV set for tanks that don't use weapon skill
Agree. At least for 2h tanks. Maybe some other tweaks required for MDPS, but 2h tanks suffer after this one for nothing. MDPS WS-parry issue is debatable, but still it would be much easier to just revert and adjust something else RoR team may consider wrongIlluminati wrote: Wed Aug 20, 2025 3:10 pm Let's all be honest, the removal of Parry to Wep Skill should be reconsidered. Just 1/2 the bonus it previously provided to Parry or come up with a formula for any stat that provides both Offensive and Defensive benefits.
Re: Alternate LV set for tanks that don't use weapon skill
I have the other question - why bother to create armor with set bonuses like that? I mean, you might as well do nothing at all, i understand that conq and the rest of those garbage tier sets are old and outdated, but to add more junk into this pile...why?nocturnalguest wrote: Wed Aug 20, 2025 2:56 pm Why should sets be alternate for SM? SM uses WS, title is incorrect. If so why sets shouldnt be alternated for rest of tanks who all has something special.
Im just saying that this topic is as "useless" as screaming in a desert. Nothing to actually discuss here /shrug
-
- Posts: 670
Re: Alternate LV set for tanks that don't use weapon skill
You are very close to summon Sinisterror once again in this thread!Avernus wrote: Wed Aug 20, 2025 3:18 pm I have the other question - why bother to create armor with set bonuses like that? I mean, you might as well do nothing at all, i understand that conq and the rest of those garbage tier sets are old and outdated, but to add more junk into this pile...why?

On a serious note, good question indeed, but when its more logical and productive (imo!) to raise questions against unified copycat sets and tanks itemization rather then create useless topics with nothing interesting to discuss.
Re: Alternate LV set for tanks that don't use weapon skill
This discussion is thankfully behind us.Illuminati wrote: Wed Aug 20, 2025 3:10 pm Let's all be honest, the removal of Parry to Wep Skill should be reconsidered. Just 1/2 the bonus it previously provided to Parry or come up with a formula for any stat that provides both Offensive and Defensive benefits.
Ini/ws change was one of the most logical changes on this server.
It was absolute stupidity that one stat gave offensive bonuses and defensive bonuses.
The change is logical and good. Learn to live with it.
I don't know what the problem is?
If you want to have parry you choose initiative. Unless you want to hit hard like mdps and be tough like tank?
Fortunately, reason is starting to prevail on this server.
As for chosen/sm. Enough they have an advantage over others that one ws bonus will cancel out that advantage.
Hurub Chopa 80+ / Wybrany Chosen 80+ / Mroczniak BG 60+ / Alubercik BO 50+ / Doczek DoK 80+ / Hurubek Zeal 80+ /
Misio Shaman 80+ / Maxra Mara 60+ / Alubertus RP 70+ / Alubert KTB 80+ / Mnich WP 60+ / Kregi SL 60+ / Uposledzonyjez IB 40+
Misio Shaman 80+ / Maxra Mara 60+ / Alubertus RP 70+ / Alubert KTB 80+ / Mnich WP 60+ / Kregi SL 60+ / Uposledzonyjez IB 40+
Re: Alternate LV set for tanks that don't use weapon skill
so true agree 100% SM need alternative gear compare to other tanks with spirit resist debuffMalessar wrote: Mon Aug 18, 2025 5:55 pm Chosen and swordmaster aren't inherently op as to justify them being punished over other classes, being given a set that is subpar what it would be to a black orc or a kotbs. It serves no purpose or reason.
Please make an alternative that simply replaces the ws for spirit damage. They get subpar items for the same amount of effort and it doesn't have any reason, it just is.
Ads
Re: Alternate LV set for tanks that don't use weapon skill
What? Are people THAT bad that they consider using WoH beneath them? Unless they'll be stacking...but if they will - why delete Heaven's Blade in the first place?hordak774 wrote: Wed Aug 20, 2025 4:21 pmso true agree 100% SM need alternative gear compare to other tanks with spirit resist debuffMalessar wrote: Mon Aug 18, 2025 5:55 pm Chosen and swordmaster aren't inherently op as to justify them being punished over other classes, being given a set that is subpar what it would be to a black orc or a kotbs. It serves no purpose or reason.
Please make an alternative that simply replaces the ws for spirit damage. They get subpar items for the same amount of effort and it doesn't have any reason, it just is.
Re: Alternate LV set for tanks that don't use weapon skill
Correct me if I'm wrong but doesn't SM have aoe spirit resist debuff?hordak774 wrote: Wed Aug 20, 2025 4:21 pmso true agree 100% SM need alternative gear compare to other tanks with spirit resist debuffMalessar wrote: Mon Aug 18, 2025 5:55 pm Chosen and swordmaster aren't inherently op as to justify them being punished over other classes, being given a set that is subpar what it would be to a black orc or a kotbs. It serves no purpose or reason.
Please make an alternative that simply replaces the ws for spirit damage. They get subpar items for the same amount of effort and it doesn't have any reason, it just is.
Hurub Chopa 80+ / Wybrany Chosen 80+ / Mroczniak BG 60+ / Alubercik BO 50+ / Doczek DoK 80+ / Hurubek Zeal 80+ /
Misio Shaman 80+ / Maxra Mara 60+ / Alubertus RP 70+ / Alubert KTB 80+ / Mnich WP 60+ / Kregi SL 60+ / Uposledzonyjez IB 40+
Misio Shaman 80+ / Maxra Mara 60+ / Alubertus RP 70+ / Alubert KTB 80+ / Mnich WP 60+ / Kregi SL 60+ / Uposledzonyjez IB 40+
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], wonshot and 2 guests