Shield Warrior Priest underperformance even with BiS gear
Forum rules
Before posting in this forum, please read the Terms of Use.
This section is for providing feedback and sharing your opinions on what could be improved or changed for the Return of Reckoning project.
To ensure your feedback is as helpful as possible, please review the Rules and Posting Guidelines before posting.
Before posting in this forum, please read the Terms of Use.
This section is for providing feedback and sharing your opinions on what could be improved or changed for the Return of Reckoning project.
To ensure your feedback is as helpful as possible, please review the Rules and Posting Guidelines before posting.
Re: Shield Warrior Priest underperformance even with BiS gear
The only thing that would make shield spec good in warbands is Sigmar's Will, as far as I'm concerned, which maybe can result in good numbers, sure, not much beyond these
Ads
Re: Shield Warrior Priest underperformance even with BiS gear
I have a crazy idea that would reinforce the melee support identity instead of just buffing numbers.
Make every Shield WP melee ability affect up to 2 targets in AOE (cone)
The important part is this:
* If the attack successfully hits an enemy, the ability works exactly as it does now, with its full healing/lifetap potential calculated over the strongest hit / higher damage.
* If no enemy is hit (out of range, no target selected, target defended, etc.), the skill still activates, but with a reduced “support” version of its effect.
Examples:
* Sigmar’s Fist could still provide its Strength buff to nearby allies.
* Benediction could still apply a weaker absorb.
* Other support abilities could still trigger their utility at reduced effectiveness.
This would solve one of the biggest frustrations of Shield WP: becoming almost useless whenever there is nothing to hit. You would still be rewarded for fighting in melee, because landing attacks gives the full healing value, but you wouldn’t lose your entire toolkit just because you temporarily have no target.
It also creates interesting gameplay. The best Shield WP is still the one actively hitting enemies, but the class always contributes something during pushes, retreats, target swaps or when enemies are kiting.
The identity remains “melee healer”, but the gameplay becomes much smoother and less binary...same can be applied to dok.
Make every Shield WP melee ability affect up to 2 targets in AOE (cone)
The important part is this:
* If the attack successfully hits an enemy, the ability works exactly as it does now, with its full healing/lifetap potential calculated over the strongest hit / higher damage.
* If no enemy is hit (out of range, no target selected, target defended, etc.), the skill still activates, but with a reduced “support” version of its effect.
Examples:
* Sigmar’s Fist could still provide its Strength buff to nearby allies.
* Benediction could still apply a weaker absorb.
* Other support abilities could still trigger their utility at reduced effectiveness.
This would solve one of the biggest frustrations of Shield WP: becoming almost useless whenever there is nothing to hit. You would still be rewarded for fighting in melee, because landing attacks gives the full healing value, but you wouldn’t lose your entire toolkit just because you temporarily have no target.
It also creates interesting gameplay. The best Shield WP is still the one actively hitting enemies, but the class always contributes something during pushes, retreats, target swaps or when enemies are kiting.
The identity remains “melee healer”, but the gameplay becomes much smoother and less binary...same can be applied to dok.
Re: Shield Warrior Priest underperformance even with BiS gear
Hyped for next grace wp buff 
Re: Shield Warrior Priest underperformance even with BiS gear
The result from the last week. I was not able to post it before 
Weekly Shield WP
Sample
Filters used
Comparison rules
One SC is excluded from the relative healer comparison because Sxxxxxx was the only Order healer in that scenario.
Global result
All tables below use only comparable entries.
By player
By day
By RR bracket
By scenario size
Small brackets should be read carefully.
By number of Order healers
Short reading
The final comparable sample is smaller, but cleaner:
The global result is:
Weekly Shield WP
Sample
Code: Select all
Period: 10/07 to 13/07
Global dataset:
Scenarios downloaded: 2,039
Scoreboard entries: 48,512
Sigmar's Will detections: 333
Scenarios with Shield WP: 144
Level 40 detected Shield WP entries: 53
Level 40 detected Shield WP players: 10
Strict same-scenario Sigmar's Will entries:
Entries: 22
Players: 7
After healing > damage filter:
Entries: 21
Players: 7
Comparable entries vs Order healers:
Entries: 20
Players: 7
Scenarios: 20
Code: Select all
Shield WP healer entry:
* Level 40
* Warrior Priest
* Sigmar's Will damage confirmed inside the same scenario
* Healing > damage
Code: Select all
Order healer comparison:
* Only Order healers
* WP, AM, RP
* Shield WP entries excluded from the Order healer average
* Entries with no other Order healer are excluded from relative healer comparisons
DPS comparison:
* Level 40 active DPS in the same scenarios
Code: Select all
Heal% = Shield WP Heal/min vs other Order healers
HealO% = Shield WP Heal others/min vs other Order healers
ProtO% = Shield WP protection to others vs other Order healers
ProtRecv% = Shield WP protection received vs other Order healers
Deaths% = Shield WP deaths vs other Order healers
Dmg% = Shield WP damage vs average active DPS
KillDmg% = Shield WP kill damage vs average active DPS kill damage
Global result
All tables below use only comparable entries.
Code: Select all
SC WP RR Win% Heal/min Heal% HealO/min HealO%
20 7 71.5 35.0% 11.10k 52.3% 8.77k 46.3%
Code: Select all
Dmg Dmg% KillDmg KillDmg% Kill% Dmg/Heal
28.57k 34.6% 8.74k 39.2% 30.6% 35.4%
Code: Select all
ProtO/min ProtO% ProtRecv/min ProtRecv% Deaths Deaths% Res SelfProt
1.65k 47.0% 3.99k 241.6% 1.4 210.7% 0.5 64.0%
Code: Select all
Player SC RR Win% Heal/min Heal% HealO/min HealO%
Axxxxx 7 84.0 28.6% 16.01k 62.1% 12.57k 54.1%
Dxxxxx 3 71.0 0.0% 8.29k 33.1% 7.44k 33.2%
Gxxxxxx 3 49.7 66.7% 4.57k 19.1% 2.32k 10.9%
Sxxxxxx 3 77.7 66.7% 18.59k 157.8% 15.23k 150.3%
Lxxxxxx 2 81.0 50.0% 2.97k 18.3% 2.05k 14.5%
Bxxxxx 1 44.0 0.0% 8.79k 65.2% 7.80k 59.7%
Zxxxxx 1 41.0 0.0% 0.84k 5.2% 0.53k 3.9%
Code: Select all
Player Dmg Dmg% KillDmg KillDmg% ProtO% ProtRecv%
Axxxxx 33.71k 41.3% 10.82k 45.4% 53.1% 483.3%
Dxxxxx 34.81k 26.4% 13.32k 45.5% 40.4% 71.1%
Gxxxxxx 18.16k 22.8% 5.02k 19.1% 31.6% 165.3%
Sxxxxxx 44.97k 71.1% 10.39k 81.7% 39.1% 613.3%
Lxxxxxx 16.72k 23.0% 4.68k 27.4% 50.2% 145.2%
Bxxxxx 5.68k 13.4% 3.13k 30.9% - 320.4%
Zxxxxx 2.50k 3.7% 0.42k 1.4% 0.0% 0.0%
Code: Select all
Player Deaths Deaths% Res
Axxxxx 1.1 112.7% 0.3
Dxxxxx 1.3 571.4% 1.3
Gxxxxxx 2.0 189.5% 0.3
Sxxxxxx 1.0 500.0% 0.3
Lxxxxxx 2.5 666.7% 0.0
Bxxxxx 0.0 - 2.0
Zxxxxx 1.0 200.0% 0.0
Code: Select all
Day SC WP RR Win% Heal/min Heal% HealO%
10/07 3 2 73.0 33.3% 12.96k 65.2% 65.0%
11/07 12 4 79.6 33.3% 12.65k 59.4% 51.1%
12/07 3 2 57.0 66.7% 7.23k 27.1% 23.0%
13/07 2 2 42.5 0.0% 4.81k 32.6% 31.5%
Code: Select all
Day Dmg% KillDmg% ProtO% ProtRecv% Deaths Deaths%
10/07 33.5% 61.3% 36.1% 75.7% 0.7 375.0%
11/07 40.4% 39.7% 46.9% 432.6% 1.4 189.9%
12/07 28.2% 35.6% 60.3% 202.5% 2.3 247.1%
13/07 7.4% 8.9% 58.3% 142.8% 0.5 200.0%
Code: Select all
RR SC WP Win% Heal/min Heal% HealO%
40-49 3 3 0.0% 4.49k 27.4% 22.3%
50-59 2 1 100.0% 4.93k 18.9% 12.1%
70-79 6 2 33.3% 13.44k 73.0% 69.6%
80-89 9 2 33.3% 13.11k 55.5% 48.3%
Code: Select all
RR Dmg% KillDmg% ProtO% ProtRecv% Deaths Deaths%
40-49 13.3% 11.6% 33.5% 89.6% 0.7 200.0%
50-59 23.6% 21.0% 51.3% 362.8% 2.5 187.5%
70-79 40.9% 56.5% 40.1% 182.3% 1.2 538.5%
80-89 37.6% 42.3% 52.7% 425.9% 1.4 165.6%
Small brackets should be read carefully.
Code: Select all
Players SC WP Heal/min Heal% HealO%
12-17 1 1 8.79k 65.2% 59.7%
18-23 1 1 0.84k 5.2% 3.9%
24 1 1 25.82k 208.7% 238.3%
25-35 4 4 8.05k 50.2% 38.1%
36+ 13 5 11.87k 48.4% 42.9%
Code: Select all
Players Dmg% KillDmg% ProtO% ProtRecv% Deaths%
12-17 13.4% 30.9% - 320.4% -
18-23 3.7% 1.4% 0.0% 0.0% 200.0%
24 76.3% 343.6% 121.4% 150.5% -
25-35 36.9% 19.0% 37.8% 490.6% 154.6%
36+ 34.5% 44.1% 47.6% 199.6% 231.2%
Code: Select all
Order healers SC WP Heal/min Heal% HealO%
<=3 4 4 10.27k 63.8% 60.9%
4-5 11 4 9.94k 44.6% 36.1%
6+ 5 3 14.31k 62.0% 59.9%
Code: Select all
Order healers Dmg% KillDmg% ProtO% ProtRecv% Deaths%
<=3 32.2% 42.1% 68.4% 139.8% 150.0%
4-5 33.3% 37.2% 48.6% 269.5% 194.6%
6+ 37.0% 41.7% 39.5% 247.5% 383.0%
The final comparable sample is smaller, but cleaner:
Code: Select all
Comparable Shield WP healer entries: 20
Players: 7
Scenarios: 20
Code: Select all
Heal/min vs other Order healers: 52.3%
Heal others/min vs other Order healers: 46.3%
Damage vs average active DPS: 34.6%
Kill damage vs average active DPS: 39.2%
Protection to others vs Order healers: 47.0%
Protection received vs Order healers: 241.6%
Deaths vs Order healers: 210.7%
Founder member & Ex-2OiC Tercio de Estalia (2019-23)
Que buen vasallo si tuviera buen señor
Proud Soldier "LOS AUTONOMOS" (Since 2025)
El Campeador estaba alegre, igual que todos los suyos, cuando su estandarte ondeó en lo alto del alcázar
Que buen vasallo si tuviera buen señor
Proud Soldier "LOS AUTONOMOS" (Since 2025)
El Campeador estaba alegre, igual que todos los suyos, cuando su estandarte ondeó en lo alto del alcázar
Re: Shield Warrior Priest underperformance even with BiS gear
Weekly Shield WP report
Filters used
Comparison rules
Percent columns use aggregate mean-to-mean comparison inside each group. This avoids one scenario where the comparison healer has near-zero output distorting the whole table.
Global result
All tables below use only comparable entries.
By player
When anonymized labels collide, I add -1 / -2.
By RR bracket
By scenario size
Small brackets should be read carefully.
By number of Order healers
Code: Select all
Period: 17/07 to 19/07
Global dataset:
Scenarios downloaded: 2,180
Scoreboard entries: 42,753
Sigmar's Will detections: 676
Scenarios with Shield WP: 226
Level 40 period-detected Shield WP entries:
Entries: 197
Players: 15
Strict same-scenario Sigmar's Will entries:
Entries: 96
Players: 13
After false-positive filters:
Entries: 94
Players: 13
Comparable entries vs Order healers:
Entries: 91
Players: 13
Scenarios: 87
Code: Select all
Shield WP healer/support entry:
* Level 40
* Warrior Priest
* Sigmar's Will damage confirmed inside the same scenario
* Healing > damage
* Damage >= 10% of healing
* Damage >= 10% of average active DPS damage in the same scenario
Code: Select all
Order healer comparison:
* Only Order healers
* WP, AM, RP
* Shield WP entries excluded from the Order healer average
* Entries with no other Order healer are excluded from relative healer comparisons
DPS comparison:
* Level 40 active DPS in the same scenarios
Percent columns:
Heal% = Shield WP Heal/min vs other Order healers
HealO% = Shield WP Heal others/min vs other Order healers
ProtO% = Shield WP protection to others vs other Order healers
ProtRecv% = Shield WP protection received vs other Order healers
Deaths% = Shield WP deaths vs other Order healers
Dmg% = Shield WP damage vs average active DPS
KillDmg% = Shield WP kill damage vs average active DPS kill damage
Global result
All tables below use only comparable entries.
Code: Select all
SC WP RR Win% Heal/min Heal% HealO/min HealO%
91 13 79.4 38.5% 16.79k 105.8% 12.51k 94.1%
Code: Select all
Dmg Dmg% KillDmg KillDmg% Kill% Dmg/Heal
34.29k 40.1% 10.40k 36.8% 30.3% 26.6%
Code: Select all
ProtO/min ProtO% ProtRecv/min ProtRecv% Deaths Deaths% Res SelfProt
1.31k 46.4% 5.26k 234.9% 1.2 120.4% 0.3 69.0%
When anonymized labels collide, I add -1 / -2.
Code: Select all
Player SC RR Win% Heal/min Heal% HealO/min HealO%
Sxxxxxx 28 79.1 50.0% 22.64k 118.1% 17.66k 109.2%
Rxxxxx 15 90.0 6.7% 18.57k 185.1% 14.29k 169.6%
Sxxxxxxxx-2 13 83.0 30.8% 13.07k 76.9% 9.41k 65.0%
Cxxxxxxx 9 71.7 22.2% 17.33k 105.7% 12.81k 93.0%
Rxxxxxxx 6 60.0 50.0% 9.47k 58.0% 6.56k 48.1%
Kxxxxx 5 85.0 80.0% 16.35k 92.0% 9.30k 64.7%
Axxxxx 4 84.5 50.0% 16.50k 131.4% 11.47k 117.5%
Dxxxxx 4 71.0 50.0% 2.94k 20.5% 1.76k 14.5%
Uxxxx-2 3 82.0 66.7% 8.79k 66.2% 7.17k 65.9%
Gxxxxxxx 1 61.0 0.0% 8.06k 67.1% 6.12k 55.9%
Sxxxxxxxx-1 1 75.0 100.0% 16.87k 86.0% 11.58k 74.5%
Uxxxx-1 1 82.0 0.0% 11.91k 85.0% 7.10k 58.4%
Wxxxxxxxxx 1 66.0 0.0% 10.13k 124.8% 7.04k 112.4%
Code: Select all
Player Dmg Dmg% KillDmg KillDmg% ProtO% ProtRecv% Deaths Deaths% Res
Sxxxxxx 41.35k 43.3% 12.00k 39.1% 20.4% 288.2% 1.2 122.4% 0.3
Rxxxxx 35.94k 49.9% 11.90k 52.3% 97.7% 191.5% 0.5 70.5% 0.6
Sxxxxxxxx-2 32.88k 41.2% 13.49k 47.0% 131.7% 225.3% 0.6 76.8% 0.3
Cxxxxxxx 29.84k 30.0% 8.35k 30.5% 18.4% 304.4% 1.9 304.5% 0.0
Rxxxxxxx 15.15k 25.3% 6.10k 22.6% 2.1% 356.8% 1.5 124.1% 0.2
Kxxxxx 28.63k 29.7% 3.98k 14.5% 34.0% 482.0% 1.8 100.0% 0.2
Axxxxx 45.02k 48.3% 12.39k 34.5% 50.8% 118.4% 2.2 135.0% 0.2
Dxxxxx 16.67k 26.3% 4.69k 16.6% 42.6% 35.9% 2.2 122.7% 0.5
Uxxxx-2 17.63k 28.7% 7.09k 22.1% 218.1% 59.6% 1.0 138.5% 0.3
Gxxxxxxx 8.88k 14.2% 5.72k 19.6% 124.6% 95.6% 1.0 100.0% 0.0
Sxxxxxxxx-1 130.79k 76.1% 7.19k 39.7% 94.1% 138.2% 0.0 0.0% 0.0
Uxxxx-1 34.86k 24.8% 12.52k 45.1% 28.5% 155.1% 0.0 - 0.0
Wxxxxxxxxx 19.31k 31.9% 9.61k 40.8% 110.3% 57.9% 0.0 - 0.0
Code: Select all
RR SC WP Win% Heal/min Heal% HealO%
50-59 1 1 100.0% 9.03k 67.1% 49.4%
60-69 7 3 28.6% 9.43k 63.1% 53.4%
70-79 39 4 48.7% 19.09k 104.0% 93.5%
80-89 29 6 41.4% 14.82k 93.5% 80.6%
90+ 15 1 6.7% 18.57k 185.1% 169.6%
Code: Select all
RR Dmg% KillDmg% ProtO% ProtRecv% Deaths Deaths%
50-59 11.0% 9.2% 0.0% 397.5% 3.0 171.4%
60-69 27.2% 26.6% 15.8% 250.5% 1.0 107.7%
70-79 40.6% 34.7% 22.8% 258.0% 1.5 154.4%
80-89 38.3% 36.6% 87.3% 219.5% 1.0 96.0%
90+ 49.9% 52.3% 97.7% 191.5% 0.5 70.5%
Small brackets should be read carefully.
Code: Select all
Players SC WP Heal/min Heal% HealO%
12-17 2 2 10.39k 79.8% 70.3%
18-23 6 5 12.66k 252.5% 305.5%
24 68 12 17.69k 105.1% 92.8%
25-35 15 8 15.23k 93.8% 83.9%
Code: Select all
Players Dmg% KillDmg% ProtO% ProtRecv% Deaths%
12-17 63.9% 65.8% 57.2% 56.1% 0.0%
18-23 41.8% 47.0% 51.1% 193.4% 96.0%
24 39.1% 34.8% 45.8% 244.7% 130.1%
25-35 41.3% 37.5% 47.6% 224.0% 86.7%
Code: Select all
Order healers SC WP Heal/min Heal% HealO%
<=3 48 10 17.36k 99.2% 88.5%
4-5 37 12 15.83k 107.9% 94.2%
6+ 6 4 18.19k 179.1% 177.4%
Code: Select all
Order healers Dmg% KillDmg% ProtO% ProtRecv% Deaths%
<=3 39.6% 34.4% 42.7% 266.4% 118.4%
4-5 40.3% 39.5% 51.0% 220.2% 132.6%
6+ 42.5% 40.3% 49.0% 144.4% 82.5%
Founder member & Ex-2OiC Tercio de Estalia (2019-23)
Que buen vasallo si tuviera buen señor
Proud Soldier "LOS AUTONOMOS" (Since 2025)
El Campeador estaba alegre, igual que todos los suyos, cuando su estandarte ondeó en lo alto del alcázar
Que buen vasallo si tuviera buen señor
Proud Soldier "LOS AUTONOMOS" (Since 2025)
El Campeador estaba alegre, igual que todos los suyos, cuando su estandarte ondeó en lo alto del alcázar
Re: Shield Warrior Priest underperformance even with BiS gear
So if I read this correctly, on average compared to other healers, less healing, less protection to others, far more protection received, more deaths ; I believe the rr90 warrior-priest is the only one with good numbers
- kleinbuchstabe
- Posts: 220
Re: Shield Warrior Priest underperformance even with BiS gear
Believe it or not, but thats exactly what I said right at the beginning, when this shieldbuild class change was introduced: It wont be possible to balance it. Either it will be overpowered or it will underperform. And as far as I can see, thats exactly what has happened, to the one side or to the other, during all the patches and adjustments this class has been through.Mvl130 wrote: Mon Jul 20, 2026 2:33 pm So if I read this correctly, on average compared to other healers, less healing, less protection to others, far more protection received, more deaths ; I believe the rr90 warrior-priest is the only one with good numbers
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], kpihuss and 44 guests



