Zone Lock Change Proposal

We want to hear your thoughts and ideas.
Forum rules
Before posting on this forum, be sure to read the Terms of Use

In this section you can give feedback and share your opinions on what should be changed for the Return of Reckoning Project. Before posting please make sure you read the Rules and Posting Guidelines to increase the efficiency of this forum.
tommyb23
Posts: 31

Re: Zone Lock Change Proposal

Post#11 » Thu Nov 12, 2015 12:04 am

magicthighs wrote:
tommyb23 wrote:Stealth take by order at STK when destro WB at elves... pvp dodging is real.
Because destro moving in a huge blob of 3+ warbands for hours on end earlier today was all about the pvp, right?
I don't think anyone wins with xrealming zergs no matter what system you have in place...

It sounds like there used to be a system like this in place, but people didn't like it. Would someone mind sharing the reasons? I'm sorry I wasn't playing back then, but it sounded like there were some issues.
Terranc - Chosen
Lorde - Marauder
Mmmmmmmmmmmmmm - Magus

Ads
User avatar
magicthighs
Former Staff
Posts: 717

Re: Zone Lock Change Proposal

Post#12 » Thu Nov 12, 2015 12:21 am

tommyb23 wrote:
magicthighs wrote:
tommyb23 wrote:Stealth take by order at STK when destro WB at elves... pvp dodging is real.
Because destro moving in a huge blob of 3+ warbands for hours on end earlier today was all about the pvp, right?
I don't think anyone wins with xrealming zergs no matter what system you have in place...
I'm sorry you guys got upset that order locked a zone when your stupid zerg was busy somewhere else. If you didn't move in a stupid zerg (sorry, I mean, if you weren't "doing pvp") you might have prevented it.
Image

tommyb23
Posts: 31

Re: Zone Lock Change Proposal

Post#13 » Thu Nov 12, 2015 12:26 am

I'm sorry you guys got upset that order locked a zone when your stupid zerg was busy somewhere else. If you didn't move in a stupid zerg (sorry, I mean, if you weren't "doing pvp") you might have prevented it.[/quote]

First of all, this was post the destro zerg when order started to give us AAO (no need to get all personal either).

Second, you further prove my point. Order preferred to PVE dance with a keep lord rather than pvp... Private WoW Servers are that way ------>
Terranc - Chosen
Lorde - Marauder
Mmmmmmmmmmmmmm - Magus

User avatar
magicthighs
Former Staff
Posts: 717

Re: Zone Lock Change Proposal

Post#14 » Thu Nov 12, 2015 2:51 am

tommyb23 wrote:
I'm sorry you guys got upset that order locked a zone when your stupid zerg was busy somewhere else. If you didn't move in a stupid zerg (sorry, I mean, if you weren't "doing pvp") you might have prevented it.
First of all, this was post the destro zerg when order started to give us AAO (no need to get all personal either).

Second, you further prove my point. Order preferred to PVE dance with a keep lord rather than pvp... Private WoW Servers are that way ------>
You still don't seem to get it. You can't blame order for just going to a different zone when you've been moving around in a huge blob for hours, and you certainly can't accuse them of avoiding pvp when you've been doing exactly that, avoiding actual pvp by moving around in that huge blob.

Anyway, I wasn't even in tier 2 during any of this. After I saw what destro was doing I decided is was more productive to roll an IB and play some scenarios. You know, to do real pvp. Try it, you might actually like it.
Image

User avatar
Coryphaus
Posts: 2230

Re: Zone Lock Change Proposal

Post#15 » Thu Nov 12, 2015 3:53 am

you make it sound like only one faction is doing this

furthermore i dont know about you but now with AAO you get some massive rr defending and attacking while out numbered

maybe people should just man up and rush to their keep for defense when facing a zerg then when you about to loose the keep just try and make a run to the wc for the next zone, you get a nice compensation in rr for trying any way
Image

tommyb23
Posts: 31

Re: Zone Lock Change Proposal

Post#16 » Thu Nov 12, 2015 11:13 am

Coryphaus wrote:you make it sound like only one faction is doing this

furthermore i dont know about you but now with AAO you get some massive rr defending and attacking while out numbered

maybe people should just man up and rush to their keep for defense when facing a zerg then when you about to loose the keep just try and make a run to the wc for the next zone, you get a nice compensation in rr for trying any way
Sorry, I only play one side and was trying to provide examples of what is actually happening. I would assume both sides are doing it, which is yet even more evidence to my point.

I agree with you on the AAO, but reality is different. We can talk all day about manning up or w/e, but I'm merely trying to show real examples of the current state not working as intended.
Terranc - Chosen
Lorde - Marauder
Mmmmmmmmmmmmmm - Magus

Sulorie
Posts: 7458

Re: Zone Lock Change Proposal

Post#17 » Thu Nov 12, 2015 11:35 am

tommyb23 wrote: I agree with you on the AAO, but reality is different. We can talk all day about manning up or w/e, but I'm merely trying to show real examples of the current state not working as intended.
I don't see ppl manning up in rvr, because all I see are public warbands without any organization. People take keeps and think they archived something, while the actual work did few groups.
Dying is no option.

User avatar
Kragg
Posts: 1781

Re: Zone Lock Change Proposal

Post#18 » Thu Nov 12, 2015 11:57 am

magicthighs wrote:
tommyb23 wrote:Stealth take by order at STK when destro WB at elves... pvp dodging is real.
Because destro moving in a huge blob of 3+ warbands for hours on end earlier today was all about the pvp, right?
71% of the server was destruction at some point, if the site was correct.
Image
Sergeant-Major Drengk Burloksson, RR 85 Sniper
Hulfdan Irongrip, RR 81 Ironbreaker
Rordin Brightrune, RR 70 Runepriest
Proud Founder of the 3rd Bitterstone Thunderers

Ads

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests