- As many players in T4 as possible doing RvR
- No leeching empty zones/keeps to avoid xp
- No T1-T3 twinks
- XP off book only for those who love PVE and quests
Petition RR cap == level cap
Forum rules
Before posting in this forum, please read the Terms of Use.
This section is for providing feedback and sharing your opinions on what could be improved or changed for the Return of Reckoning project.
To ensure your feedback is as helpful as possible, please review the Rules and Posting Guidelines before posting.
Before posting in this forum, please read the Terms of Use.
This section is for providing feedback and sharing your opinions on what could be improved or changed for the Return of Reckoning project.
To ensure your feedback is as helpful as possible, please review the Rules and Posting Guidelines before posting.
Petition RR cap == level cap
Yep original style
A reasonable RvR system that could make the majority happy http://imgur.com/HL6cgl7
Ads
Re: Petition RR cap == level cap
The original style was actually to allow twinks enter LOTD through teleportation, being able to leech off RP from zone locks and kills from their warband members. I remember I was a Blazer at lvl 6 in T3 zone and reached RR 12 after 20 min of playing. Those were the days, haha.
Something says me that you ain't the experinced guy from the Release...
Something says me that you ain't the experinced guy from the Release...
Sephanol - Chosen || Saora - Magus
- amputationsaw
- Posts: 629
Re: Petition RR cap == level cap
how will you manage this? like how will you control that the player who gets the book only do PvEBozzax wrote: XP off book only for those who love PVE and quests

Re: Petition RR cap == level cap
Maybe check if the player is PvP flagged
Or with the equipped book you only get XP from all PvP activities (playerkills, zonelocks, etc.) but not from NPC kills, area discovery, etc.
Or with the equipped book you only get XP from all PvP activities (playerkills, zonelocks, etc.) but not from NPC kills, area discovery, etc.
Re: Petition RR cap == level cap
A perfect suggestion to keep players from doing rvr.
Big fights max renown, then you have to farm pve to level up faster.
Wondering why people look for solutions for non existing problems.
Big fights max renown, then you have to farm pve to level up faster.
Wondering why people look for solutions for non existing problems.
Dying is no option.
- Nastylicious
- Posts: 275
Re: Petition RR cap == level cap
Bozzax wrote: As it was before EA/Myth step by step destroyed the game
Hmm this made me wonder who destroying it now

Re: Petition RR cap == level cap
So then why go back to that? Aren't we all trying to NOT duplicate their mistakes? lolBozzax wrote:As it was before EA/Myth step by step destroyed the game
Re: Petition RR cap == level cap
No xp book = no renow book also. That could work....amputationsaw wrote:how will you manage this? like how will you control that the player who gets the book only do PvEBozzax wrote: XP off book only for those who love PVE and quests
But i dont agree with the main thread suggestion. If the last sets is sovereign at rr 73-80 with no renow book and no exp book all should just go fine, you will never need to stop into t3 fear the gap cos old t4 progression was better and all itiem level set were properly scaled. Also at rank 32 you can take both t3 and t4 lock, so the chance to arrive in t4 with less then rr50 are impossible. Also rr0 -rr70 bracket for t1-t3 had good results bring ppl into sc (exept ppl warlod being too strong).
or either give tier a renow cap.
Make ppl able to have renow =x2 rank was a long waited fixes in war. There was a little gap even with old rr 80 enviroment. As long ppl have not control over it with books etc that's alredy fine. Also Bolster can be based on renow instead of rank help ppl to join fight from t3 into t4.
As long exp/renow on server are given proportionally when kill player and as sc winning bonus i see no problem.
Also this is a mmorpg there must remain some kind of progression to your toon, either give all equal chance with no time spent on it or either give to some of them huge advantage/disadvantage x time spent in some kind of situation likes book does it's wrong.
You need to train before being at top...... just being roll stomp is not fun, either way make all have an easy life make loose interest in the game.
All that said assuming we play in a sov eviroment, if server take another direction that will need to be better discuss with pros et contros

Ads
Re: Petition RR cap == level cap
Tier 1 (cap 11/11)
Decimator, Carnage
Tier 2 12 -21 (cap 21/21)
Obliterator, Havoc, Kepper’s
Tier 3 22-31 (cap 31/31)
Devastator, Mayhem, Redeye
Tier 4 32+
Ruin, Annihilator, Conq, Invader, Warlord, Sovereign, Bloodlord, sent, Dark, Tyrant
So in T1-T3 you can't think as caps are 11/11, 21/21 and 31/31 if you decide to xp off and do RvR or quest I have no problem with it
Decimator, Carnage
Tier 2 12 -21 (cap 21/21)
Obliterator, Havoc, Kepper’s
Tier 3 22-31 (cap 31/31)
Devastator, Mayhem, Redeye
Tier 4 32+
Ruin, Annihilator, Conq, Invader, Warlord, Sovereign, Bloodlord, sent, Dark, Tyrant
So in T1-T3 you can't think as caps are 11/11, 21/21 and 31/31 if you decide to xp off and do RvR or quest I have no problem with it
A reasonable RvR system that could make the majority happy http://imgur.com/HL6cgl7
- Nastylicious
- Posts: 275
Re: Petition RR cap == level cap
i heard one time that the devs said they will bring back warhammer exactly how we left it or was that all a LIE ? i know there must be balanced stuff that mythic didn't fix for sure but tesq now you got that perma buff stuff on kotbs and chosen arent you happy about that ? what more do you need to have before you are happy jeeez
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests