Recent Topics

Ads

healers (difference)

Chat about everything else - ask questions, share stories, or just hang out.
lilsabin
Posts: 619

healers (difference)

Post#1 » Thu Sep 24, 2015 8:00 pm

what is the difference between a shaman and a zealot ?

Ads
Landaren
Posts: 226

Re: healers (difference)

Post#2 » Thu Sep 24, 2015 8:01 pm

Insta heal and various buffs

User avatar
Shivashanti
Posts: 58

Re: healers (difference)

Post#3 » Thu Sep 24, 2015 8:05 pm

a shaman heals more over time (hots) has a bigger absorb shield and can steal ap atm so he can cast the grp heal often
the zealot is the burst healer which heals much with his insta heal, big hots and big castheal (so the better single target healer) and he can switch fast between heal and dmg with his career skill

hope this helps :)

User avatar
Jaycub
Posts: 3130

Re: healers (difference)

Post#4 » Thu Sep 24, 2015 8:42 pm

Zealot/RP are better slightly better healers thanks to instant cast heal, and are much easier to play effectively because their non heal contribution is mostly passive from various buffs. Their class mechanic actually makes it pretty risky to DPS at any point because of the lengthy cooldown to be able to go back to healing, was never a fan of it.

AM/Shaman are built around doing both healing and damage, although you will be speccing into only one. The thing about these classes is their non healing contribution to the team is much more active than the other healing classes. To be effective you must properly place the snare pools, AP and debuff the correct targets, and use your class mechanic to get off 1 good heal or damaging spell depending on your spec. Much harder to play, but in my opinion much more fun and rewarding when played at the highest skill level.
<Lords of the Locker Room> <Old School>

User avatar
Libra
Posts: 551

Re: healers (difference)

Post#5 » Thu Sep 24, 2015 9:35 pm

Jaycub wrote:Zealot/RP are better slightly better healers thanks to instant cast heal, and are much easier to play effectively because their non heal contribution is mostly passive from various buffs. Their class mechanic actually makes it pretty risky to DPS at any point because of the lengthy cooldown to be able to go back to healing, was never a fan of it.

AM/Shaman are built around doing both healing and damage, although you will be speccing into only one. The thing about these classes is their non healing contribution to the team is much more active than the other healing classes. To be effective you must properly place the snare pools, AP and debuff the correct targets, and use your class mechanic to get off 1 good heal or damaging spell depending on your spec. Much harder to play, but in my opinion much more fun and rewarding when played at the highest skill level.
Sir. I think I agree.
Sephanol - Chosen || Saora - Magus

User avatar
Luuca
Posts: 1204

Re: healers (difference)

Post#6 » Thu Sep 24, 2015 9:37 pm

Jaycub wrote:Zealot/RP are better slightly better healers thanks to instant cast heal, and are much easier to play effectively because their non heal contribution is mostly passive from various buffs. Their class mechanic actually makes it pretty risky to DPS at any point because of the lengthy cooldown to be able to go back to healing, was never a fan of it.

AM/Shaman are built around doing both healing and damage, although you will be speccing into only one. The thing about these classes is their non healing contribution to the team is much more active than the other healing classes. To be effective you must properly place the snare pools, AP and debuff the correct targets, and use your class mechanic to get off 1 good heal or damaging spell depending on your spec. Much harder to play, but in my opinion much more fun and rewarding when played at the highest skill level.
Shlomo, where did you copy/paste this from? I'd like to read the rest.

Penril
Posts: 4441

Re: healers (difference)

Post#7 » Thu Sep 24, 2015 9:38 pm

Luuca wrote:
Jaycub wrote:Zealot/RP are better slightly better healers thanks to instant cast heal, and are much easier to play effectively because their non heal contribution is mostly passive from various buffs. Their class mechanic actually makes it pretty risky to DPS at any point because of the lengthy cooldown to be able to go back to healing, was never a fan of it.

AM/Shaman are built around doing both healing and damage, although you will be speccing into only one. The thing about these classes is their non healing contribution to the team is much more active than the other healing classes. To be effective you must properly place the snare pools, AP and debuff the correct targets, and use your class mechanic to get off 1 good heal or damaging spell depending on your spec. Much harder to play, but in my opinion much more fun and rewarding when played at the highest skill level.
Shlomo, where did you copy/paste this from? I'd like to read the rest.
made me giggle :lol:

User avatar
Zealote
Posts: 456

Re: healers (difference)

Post#8 » Thu Sep 24, 2015 9:42 pm

Jaycub wrote:<> Their class mechanic actually makes it pretty risky to DPS at any point because of the lengthy cooldown to be able to go back to healing, was never a fan of it. <>
The 20s cd on Harbinger of Doom only triggers when you switch it off, i.e. go *back* to healing, or d'you mean sth else?
Aetir

Ads
User avatar
Jaycub
Posts: 3130

Re: healers (difference)

Post#9 » Thu Sep 24, 2015 9:47 pm

Zealote wrote:
Jaycub wrote:<> Their class mechanic actually makes it pretty risky to DPS at any point because of the lengthy cooldown to be able to go back to healing, was never a fan of it. <>
The 20s cd on Harbinger of Doom only triggers when you switch it off, i.e. go *back* to healing, or d'you mean sth else?
So if you are in healing mode and switch to DPS you can immediately go back to healing? And then the cooldown is in place?
<Lords of the Locker Room> <Old School>

Penril
Posts: 4441

Re: healers (difference)

Post#10 » Thu Sep 24, 2015 9:49 pm

Jaycub wrote:
Zealote wrote:
Jaycub wrote:<> Their class mechanic actually makes it pretty risky to DPS at any point because of the lengthy cooldown to be able to go back to healing, was never a fan of it. <>
The 20s cd on Harbinger of Doom only triggers when you switch it off, i.e. go *back* to healing, or d'you mean sth else?
So if you are in healing mode and switch to DPS you can immediately go back to healing? And then the cooldown is in place?
Yes.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Otanks, sacredfenix55 and 10 guests