When SC weapons released on live I was against it. Scenarios have all the structure they need to be a desirable form of play without pulling players from RvR by having some of the best weapons available. LotD weapons had the same problem, BiS gear should come from RvR if that's what you want people to play, IMHO.eatscrickets wrote:Of course they are different game systems - but its rewards split the game into play this field for your armor, and play this field for your weapons. I have just found it polarizes player activity based on what they are grinding for atm. I always think its funny to hear people yell about the campers in the WC - well, they are doing scs for weapons. Should the requirements for gear be mixed, then every player needs to be involved in the entire game.
Again, its just a thought. Im sure there are many reasons its a bad idea.
For RoR, I would rather see PvE sets tied to scenarios than weapons. A weaker alternative to BiS equipment, not a grinding requirement. Currently with how the T2 works, people don't need them, and RvR is happening instead. Might be an issue in the future.